Republican presidential debates discussion thread

The Republican presidential candidates debated for the first time today in Cleveland. First, the seven contenders who didn’t make the cut for the prime-time event participated in a “happy hour” debate (some commentators called it the “junior varsity” or “kids’ table” debate). I missed the beginning of that event, but from what I saw, Carly Fiorina and Bobby Jindal stood out. Jindal’s closing statement seemed the strongest to me (if I try to imagine how a conservative would receive the messages). Rick Santorum and Rick Perry had some good moments. Lindsey Graham seemed to give rehearsed answers that weren’t always relevant to the question. George Pataki was memorable only for being the sole pro-choice candidate in a field of seventeen. Jim Gilmore failed to provide any good reason for him to be there.

The Fox News panel seemed determined to go after Donald Trump. He didn’t have a convincing story for why he has changed his mind on issues like abortion rights and single-payer health care. His answer to the question about his corporate bankruptcies struck me as extremely weak and weaselly. On the plus side, he deflected a question about his disgusting sexist remarks by beating his chest about political correctness. He also got the most speaking time–twice as much as Rand Paul, who had the least time to speak.

Paul scored a hit by calling attention to the fact that Trump won’t rule out running for president as an independent. Paul also slammed Chris Christie for giving President Barack Obama “a big hug.” Although Christie handled that exchange well, I am skeptical he can overcome his high negatives with GOP base voters. I felt Paul got the better of Christie during their heated exchange over warrantless wiretapping and the Fourth Amendment. UPDATE: As of Friday morning, a “Vine” of Paul rolling his eyes while Christie talked had more than 4 million loops.

John Kasich staked out a moderate-conservative niche that the pundits loved. I’m not convinced he can become a real contender for the nomination, but he certainly has a story to tell.

I don’t understand the hype about Marco Rubio. He doesn’t impress me at all.

Jeb Bush didn’t speak fluidly or forcefully. I read that he didn’t do “live” debate prep with his staff. If that’s true, it was a mistake. Scott Walker was also underwhelming, and I expected more of a splash from Ted Cruz, though maybe they had some better moments in the parts I missed. In contrast, Mike Huckabee is an excellent communicator. Ben Carson didn’t seem to get questions that allowed him to distinguish himself. His tax reform proposal is based on what the Bible says about tithing.

Factcheck.org exposed some false statements from the “happy hour” and the prime time debate.

Any comments about the debates or the Republican presidential race are welcome in this thread.

UPDATE: Trump’s further insults to Megyn Kelly of Fox News got him uninvited from this weekend’s Red State forum, prompting a typically outrageous response from the Trump campaign. Meanwhile, sexist tweets about Kelly have exploded since the debate. I believe women watching the debate would have felt deeply alienated by how many in the audience approved of Trump’s answer to the question about his sexism.  

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Post debate thought

    Though I only read the written transcript of the debates, one thing stood out to me much more frightening than all the others.  

    Referring to Roe v. Wade and Obergefell, Huckabee and Rubio suggested that the executive and legislative branches have the ability to “override” Supreme Court decisions, ostensibly bypassing the system of judicial review that has served this nation well for more than 200 years.  

    I rarely, if ever, use the term “tyranny” as I feel it is overused to the point of becoming almost meaningless.  That said, the idea that either branch may ultimately override a decision of the Judiciary opens us up to a “tyranny of the majority” that goes against every single intention of the framers of the Constitution.

    There are obviously Supreme Court decisions that I disagree vehemently with, however I profoundly believe in the role of the Court as the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution.

  • your analysis

    Pretty good analysis from desmoinesdem. Look for Fiorina to break into the top half dozen fairly soon. Rubio impressed, as well. Walker and Bush were disappointing. Rand Paul was worse, thankfully. Trump continues to disgust anybody who is paying attention. I hope I’m right when I predict he will fizzle in a month or so.

    And speaking of the distant future, I look forward to the Democrats’ debate. Rumor has it Hillary has permitted DWSchultz to schedule one in October.  

Comments