[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (2)
- National politics in 2009 (1)
- National politics in 2009 (2)
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2013
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 25
- House district 28
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

How are Democratic voters like Jesus?

by: desmoinesdem

Wed Nov 12, 2008 at 09:18:38 AM CST


A leading voice of Republican social conservatives in Iowa makes a surprising analogy in an op-ed piece from Tuesday's Des Moines Register:

Jesus Christ, whom many Republicans claim to follow, summoned his followers to be either hot or cold toward Him, because a "lukewarm" commitment makes Him want to vomit. I believe this accurately reflects the mood of voters in the past several elections where Republicans have witnessed consecutive defeats.

We have followed the misguided advice of "experts" to abandon our principles and move to the middle so we can supposedly win. In essence, we have become "lukewarm" on life, on marriage, on the Second Amendment, on limited government, on balanced budgets, on lower taxes, on parental rights in educating and raising children, on faith, on family and on freedom. The net result is that voters have spit us out of their mouths. [...]

The "elite" politicos and Iowa's dwindling Republican establishment are now convening committees and strategy sessions to advise their "flock" to abandon the party's principles and move even further to the middle if they hope to win again. The voter sees and tastes the "lukewarm" and compromising attempts to gain positions and power. The result is no trust, and the voter, like Christ, wants to throw up.

If Republicans are to win again, they must authentically embrace their core principles and effectively communicate a compelling message of bold-color conservatism that inspires faith, family and freedom.

That is no fringe politician talking. It's Bob Vander Plaats, a businessman from northwest Iowa who ran for the 2002 gubernatorial nomination, was the Republican nominee for lieutenant governor in 2006, and chaired Mike Huckabee's presidential campaign in Iowa.

If you click the link and read the whole piece by Vander Plaats, you won't find any opinion poll data backing up his assertions about why Iowa voters have been rejecting Republicans.

National polling shows that the electorate as a whole thinks Republicans lost the 2006 and 2008 elections because they were too conservative. At the same time, Republicans are more likely to reach the same conclusions as Vander Plaats: their party is losing because its candidates have not been conservative enough.

I'll be honest: I'd be happy to see the Republican Party of Iowa embrace Vander Plaats' faith-based political strategy. I suspect that's a path toward further losses for the GOP in 2010.

Quite a few GOP legislative candidates who put social issues front and center in their campaigns lost last Tuesday.

Vander Plaats does not name any specific candidates whose moderation allegedly made voters want to throw up. One who drew a lot of fire from the social conservative crowd was Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Republican candidate for the second Congressional district. She was a strong candidate, in my opinion, and it would be ridiculous to argue that she lost for not being conservative enough. This district has a partisan index of D+7. No Republican in the whole country represents a Congressional district with that much of a Democratic lean. Mike Castle of Delaware is the only one who comes close, and he is not a religious conservative firebrand.

The Vander Plaats piece is further evidence of the deep split in the Republican Party of Iowa. It won't be easy to heal under any circumstances, but especially not if social conservatives insist on driving their party off a cliff.

desmoinesdem :: How are Democratic voters like Jesus?
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Social conservatives? (0.00 / 0)
Don't get disoriented by the J-word.  Vander Plaats mentioned as many fiscal issues as he did conservative ones.


but being fiscally conservative is not enough (0.00 / 0)
Otherwise John McCain could have picked a running mate like Kay Bailey Hutchison or Christie Whitman. The only reason he couldn't pick experienced Republican women like that was the social conservatives reject anyone who is less than 100 percent with them on abortion.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Which also lends itself (0.00 / 0)
to the theory that remaining true to conservative principles is what wins elections for Republicans.

McCain is known for his centrist stances.  Were it not for Palin, he would have really taken a beating.


[ Parent ]
honestly, I disagree with you (0.00 / 0)
But I suppose I would, because I was raised by a Rockefeller Republican in the Jim Leach mold. He is no longer living, but a number of his friends who are lifelong Republicans, now in their 60s and 70s, voted for Obama.

Republicans need to nominate candidates who are a good fit for the district or the state as a whole. I think ragbrai08 is right--there are a lot of fiscally conservative but socially moderate voters who are turned off by the Vander Plaats style.

By the way, I know a 60-something Republican who voted for Culver in 2006 (her first vote ever for a Democrat for governor), solely because Vander Plaats was Nussle's running mate.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
I have a different take on this (4.00 / 1)
Note where Vander Plaats chose to take this Op Ed.  He'll talk about it on the stump, for sure, but he chose to make his case in the Des Moines Register -- to the conservatives, the Red Star, Pravda, the paragon of the liberal elite media in Iowa.  What this actually reflects is not so much a change in the conservative message (that their message doesnt evolve is a source of pride for them) but rather an admission that the method of delivery has to change.  As Kerry rather lamely observed after his '04 loss, there is a new communications structure in America.  The GOP was on the wrong end of it this time and its dawning on them that sermons the Sunday before the election and anti-abortion fliers in church parking lots combined with AM radio firebrands will not be enough anymore.  They are flailing most for a WAY to communicate with moderates who have tuned out the sources of their message delivery.  Their only hope is to turn up the heat on the culture wars so they can get back into the mainstream media.  It will take a while and will be interesting to watch.  

[ Parent ]
Love ya, Bob! (4.00 / 1)
Please run for Governor in 2010, alright?

The state GOP, if they collectively had half a brain, would see that they did the best in the statehouse races this year with very centrist candidates like Walt Rogers and Nick Wagner.

My hunch is that the future of the Republican party, in the near term, lies in being "libertarian-lite". Fiscal conservative, small government, pro-family, law and order, stay out of my business, ect. If they want to know where the future of the party lies, they should look at David Cameron in Britain and Stephen Harper in Canada...instead of trying to dig up Jerry Falwell and Ronald Reagan.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox