Victory Enterprises, a consultant for Republican Brad Zaun's Congressional campaign, conducted a poll showing Zaun leading incumbent Representative Leonard Boswell by 41 percent to 32 percent, with 27 percent undecided. The poll surveyed 400 "likely voters" in Iowa's third district on June 17, producing a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percent. The Des Moines Register's Kathie Obradovich noticed some unusual features of the sample:
One thing to note is the party distribution: More Democrats (43 percent) than Republicans (38 percent) but only 19 percent independents. As of the most recent Secretary of State report on voter registration, Democrats make up 38 percent of registered voters in the 3rd District; Republicans, 30 percent and no-party, 32 percent.
The campaign screened to include voters with a history of participating in off-year general elections. That's why there are fewer independents. The Zaun campaign says they're not as faithful about voting in off-year elections as registered party members. So these poll results are likely to look different from polls that allow for more participation from independents. It also puts a premium on Polk County voters, which the campaign says is based on history but is also where Zaun is by far the strongest.
No-party voters are less likely to turn out for off-year elections, but 19 percent sounds low. In 2006, about 26 percent of general election voters in Iowa were independents. I don't know what that figure was in IA-03. Boswell's campaign manager, Grant Woodard, cast doubt on the poll's reliability:
"Internal polls created by hired political consultants are almost always bogus. This "poll" is highly suspect - 30.3 percent heard of him but have no opinion and another 18.3% have never heard of him and have no opinion whatsoever. In other words if nearly 50 percent of the participants don't have an opinion on Sen. Zaun how could they come to this conclusion? It isn't worth the paper it is written on. Clearly this "poll" was cooked up in order for Sen. Zaun to jumpstart his notoriously tepid fundraising. We understand the games that they are trying to play."
Obradovich posted the Zaun campaign's defense of the poll here.
I would love to see an independent survey on this race, but public polls of Congressional districts are hard to come by. Zaun was campaigning actively around IA-03 all spring, as he faced a competitive Republican primary, so he may have gotten a bump. Boswell hasn't kicked his re-election bid into gear yet. When he starts spending his war chest, we'll get a better sense of how worried he is about Zaun. If Boswell goes negative on Zaun early, instead of talking primarily about his own record, that's a sign his own internal polling is not encouraging.
Oddly, I agree with Krusty on Zaun's weaknesses going into the general:
In Zaun, Boswell will face a tenacious campaigner, but also someone that couldn't raise much money and has a 20-year record to pick apart.
There is no doubt that Zaun will try to make this campaign about the bailouts, Obamacare, and all of that, but Boswell is going to make this race to make this about agriculture and rural issues.
Zaun's primary opponents said little about his record beyond criticizing his vote for an anti-bullying bill. Boswell's campaign will probably educate third district voters about other aspects of Zaun's record as state senator and mayor of Urbandale. |
![[Bleeding Heartland Logo]](http://www.bleedingheartland.com/upload/logo.jpg){kind=logo}
