[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog for Democrats and progressives in the state of Iowa. Join up, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, and help build up current majorities and keep our leadership honest.
Authors
- desmoinesdem
- Mark Langgin
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (pt. 1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (pt. 2)
- National politics in 2009 (pt. 1)
- National politics in 2009 (pt. 2)
- Add this blog to your list of Technorati favorites
Twitter Updates
    - follow desmoinesdem on Twitter
    Search




    Advanced Search


    Paid Advertising


    Mobile Blog Reader - powered by Notice Orange
    Bleeding Heartland
    It's what plants crave.

    Survey USA finds record low approval for Grassley

    by: desmoinesdem

    Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 10:05:54 AM CDT


    Via the Senate Guru blog I saw that Survey USA released results from its late September poll of 600 adults in Iowa (margin of error 4.1 percent). The survey measured Senator Chuck Grassley's approval rating at 50 percent. That's the lowest figure ever for Grassley by this pollster, and you can see from this graph that Grassley's trendlines are ugly. A full 40 percent of respondents disapprove of Grassley's performance. His high-profile role in the health care reform debate seems to have hurt his image. Senate Guru notes, "Grassley is also below 50% approval among independents (48%) and self-described moderates (47%)."

    The Des Moines Register published a new article Monday on rumors that a well-known and well-funded Democrat will give Grassley "the race of his life." Speculation seems to be centering on former First Lady Christie Vilsack, who is now executive director of the Iowa Initiative, and prominent attorney Roxanne Conlin, a onetime U.S. Attorney who was the Democratic nominee for governor in 1982.

    Other notable findings from Survey USA in September: Senator Tom Harkin is at 44 percent approval and 46 percent disapproval. President Barack Obama's approve/disapprove numbers in Iowa are now 46/48, but there is a huge gender gap. Among male respondents, 39 percent approve of Obama and 56 disapprove. Among female respondents, 53 percent approve and only 40 percent disapprove.

    I was surprised to see that Survey USA didn't find nearly as much of a gender gap concerning Governor Chet Culver. Culver's at 41 percent approve/48 percent disapprove overall. Among men and women, 41 percent approve of Culver's performance. The difference is that 55 percent of men said they disapprove of Culver, versus only 44 percent of women (a full 15 percent of female respondents answered "not sure"). If I were running Culver's re-election campaign, I would put a high priority on building support among women voters. If a well-known woman makes a serious run at Grassley, that should help boost turnout among women Democrats and leaners.

    Incidentally, Swing State Project changed its rating on the Iowa governor's race from "race to watch" (but safe for the incumbent) to "likely D." They may revise that rating again if former Governor Terry Branstad enters the campaign.

    Survey USA's Iowa sample in September consisted of 35 percent Democrats, 29 percent Republicans, and 31 percent independents. The sample for their August Iowa poll was quite different: 28 percent Democrats, 34 percent Republicans, and 35 percent independents. That alone could explain why Grassley's approval rating fell from August to September, while Culver's rose a bit from his all-time Survey USA low in August.

    It's obviously way too early to predict what proportion of Democrats and Republicans will turn out to vote in Iowa next November. The GOP primary for governor could energize that party's base or cause lasting divisions. The Democratic base may or may not be excited, depending on what Culver and state legislators accomplish next session and whether Grassley's race becomes competitive.  Unemployment seems likely to keep rising.  

    Share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

    desmoinesdem :: Survey USA finds record low approval for Grassley
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Grassleys, Vilsacks, and Culvers (4.00 / 1)
    Hoo boy, lots to comment on here!

    First, the Grassley numbers are very interesting. It's remarkable how stable his numbers had been until now--hovering around 60-30 for four years (probably around that for a decade plus, but the graph doesn't go back that far). He's really in a tailspin!

    Second, I just don't see Roxanne Conlin and Christie Vilsack in the same league. Vilsack is a game-changer. Conlin is, well, an Art Small.

    Third, I don't really understand the Swing State Project rating. Is "likely Dem" more competitive than "Race to Watch"? In either case, this is the take away from their analysis:

    But in this toxic political environment, few incumbents are truly safe, and regardless of which pollster you believe, it would be hard to describe Culver's approval ratings as "good."

    And on your "Women for Culver" strategy: How would you do something like that? Use Patty Judge? I mean, he could try to roll out Mari, but she's not quite the charmer Christie Vilsack was.  


    SSP ratings (4.00 / 1)
    Safe D means absolutely safe, nothing to see here
    Race to Watch means could potentially become competitive
    Likely D means competitive, but D strongly favored
    Lean D
    Tossup
    Lean R
    Likely R

    If Branstad gets in, I would assume they'll change the rating to lean D, although they could shift it to tossup.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


    [ Parent ]
    women for Culver strategy (4.00 / 1)
    I don't know the best way to go about this, but Culver's already hired someone who knows where to find Iowa women's votes: Teresa Vilmain.

    Roxanne Conlin is definitely not Art Small. For one thing, she could pour lots of money into the race. There's no way Grassley would get 70 percent against Conlin.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


    [ Parent ]
    I have to wonder (4.00 / 1)
    if IA-Sen isn't a risky strategy for Vilsack.

    Teen pregnancy/RIF aren't banner issues for a statewide race. Nice as she may be, she's still a "wife of." Less of an issue in Des Moines perhaps, where power couples and foundation work may be viewed differently (more about this soon ...) but statewide? Why risk the almost sure bet of political entry via IA-03?

    For some reason, I think it's more likely Conlin. She's independently wealthy and can raise money w/o draining the DSCC. I don't think Dems want to empty the purse on IA-Sen. Grassley may be down, but he's still +6 over Harkin in SUSA.



    [ Parent ]
    I don't know if IA-03 (4.00 / 1)
    is a sure bet for Vilsack. That will be a crowded Democratic primary whenever it happens. And if Boswell doesn't retire in 2012 and loses to Latham, then she's looking at a race against a GOP incumbent in 2014.

    Conlin loves the courtroom and would be giving up a lot of income to take this race on--immeasurably more than Vilsack. Then again, maybe she loves campaigning too. She certainly wouldn't need the DSCC's help.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


    [ Parent ]
    one thing that crossed my mind (4.00 / 1)
    is that someone will claim to be pretty much in to save Kiernan's credibiity and then back out. A possibility.

    If Boswell's performance is lackluster this year, I expect him to get a gentle nudge out for 2012. I just relived the '06-'08 campaigns via google and youtube. I only found one promotional item for Schmett, a mock debate w/ a Boswell puppet. That Schmett was able to pull down 44% is sad.

    Boswell's base is the whiter, working-class and rural voters in the counties common to pre- and post-2002 redistricting. Where he outperformed Obama, it was generally at the polls, not by absentee. On the fip side, he trailed Obama in precincts w/ $$, esp in Polk, and even in obviously liberal boomer urban precincts. It's something of a snob factor. I think voters in the Des Moines area are looking for a little more support for the idea that Des Moines is going places and a little less Green Acres.

    There are two groups Dems will have trouble w/ next year. First, upper 20% by household income two-earner professionals w/ and w/o kids, prosperity voters. Some may have voted Bush in '04 but shifted Dem. The plan, though, wasn't too sit in too much house, or heavy reliance on the female partner for income, or to evaluate whether starting a family is even in the cards these days.

    Second group is working-class voters, esp men & manufacturing. I see Vilsack as especially weak here. We just had an "identity politics" election, and things are worse now. I don't see working-class areas getting terribly excited about "wife of" and her foundation. Teen pregnancy and reading are soft issues for the times. Also, she can't remain "nice" against Grassley, so it's a short transition to b___. She does have star power, but it's more bang for the buck in a district dominated by Des Moines.

    Conlin can safely skewer Grassley as an extension of her trial lawyer persona. "Nice" is kind of a curse for women.


    [ Parent ]
    plus, Conlin's already been attacked (0.00 / 0)
    as a candidate, so I guess she would be ready for whatever comes her way. But the right-wing message machine is much more developed today compared to the people who brought you those "Taxanne" bumper stickers in 1982.


    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

    [ Parent ]
    Very Interesting Numbers (4.00 / 1)
    I think a lot of this can be chalked up to a general anti-incumbent attitude that is all the rage these days it seems.  People are mad at Democrats for not getting things done, but they still don't trust the Repubs.  

    There is no doubt healthcare has hurt Grassley.  It exposed him as the right-winger he is and permanently stained his fake bi-partisan patina.  Grassley is going to be VERY tough to beat, but if a good healthcare bill passes without Grassley's help, he could be in serious trouble.  

    I agree with 007, Vilsack is a much better bet than Conlin.  First, people my age don't know who Conlin is (I was born the year she last ran) and second, she is a trial lawyer (good for fundraising/ bad for image making).  Also, I'm pretty sure anyone married to the Ag Secretary could raise some serious money. Plus, how are we going to run against Branstad as a retread and have a lady from 1982 run in the Senate race?

    I think Culver is OK against anyone but Branstad.  I think it will be very close if Branstad gets in.  I agree that women are key in both races and a woman on the ticket would certainly lift all boats.  I'd argue that ONLY a woman could beat Grassley.  I really hope Vilsack gets in.  At least we'd have something to be excited about!  It about damn time Iowa elects a woman anyway.


    Branstad could get beaten up badly (0.00 / 0)
    in the GOP primary. He would probably win, but would the base be willing to work hard for him in November? Not so sure--especially if he picks a pro-choice running mate.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

    [ Parent ]
    I've been pretty committed to sitting out in 2010, (4.00 / 2)
    as far as putting my boots on the ground to volunteer.  I'm still burned out from the caucus/general election cycle of 07-08, but if the Iowa Democratic party puts a viable female candidate up against Grassley, I might just have to change my mind.  The only other thing that would have gotten my dander up enough to get me out of campaign volunteer retirement would have been if Steve King got in the race against Culver.  Then you'd better believe I would have been out there!

    As it is, we lived away from Iowa during Vilsack's terms as governor, so I don't have a strong impression of Christie Vilsack either way.  I've heard she's very warm and charming, but what's her policy/issues stance cred like?


    you and a lot of other women (4.00 / 1)
    I keep hearing people tell me they used to think Grassley wasn't "that bad," but this year he has really made them angry.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

    [ Parent ]
    Conlin's My Guess (4.00 / 2)
    To echo a previous commenter, Roxanne Conlin is NOT Art Small.

    Roxanne Conlin consistently snags six to seven figure verdicts from Iowa juries, who are known to be relatively conservative.  How is she able to do this?  She is witty, charming, and down to earth.  She knows how to speak to Iowans.  She knows how to appeal to Iowans' value systems.  

    Additionally, Roxanne is a fundraising machine.  Her house in Southern Hills consistently hosts various money raising events for Democratic candidates and causes, and the turnout is usually significant.  Notably, she held a $50,000/per plate fund raising dinner at her house this past summer for Nancy Pelosi.  By no means small potatoes.

    Roxanne is also the "first" in many respects.  First female president of the American Trial Lawyers Association.  One of the first female U.S. Attorneys.  (Google her C.V.; the lists of "firsts" goes on and on).  

    Finally, Roxanne would be a much smarter and much more appealable candidate than she was in the gubernatorial race 25+ years ago.  She's lost the big hair, and the big glasses.  Her recent Microsoft class action verdict that landed millions of dollars for Iowa consumers and Iowa schools has made her relatively visible to the Iowa public.  

    In sum, I wouldn't underestimate Roxanne Conlin in a race against Grassley.


    Wrong Figure on Pelosi Fundraising Dinner (0.00 / 0)
    I meant to say the fundraising dinner was $5,000--not $50,000.  

    [ Parent ]
    Terry Who? (4.00 / 1)
    I don't get the assumption that Branstad is formidable.  How many politicians make comebacks after 12 years?  What's he been doing in the meantime and why don't I know about it already?  

    Recalling him to lead a ticket would just paint the Rs as the party of the past.  


    that could be a problem for them (0.00 / 0)
    They certainly can't claim to be offering any new ideas or skills.

    Then again, three polls have now shown Branstad leading Culver. I don't think those polls are particularly meaningful more than a year before the election, and when Branstad hasn't been in a political brawl for 15 years, but many people find them compelling.

    Several other former governors are seeking their old jobs next year.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


    [ Parent ]
    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    Iowa Liberal Blogs
    - Ames Progressive
    - Blog For Iowa
    - Common Iowan
    - Iowa Independent
    - IowaDemocrat
    - Iowa Guy
    - Iowa Liberal
    - Iowa Progress
    - John Deeth
    - Lefty Blogs Iowa
    - Political Fallout
    - Popular Progressive
    Iowa Conservative Blogs
    - Hawkeye Review
    - Hawkeye GOP
    - Iowa Defense Alliance
    - Questions, Comments & Insults
    - The Bean Walker
    - The Iowa Republican
    - The Real Sporer
    Iowa Hybrid Political Blogs
    - Essential Estrogen
    - God, Politics and Rock 'n' Roll
    Political Journalists' Blogs
    - 24-Hour Dorman (Todd Dorman)
    - Covering Iowa Politics (Cedar Rapids Gazette/Lee Enterprises staff)
    - Iowa Insider (Charlotte Eby)
    - Iowa Political Alert (Douglas Burns)
    - IowaPolitics.com (Lynn Campbell)
    - Iowa Politics Insider (Des Moines Register staff)
    - On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
    - Politically Speaking (Bret Hayworth)
    - Price of Politics, etc. (Dave Price)
    - Radio Iowa blog (O.Kay Henderson)
    Iowa Democrats
    - Chet Culver (Governor)
    - Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
    - Bruce Braley (IA-01)
    - Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
    - Leonard Boswell (IA-03)
    - Iowa Democratic Party
    - Iowa House Democrats
    - Iowa Senate Democrats
    - Iowa 4th District Democrats
    - Iowa 5th District Democrats
    - Francis Thicke for Secretary of Agriculture
    - Roxanne Conlin for U.S. Senate
    - Tom Fiegen for U.S. Senate
    - Bob Krause for U.S. Senate
    - Bill Maske for Congress (IA-04)
    - Matt Campbell for Congress (IA-05)
    - Mike Denklau for Congress (IA-05)
    County Democrats
    - County chairs list at IDP site
    - Iowa 4th District Democrats (includes contact info for county chairs)
    - Iowa 5th District Democrats (includes contact info for county officers)
    - Allamakee County Democrats
    - Appanoose County Democrats
    - Black Hawk County Democrats
    - Boone County Democrats
    - Bremer County Democrats
    - Buena Vista County Democrats
    - Carroll County Democrats
    - Cedar County Democrats
    - Clinton County Democrats
    - Dubuque County Democrats
    - Emmet County Democrats
    - Fayette County Democrats
    - Hardin County Democrats
    - Harrison County Democrats
    - Henry County Democrats
    - Jackson County Democrats
    - Jefferson County Democrats
    - Johnson County Democrats
    - Linn County Democrats
    - Marion County Democrats
    - Monona County Democrats
    - Muscatine County Democrats
    - Page County Democrats
    - Pocahontas County Democrats
    - Polk County Democrats
    - Scott County Democrats
    - Story County Democrats
    - Tama County Democrats
    - Wapello County Democrats
    - Warren County Democrats
    - Washington County Democrats
    - Woodbury County Democrats
    Statistics




     
    Powered by: SoapBlox