[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
- desmoinesdem
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2015
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 12
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99

Advanced Search

Paid Advertising

Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

House passes first stage of Sandy relief: How the Iowans voted

by: desmoinesdem

Fri Jan 04, 2013 at 12:40:00 PM CST

Today the U.S. House easily approved the first phase of legislation designed to help those affected by Hurricane Sandy in October and November. The two-paragraph bill (pdf) will "temporarily increase [by $9.7 billion] the borrowing authority of the Federal Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the National Flood Insurance Program."

All 193 Democrats present and 161 Republicans voted for the bill, but 67 Republicans voted against it (roll call). Iowa's Bruce Braley (IA-01), Dave Loebsack (IA-02), Tom Latham (IA-03), and Steve King (IA-04) were all the yes column.

During the last Congress, I would have expected to see King among a group of several dozen hard-line conservatives defying GOP leaders, especially since the Club for Growth had warned Republicans to vote no (opposing government involvement in the insurance industry on principle). After the jump I've posted King's statement explaining his vote. Maybe the Missouri River flooding in his district has increased his appreciation for the national flood insurance program. I wouldn't be surprised to see him oppose the second Sandy relief bill next week, on the grounds that it contains too much pork. Alternatively, maybe he is more reluctant to defy House leaders from his new perch as a subcommittee chairman. I'm curious to see how his voting evolves in the new Congress.

desmoinesdem :: House passes first stage of Sandy relief: How the Iowans voted
Statement from Steve King, January 4:

"The insurance policy holders affected by Sandy have a contractual guarantee backed by Congress that we met today," said King. "Because Congress has created its own monopoly over flood insurance and mismanaged the risk/premium ratios, we have no ground to stand on to deny legitimate insurance claims to the victims of Sandy. I would have liked to have seen offsets, and I will continue to fight for offsets in any future disaster relief bills."
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Roll call (4.00 / 1)
Sean Duffy should not be able to get away with a vote like that, his district has not been gerrymandered enough for him not to be held accountable for such a misguided vote.  Keith Rothfus must not be aware that he won a very close race in 2012, he's got to watch himself.  

interesting how Paul Ryan (4.00 / 1)
moved to protect his right flank by voting no as well. I find it really sad that disaster relief votes are politicized like this. When King opposed Katrina aid, that was a very fringe position--fewer than a dozen House members voted no.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
King (4.00 / 1)
I saw your post about Garrett.  I would hope this situation makes him more reflective on future situations that are going to happen around the country and the globe.  Somehow I doubt it.  I wish he would run for Lautenberg's seat and get creamed, but he's too sensible to do that.  

King gets particularly delusional from time to time, we all know he loves to go on the national radio/tv shows in order to make an ideological point.  There was serious discussion by numerous Congressional reps about not re-building New Orleans, truly shocking.  It was probably the most shocking stuff I've heard since I have been following politics.    

[ Parent ]
Threat to King? No. (0.00 / 0)
It seems unlikely that the Club for Growth could find someone further to the right than King to defeat him in a primary.

he'll cover his right flank (0.00 / 0)
with plenty of other votes.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Blog For Iowa
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowa Starting Line
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats

Powered by: SoapBlox