| I wonder whether Barack Obama will ever make a gesture to the millions of liberal Democrats who helped him win the nomination and general election. Now he's chosen Rick Warren to give the invocation at the inauguration. Having Warren there will just reinforce the stereotype that top religious leaders are conservative on social issues.
Picking a respected and inclusive minister on the "religious left" would better represent "change we can believe in."
I understand that Obama will be the president of all Americans, but it seems like he is going out of his way to associate himself only with centrists and conservatives.
Does he think that having Rick Warren there will inspire the right wing to give him a honeymoon? They will try to destroy his presidency from day one no matter what.
By choosing an outspoken supporter of California's constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, Obama is also insulting the millions of gays and lesbians who voted for him in large numbers.
I can't say I am surprised, given Obama's willingness to schedule a campaign event with gospel singer Donnie McClurkin last year in order to make political gains among black voters in South Carolina. Don't expect him to be there for any Democratic constituency if he can benefit politically from turning his back on them.
UPDATE: Todd Beeton and I are on the same wavelength:
The thing is, there's no shortage of progressive Christian pastors, ministers and priests who opposed Proposition 8 and are no less Christian than Rick Warren. Sure Warren may be better known, may have sold a whole lot of books and brings with him the added bonus of sending a dog whistle signal to Christian conservatives that he's their president too, but what about sending a signal to the LGBT community and broader progressive community who, ya know, actually supported him and worked our ass off for him? Reinforcing the false notion that the only real Christians are conservative Christians is NOT change I can believe in at all.
Beeton also has the video of Warren endorsing California's Proposition 8.
Look, I understand why Obama quietly opposed Proposition 8 without doing anything to defeat it. I'm sure he worried that speaking out against banning gay marriage in California would hurt him in a lot of other states. But the election's over now, and he won. He should not give Rick Warren the honor of delivering the invocation at the inauguration.
SECOND UPDATE: This is a hot topic on many of the blogs, with some people mocking the outrage over Warren.
I wouldn't say this is the most important thing in the world. If Obama's other appointments had suggested that he would have lots of progressives in his inner circle, probably many people would be more willing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt on this one.
Anyway, this diary by Clarknt67 does a good job explaining why Warren matters to a lot of people:
And let's also be clear, Obama is not "engaging" the far-right. This is not an "engagement;" it is a great honor. He's giving Rick Warren a grand platform and an international audience. He is endorsing Rick Warren, and make no mistake, Warren's particular flavor of Christianity with all the legitimacy and prestige of the office of the President of the United States.
In fairness I should note that Obama has also giving Reverend Joseph Lowery a role at the inaugural:
Lost in all the uproar over Warren's presence is the presence of another preacher at the inaugural: Joseph Lowery, the fellow who will give the closing benediction -- and who, in addition to being a civil-rights hero on the order of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. himself, is also a friend to the GLBT community.
Click that link to read more about Lowery.