[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2013
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 25
- House district 28
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

I really don't believe that she'll stick to that position

by: desmoinesdem

Wed Dec 12, 2012 at 18:08:32 PM CST


Outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, asked by Barbara Walters about running for president:

"I've said I really don't believe that that's something I will do again," says Clinton. "I am so grateful I had the experience of doing it before. I think there are lots of ways to serve, so I'll continue to serve." [...]

Clinton adds, "I just want to see what else is out there. I've been doing this incredibly important and satisfying work in Washington as I say for 20 years. I want to get out and spend some time looking at what else I can do to contribute."

That's the least convincing non-denial denial I've heard in a while. The next Democratic presidential nomination is Hillary Clinton's if she wants it. I don't see her turning her back on that chance.

UPDATE: I am in rare agreement with Newt Gingrich: if Hillary runs for president in 2016, "the Republican party today is incapable of competing at that level."

desmoinesdem :: I really don't believe that she'll stick to that position
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Not gonna do it.... (0.00 / 0)
Just a feeling her ship has sailed...her choice. Bill has carved himself out a nice niche with his institute...I think she wants to do the same. Also I think she really wants to be a grandma. I would argue that she is the most popular public figure in the country...I cannot think of anyone else more popular...

assuming she is still healthy (0.00 / 0)
in 2015 I see no reason for her not to run for president.  

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
I'm with Desmoinesdem (4.00 / 1)
on this one. Having fought so hard and bitterly in 2008, I can't see her turning away from a nomination that will be handed to her.

and why should she (0.00 / 0)
fade into the background when she is the most popular candidate among Democrats by far?

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Clinton (0.00 / 0)
It makes no sense for her not to run.  There's no "once in a lifetime" candidate running against her.  I have friends online who mention Obama dumping Biden with Hillary (still) once a week.

I would prefer other candidates, but that is due to her reluctance to change entitlement programs and the fact that she does still rally the Republicans.  I'll be accused of sexism if I don't support her though.

I don't like how she automatically discredits Ross Perot on NAFTA as well, but the candidates I would prefer would adopt the same trade model  as Clinton,    


I opposed her in 2007 for two reasons (4.00 / 1)
I didn't want a repeat of Clintonomics, and I thought she would lose to a Republican, leading to more Alitos and Scalias on the Supreme Court.

Obama's economic policy is at least as bad as Clintonomics 2.0, maybe worse. I don't see any progressive alternative to Hillary who could win the nomination in 2016, though. I would rather spend my time on other hopeless causes.

Also, I no longer worry as much that she would lose to a Republican.  She may energize parts of their base, but the Clintons are not as polarizing as they were 5-10 years ago. Anything can happen, but she would go into the general election favored to win against anyone I can imagine them nominating.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox