[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (2)
- National politics in 2009 (1)
- National politics in 2009 (2)
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2013
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 25
- House district 28
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

New hope for Medicaid expansion in Iowa?

by: desmoinesdem

Mon May 20, 2013 at 17:29:00 PM CDT


When news broke last week of a tax compromise skewed toward business, I wondered why Senate Democrats would agree to pass that bill without progress toward Medicaid expansion, one of their top priorities. Governor Terry Branstad was saying legislators should adjourn after approving a budget, education reform and the tax deal, returning later this year for a special session on health insurance coverage for low-income Iowans. In my opinion, Democrats would be insane to give Republicans what they want on taxes now, hoping for Medicaid expansion later.

Today several signs point toward a possible deal on Medicaid coverage before the end of the legislative session.

desmoinesdem :: New hope for Medicaid expansion in Iowa?
Senate Democrats have made several concessions in the hope of bringing Republicans around on Medicaid expansion. On May 14, Rod Boshart reported on Republican efforts to push Medicaid negotiations off until later this year. Fortunately, one of the Senate Democratic negotiators quickly rejected the idea.

"We have a lot of work to do to iron out the differences between the House and the Senate and between my office and the Senate on that issue," Branstad said during his monthly WHO-AM radio call-in show Tuesday evening. [...]

"I think it may just take a little longer," Branstad told his call-in audience. "Certainly I think we can agree to bring them back once we get that worked out. It doesn't make a lot of sense for them to hang around until we have the issue resolved. It is a complicated issue."

Legislative Republicans expressed a desire to move ahead with the state budget, education reform and property tax relief resolutions in the waning days of the regular 2013 session, but looking to a special session as a way to buy more time to negotiate a compromise arrangement. [...]

"It's more important that we arrive at the right answer than we arrive at a quick answer," said House Speaker Kraig Paulsen, R-Hiawatha. "We're going to work on trying to finish things up, but it's more important that we've got it right. [...]

"As far as I'm concerned, there won't be a special session," said Sen. Jack Hatch, D-Des Moines. "All of our work will be done here now, it has to be completed.

"We see daylight between the Republicans and the governor's plan. His financing is unacceptable to Republicans and to local governments and to local mental health agencies and providers," he added. "To think we can come back into special session and have an agreement is pretty unrealistic and pretty naïve."

Today, Branstad sounded more willing to make a deal. O.Kay Henderson posted the audio and highlights from his regular weekly press conference.

"...We're going to continue to talk to both House and Senate members about this and...it's just like the other things we've been working on. If we're going to get something resolved, nobody's going to get their way totally."

About 52 percent of the cost of Branstad's "Healthy Iowa Plan" would be covered by state government and 48 percent by the federal government. Democrats counter that by expanding Medicaid to cover more uninsured Iowans, the federal government will cover 100 percent of that cost for the first three years and then 90 percent after that.

"That is one of the things that we're willing to consider, provided there's assurance that if the federal dollars are reduced, the Iowa taxpayers don't get stuck," Branstad says.

Anyone who has followed this issue closely will recall that Senate Democrats agreed two months ago to provide such assurances to Branstad and GOP lawmakers. From Senate President Pam Jochum's comments on March 14:

Following the lead of other Republican governors in other states, we have offered to re-evaluate Iowa's participation in Medicaid expansion if the federal government does not keep its promise.

In other words if it would renege on its commitment of paying 100 percent of the cost for the next three years and then of course it's on a sliding scale that by 2020 it's 90 percent participation by the federal government and 10 percent participation by the state government.

The language we suggested would protect Iowa taxpayers from any risk, and it would address the Governor's concerns.

In short, if the federal government's sky falls, WE will be off the hook as a state.

I want to mention, and we should all remember, that the federal government has never, never failed to meet its obligations to Medicaid in nearly its 50 years of existence.

Today Branstad repeated his desire to "make sure we protect the taxpayers of Iowa against the uncertainty of the federal government." He indicated that only federal officials can provide the guarantees he's looking for.

Republican State Representative Dave Heaton, who expressed major concerns before voting to pass Branstad's Healthy Iowa Plan in the Iowa House, was among those sounding more optimistic today.

Branstad indicated he was "willing to consider" trying to merge the competing plans as long as Iowa taxpayers were protected in the process and certain "ownership" provisions were required of health-care recipients to help improve outcomes and hold down costs.

Rep. Dave Heaton, R-Mount Pleasant, said Branstad's assurances signaled progress to him. Sen. Jack Hatch, D-Mount Pleasant, said he saw positive signs that the governor, Senate Democrats and House Republicans were "all now generally on the same page," a development that could accelerate prospects for compromise.

"I don't think we're that far off now that we're moving," Hatch said. "We've kind of shed some of the old skin, and I think there are some real opportunities for us now."

Both Heaton and Hatch serve on the conference committee working toward a compromise.

Here's hoping U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius can give Branstad a way to save face quickly. Medicaid expansion could make a huge difference for more than 100,000 Iowans, perhaps as many as 150,000 people. A bad deal on taxes might be a price worth paying if Branstad comes around on Medicaid.

What do you think, Bleeding Heartland readers?

UPDATE: According to the governor, the Branstad administration is "moving forward with the paperwork required by the federal government for the creation of the Healthy Iowa Plan" while legislators work toward a compromise. I doubt Iowa would receive a waiver for a plan that covers fewer people at greater cost. In March, Senator Tom Harkin predicted that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services would reject Branstad's approach.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Accepting medicaid expansion (4.00 / 1)
as a "compromise" would seem wise politically for Branstad and Republican legislators running for re-election. The only opponents are hard core Tea Party types, and they probably don't like the idea of spending tax dollars for TerryCare either.

some of them might face a primary challenge (4.00 / 1)
if they vote to expand Medicaid. But I assume most of the House Rs will cover themselves by voting no on any such compromise. They only need 4 Republican votes to get Medicaid through the Iowa House. Anyway, most of the primary challengers to GOP House incumbents failed in 2012.

Branstad's in no danger from the right.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox