College students have the right to caucus in Iowa!

The blogosphere has been ablaze this week after Register columnist David Yepsen’s piece about trying to preserve the sanctity of the Iowa Caucuses by essentially banning out-of-state students attending school in Iowa from coming back to Iowa to caucus.

First of all, I think desmoinesdem is right with her post here calling for Yepsen to apologize to Obama.  As Obama’s been the most vocal of the Democrats calling for students to come back and caucus, he’s been the brunt of Yepsen’s attacks.  Instead, the Obama campaign has been busy fighting with the good progressive ally Paul Krugman instead of David Yepsen who often will smack down truly progressive ideas without indulging them fully or honestly.  So, while the Obama campaign may desperately want the Register’s endorsement, challenging his assertions and his problematic claims against students may do even more to boost your campaign than the endorsement.  But that’s another story entirely.

But secondly, I felt it was my place to respond as a college student (admittedly from Iowa) with many, many friends from outside of Iowa who plan on staying in the state to caucus.  These students spend at least nine months of the year here in the state and have the choice to register to vote here as Iowans.  When you spend 3/4 of your year in a state where you pay income tax on any jobs you might have and pay the local sales tax it seems quite clear to me that you ought to have a say in the elections the state holds, no matter who the candidates are.  The Iowa Democratic Party agrees.  From a statement released this afternoon by IDP Chair Scott Brennan:

“In running the First in the Nation Caucuses, the Iowa Democratic Party follows the Iowa Code in determining the eligibility of potential caucus goers. According to the Iowa Code, all college students who are at least 18 years old are eligible to vote and, therefore, eligible to caucus.

Any student who attends an Iowa college or university may participate in the Iowa caucuses provided they are 18 by November 4, 2008, and are a registered Democrat in the precinct in which they wish to caucus.

The Iowa Democratic Party encourages all eligible caucus goers to attend their precinct caucuses on January 3rd to strengthen the Democratic Party and declare their presidential preference.”

It is really just that simple.  And like others before me have said, David Yepsen is just being elitist in this column and implying tactics that are shady when in fact they’re completely legitimate and legal.

What is even worse is that some presidential campaigns are still agreeing with the rhetoric calling for all out-of-staters to stay away from the caucuses.  While Clinton’s campaign has been back-tracking, they still can’t offer a full answer on whether students from outside Iowa should caucus.  Chris Dodd’s campaign is the one that started the pledge, and both Biden and Richardson have tacitly or overtly signed on and offered rhetoric in support of the policy.  This is absurd to me, and I hope that the campaigns are questioned about this in tomorrow’s Register Democratic debate.  But I doubt it will come up.

And, just to rub it in David Yepsen’s face, here is the Drake student newspaper’s article on how students can sign-up to stay overnight in the Olmsted Center–Drake’s student union–and caucus on January 3rd.

College students in Iowa, stand up and have your voices heard!

About the Author(s)

Chris Woods

  • Go to Newsweek.com

    And read their Stumper blog.  Andrew Romano’s post is exactly what young reporters should be saying.  Stop giving Yepsen a break; the so-called “Dean of the Iowa Political Press Corps” doesn’t deserve that title any more.

  • Pledge?

    Chris Dodd’s campaign is the one that started the pledge, and both Biden and Richardson have tacitly or overtly signed on and offered rhetoric in support of the policy.

    Chris, the only pledge the Dodd campaign started relating to out of state voters was for all the campaigns to pledge that their out of state staff and volunteers would not participate in the caucus. So if you say the Dodd campaign “is the one that started the pledge” I’m not sure what you’re referring to.

    For the record, here’s the Dodd campaign’s statement on student voting, from our Communications Director Hari Sevugan:

     “We welcome the participation of Iowa students in the process.”

    Since there’s been some question elsewhere, I’ll preemptively note that Iowa students are students who are eligible to vote in Iowa.

    I hope this helps clear things up.

    • Thanks for the clarification

      Matt, my apologies for misconstruing the situation with the pledge from the Dodd campaign.  My reference was to the one you were talking about, but I think its intent and purpose have been twisted in the past few weeks.

      I was culling through old releases and I came across this information which might be valuable in understanding the intent of the pledge (which I believe caused this whole fracas in the first place):

      “The intention of this pledge is to ensure that the Iowa Caucuses belong to Iowans and aren’t interfered with by paid staff who are only in the state to work for a campaign.”

      That’s from a Nov. 12 press release I got from Taylor West here in Iowa.  It seems like the traditional media and/or some of the campaigns are missing this point.

      Now I just wish they’d get honest.  Thanks again for the clarification, Matt.

      • Richardson and the Pledge

        Chris, just as a point of clarification, Richardson’s campaign is most emphatically not on board with the out of state pledge for staffers/volunteers (which, as Matt points out above, is nothing to do with the whole student fracas). Here’s the text of a press release dated 11/08/2007 from Richardson’s Caucus Director Shari Fitzgerald:


        FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

        November 8, 2007

        Contact:       Lauren Rose

        (515) 243-9502

        Richardson Iowa Caucus Director Blasts Dodd Proposal to Disenfranchise Iowans from Caucus

        DES MOINES, IA— Shari Fitzgerald, Presidential Candidate Bill Richardson’s Iowa Caucus Director, today issued the following statement:

        “I have participated in every Presidential caucus since 1972 and refuse to be bound not to caucus for the candidate of my choice by any candidate or their campaign-ever.  I am an Iowan and it is not just my right, but my duty as a citizen to participate in my caucus.  It is unfair to try to disenfranchise any Iowan from this critical process.”

        ###

        Paid for by Richardson for President, Inc.

        I’ve also been told by an extremely knowledgeable source that Dodd’s state director Julie Andreeff Jensen contacted her opposite numbers in the other campaigns about the pledge idea prior to publicly announcing it, so it’s not as if the pledge came as bolt from the blue. Consequently, I find the Richardson campaign’s response as quoted above to be something less than credible.

        ~iPol: the Personal Pronoun, as applied to politics.

      • No worries

        No worries Chris, glad to clear things up.  

Comments