[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
- desmoinesdem
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2015
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 12
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99

Advanced Search

Paid Advertising

Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Boswell, Latham and King vote to override EPA coal ash regulations

by: desmoinesdem

Tue Oct 18, 2011 at 16:47:23 PM CDT

Catching up on news from last week, the U.S. House approved a bill seeking to limit the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate how coal ash is used. Iowa Democrat Leonard Boswell (IA-03) joined Republicans Tom Latham (IA-04) and Steve King (IA-05) in voting for the bill, although his votes on some key amendments suggested that he was not fully behind the legislation's goals.
desmoinesdem :: Boswell, Latham and King vote to override EPA coal ash regulations
The Hill's Pete Kasperowicz recently provided background on H.R. 2273, the Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act:

The EPA in 2010 put out two draft proposals for regulating the residue left from burning coal. One would set out a uniform plan for regulating coal ash, and the other would leave it to states. EPA has since received nearly a half-million comments on its proposal, and combing through those comments means a final rule will not be ready until 2012 at the earliest.

The bill up in the House next week, H.R. 2273, would allow states to adopt and implement coal ash permit programs, and create minimum standards for regulation of coal ash. The bill would let states notify the EPA that they have a program in place on coal ash, or allow the EPA to run a similar program for states that choose not to set up their own program. [...]

According to the EPA, coal ash is currently a waste product that is exempt from regulation under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and is typically a residue from the burning of coal in power plants.

Physicians for Social Responsibility has compiled useful links on coal ash toxicity. Click here to download a full report on "Coal Ash: The Toxic Threat to Our Health and Environment."

The House took up the Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act on October 14. After the chamber rejected a series of Democratic amendments, the House approved the bill by 267 votes to 144 (roll call). All but three Republicans present voted yes, joined by 37 House Democrats.

As I mentioned at the top of this post, Iowa representatives Boswell, Latham and King all voted for final passage of H.R. 2273. Dave Loebsack (IA-02) voted against the bill. Bruce Braley (IA-01) was absent for the vote, but his staff informed me that he would have opposed H.R. 2273 had he been present. That is consistent with Braley's votes against other recent House efforts to undermine the EPA's ability to regulate pollution (see also here and here).

A closer look at the floor debate on October 14 suggests that Boswell was not 100 percent behind Republican efforts to undermine EPA regulation of coal ash. Like most House Democrats, Boswell voted for four of the five Democratic amendments rejected by recorded votes:

Henry Waxman's effort "to require state programs to meet a legal standard of protection to ensure that human health and the environment are protected";

Ed Markey's effort "to establish a time frame for bringing existing surface impoundments into compliance with revised criteria for design, groundwater monitoring, and corrective action";

Markey's effort "to notify the public and the EPA and offer the opportunity to comment before a State establishes a program to regulate coal combustion waste"; and

Sheila Jackson Lee's effort "to require the Administrator of the EPA to submit a report to Congress on the long-term impacts of State coal combustion residuals permit programs on human health and the environment within five years of enactment of the legislation."

Boswell also voted for the motion to recommit H.R. 2273 with instructions. (The motion to recommit is usually the House minority's last effort to block a bill.) The only Democratic amendment Boswell joined House Republicans in voting down was submitted by Bobby Rush; it would have provided "federal enforcement authority so that if the EPA Administrator determines that a structure is in violation of a State coal combustion residuals permit program, and the State has not taken appropriate action to enforce such permit program with respect to such structure, the Administrator may inspect such structure and enforce the requirements of such permit program with respect to such structure."

Boswell behaved the same way when the House debated another bill last week to restrict the EPA; he voted primarily with the Democratic caucus seeking to make a bad bill slightly less bad, then joined most House Republicans to support final passage. I believe he does not want to give Latham or conservative groups fodder for 2012 campaign ads about Boswell's so-called "job-killing" votes.

According to Kasperowicz, the U.S. Senate is unlikely to consider H.R. 2273, let alone pass it. The Obama administration released a policy statement criticizing the Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act, but "The White House did not recommend that President Obama veto the legislation as it did with three other recent Republican bills to soften or delay EPA regulations." I would rather hear a clear veto threat against this kind of bill, especially since a GOP-controlled House and Senate could revive the effort following the 2012 elections.

Share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!


Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Blog For Iowa
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowa Starting Line
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats

Powered by: SoapBlox