[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Mid-week open thread: Trillion-dollar coin edition (updated)

by: desmoinesdem

Wed Jan 09, 2013 at 15:28:00 PM CST


As the next showdown over raising the debt ceiling approaches, a new scenario has emerged as a possible way to avoid both default and budget concessions to Congressional Republicans. Some analysts believe the government could mint one platinum coin, assigning a denomination of a trillion dollars, and deposit that coin in the treasury to "pay down" a trillion dollars of our national debt. Not everyone agrees that minting the coin is a realistic option, though. I've posted some links and analysis after the jump.

For the record, I don't believe President Barack Obama would seriously consider minting a trillion-dollar coin. In fact, the only past presidents I could imagine pulling a stunt like that would be FDR, LBJ, and Richard Nixon. What do you think, Bleeding Heartland readers? Incidentally, today would have been Tricky Dick's 100th birthday.

This is an open thread, so all topics are welcome.

desmoinesdem :: Mid-week open thread: Trillion-dollar coin edition (updated)
The U.S. hit the current debt ceiling on December 31 and will have to take drastic measures to keep the government running without some action by Congress or the Obama administration to raise the debt ceiling before the end of February. Default would be a bad scenario on many levels.

Some have argued that the president could get around Congress by invoking the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states, "the validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law ... shall not be questioned." House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi favors this scenario. But law professor Laurence Tribe doesn't consider the 14th Amendment a viable option for avoiding a debt ceiling fight. Today White House spokesman Jay Carney ruled out the 14th Amendment solution but did not rule out minting a platinum coin.

For some reason, Congress did not limit the Treasury secretary's power to "mint and issue platinum bullion coins and proof platinum coins in accordance with such specifications, designs, varieties, quantities, denominations, and inscriptions as the Secretary, in the Secretary's discretion, may prescribe from time to time."

Maybe this language reflects a drafting error, or maybe members of Congress had some other purpose behind the wording. Presumably they did not imagine the the president could use this authority to circumvent a bill from Congress raising the debt ceiling. Then again, until recent years raising the debt ceiling was an uncontroversial bipartisan routine in Washington.

Tribe commented to the Washington Monthly's Ryan Cooper,

I don't think it makes sense to think about this as some sort of "loophole" issue. Using the statute this way doesn't entail exploiting a loophole; it entails just reading the plain language that Congress used. The statute clearly does authorize the issuance of trillion-dollar coins. First, the statute itself doesn't set any limit on coin value. Second, other clauses of 31 USC §5112 do set such limits, but §5112(k)-dealing with platinum coins-does not. So expressio unius strengthens the inference that there isn't any limit here. [...]

It's also quite clear that the minting of such a coin couldn't be challenged; I don't see who would have standing.

Donald Marron of the Tax Policy Center explains here that the "legal arguments against it [minting the coin] are weak at best." House Republicans seem to recognize that, because they are drawing up a bill to prevent the government from minting high-denomination platinum coins.

That leaves only political and economic arguments against using this gimmick. Josh Barro of Bloomberg News refutes some of those arguments here. Paul Krugman made a good analogy:

Here's how to think about that: we have a situation in which a terrorist may be about to walk into a crowded room and threaten to blow up a bomb he's holding. It turns out, however, that the Secret Service has figured out a way to disarm this maniac - a way that for some reason will require that the Secretary of the Treasury briefly wear a clown suit. (My fictional plotting skills have let me down, but there has to be some way to work this in). And the response of the nervous Nellies is, "My god, we can't dress the secretary up as a clown!" Even when it will make him a hero who saves the day? [...]

What the hysterics see is a terrible, outrageous attempt to pay the government's bills out of thin air. This is utterly wrong, and in fact is wrong on two levels.

The first level is that in practice minting the coin would be nothing but an accounting fiction, enabling the government to continue doing exactly what it would have done if the debt limit were raised.

Remember that the coin is supposed to be deposited at the Fed, which is effectively just a semi-autonomous government agency. As the federal government proper drew on its new Fed account, the Fed would probably respond by selling off some of its $3 trillion balance sheet. In effect, the consolidated federal government, including the Fed, would be financing its operations by selling debt instruments, just as always.

Kevin Drum of Mother Jones compares this scenario to "fever swamp thinking" on the level of the tea party. But I think Barro makes a much stronger case.

Speaking of which, I loved this post by Barro on why "The Federal Government Is Not a Small Business."

The mistaken idea that federal economic policy should be driven by the same internal logic as corporate or household budgeting has led to some of the worst ideas of the last few years, such as that governments should respond to budget deficits created by the economic cycle with tax increases and spending cuts.

The federal government isn't a small business, and it has different purposes and different constraints than small businesses do.

Amen to that.

UPDATE: Interesting piece on the origins of the platinum coin scenario.

SECOND UPDATE: Yet again, Obama unilaterally gives up leverage ahead of a showdown with Congressional Republicans. Treasury rules out trillion-dollar coin:

"Neither the Treasury Department nor the Federal Reserve believes that the law can or should be used to facilitate the production of platinum coins for the purpose of avoiding an increase in the debt limit," said Treasury spokesman Anthony Coley in a statement obtained by TPM.

The White House has also previously ruled out invoking the 14th Amendment to bypass Congress and raise the debt ceiling unilaterally.

"There is no backup plan," said White House Press Secretary Jay Carney earlier this week. "The only option is for Congress to do its job."

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Narcisse (0.00 / 0)
I genuinely hope Mr. Narcisse is ok.  A San Diego news station reported that he was injured in a hot air balloon accident while on his honeymoon in California.  I wasn't sure if it was ok to post the link.

Narcisse accused me of a pro-Culver bias on this blog because I fight for less than ideal industries that exist in Lee County, but I still respect the man.  He could have really offered a good alternative in the 2010 campaign.  


from what I read (4.00 / 1)
it sounded like he was ok. He and his wife were joking about the incident. Truly one of the most bizarre wedding stories ever.

I respect that he asked some tough questions when most of the Des Moines school board were just rubber stamps.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox