[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog for Democrats and progressives in the state of Iowa. Join up, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, and help build up current majorities and keep our leadership honest.
Authors
- desmoinesdem
- Mark Langgin
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (pt. 1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (pt. 2)
- National politics in 2009 (pt. 1)
- National politics in 2009 (pt. 2)
- Add this blog to your list of Technorati favorites
Twitter Updates
    - follow desmoinesdem on Twitter
    Search




    Advanced Search


    Paid Advertising


    Mobile Blog Reader - powered by Notice Orange
    Bleeding Heartland
    It's what plants crave.
    pollution

    New report documents groundwater contamination by coal ash sites in Iowa

    by: desmoinesdem

    Thu Aug 26, 2010 at 11:38:02 AM CDT

    The Environmental Integrity Project released a detailed report today on coal ash contamination in 21 states, including Iowa:

    Days before the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) kicks off a series of regional hearings across the United States on whether and how to regulate toxic coal ash waste from coal-fired power plants, a major new study identifies 39 additional coal-ash dump sites in 21 states that are contaminating drinking water or surface water with arsenic and other heavy metals.  The report by the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), Earthjustice and the Sierra Club documents the fact that state governments are not adequately monitoring the coal combustion waste (CCW) disposal sites and that the USEPA needs to enact strong new regulations to protect the public.   The  report shows that, at every one of the coal ash dump sites equipped with groundwater monitoring wells, concentrations of heavy metals such as arsenic or lead exceed federal health-based standards for drinking water, with concentrations at Hatfield's Ferry site in Pennsylvania reaching as high as 341 times the federal standard for arsenic.

    You can read the full report here (pdf file). It covers three coal ash disposal sites in Iowa: George Neal Station North (pages 26-31), George Neal Station South (pages 32-26), and Lansing Station Ash Ponds and Landfill (pages 37-40). Neal North and South are both in northwest Iowa's Woodbury County. Lansing is in Allamakee County, in the far northeast corner of the state. The report notes that "there are at least five public water wells within a five-mile radius" of all three Iowa sites. There are "25 or more private drinking water wells at or within two miles" of the Lansing site, which also threatens surface waters in the Mississippi River.

    I posted a lengthy excerpt from the press release accompanying today's report (pdf file) after the jump.

    The Iowa Independent blog has reported extensively on proposed coal ash regulations, as well as health problems caused when toxic substances leach from coal ash into groundwater.

    Republican gubernatorial candidate Terry Branstad has said he would whole-heartedly support new coal-fired power plants in Iowa, and many Iowa politicians in both parties expressed regret last year when plans for new coal-fired power plants in Waterloo and Marshalltown were shelved. They should read this report and explain why a few dozen permanent jobs are worth creating more coal ash that will poison Iowans' drinking water for decades. Coal combustion in power plants is also "one of the nation's largest sources of air pollutants that damage cardiovascular and respiratory health and threaten healthy child development."

    There's More... :: (0 Comments, 1116 words in story)

    So-called energy package a disgrace for Democrats

    by: desmoinesdem

    Fri Jul 23, 2010 at 06:00:00 AM CDT

    If the "energy package" about to emerge in the Senate looks anything like what Kate Sheppard is hearing, Senate Democrats should be ashamed. I threw in the towel on the climate bill a long time ago, because it was clear no serious attempt to address global warming could gain 60 votes in the Senate. Still, I thought some decent provisions might survive in a scaled-back energy bill.

    Not so, according to Sheppard, who's among the best reporters covering climate legislation. Sources from "several Senate offices" told her what's likely to be in the new bill, and what will be conspicuously absent:

    Obviously, there's no carbon cap, that much we already knew. But there's also no other major energy efficiency standards, and, perhaps most importantly, no renewable electricity standard -not even the weak one included in the energy bill last year. [...]

    Senate aides hoping to put a positive spin on the package note that it at least does not include any of the really bad measures that progressive senators were worried about, including major incentives for coal and nuclear power and the elimination of the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

    Are we supposed to be impressed that the largest Democratic Senate majority in decades won't press ahead with "really bad measures" for the environment?

    For all of President Barack Obama's talk about our clean energy future, we won't even get a renewable electricity standard to boost wind and solar production. We won't get new energy efficiency standards, even though reducing demand for electricity tends to be faster and cheaper than building new facilities to generate electricity.

    The American Wind Energy Association put out an action alert urging people to contact their senators demanding a renewable electricity standard in the energy bill. If you are so inclined, you can contact your senators through this page. I will contact the offices of Tom Harkin and Chuck Grassley, although doing so probably won't accomplish anything.

    This disgrace gives me yet another reason not to donate to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in the future. I don't plan to waste my money or volunteer time on Organizing for America either. Obama failed to use his bully pulpit to produce a good climate bill and made stupid concessions to polluting industries along the way. He's so afraid of losing a legislative battle that he didn't even fight the good fight. But when he signs this worthless energy bill, he'll probably declare victory in a very inspiring speech.

    UPDATE: How pathetic--a White House official provides a blind quote to Politico blaming environmental groups for the Senate's failure to pass a broad climate bill:

    "They didn't deliver a single Republican," the official told POLITICO. "They spent like $100 million and they weren't able to get a single Republican convert on the bill."

    Poor Mr. President. He could have delivered on one of his major campaign promises if the environmentalists hadn't let him down.

    SECOND UPDATE: I couldn't agree more with Transportation 4 America: "With the Senate backing down on a real climate bill, it's more important than ever that next transport bill helps make climate progress."

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    Francis Thicke's "New Vision for Food and Agriculture" in Iowa

    by: desmoinesdem

    Tue Jun 29, 2010 at 07:33:26 AM CDT

    Democratic candidate for Iowa Secretary of Agriculture Francis Thicke is touring the state to talk about his just-published book, "A New Vision for Food and Agriculture." He's scheduled to speak in Oskaloosa on June 29, Marion on June 30, Storm Lake on July 1, Dubuque on July 6 and Mason City on July 13. All events are at 6:30 pm; click here for location details.

    Thicke provides a brief outline of his vision on his campaign website:

       * Encourage the installation of farmer-owned, mid-size wind turbines on farms all across Iowa, to power farms, and help to power the rest of Iowa. I will lead in advocating feed-in tariffs, which are agreements with power companies that will allow farmers to sell their excess power, finance their turbines, and make a profit from their power generation.
       * Make Iowa farms more energy self-sufficient and put more biofuel profits in farmers' pockets by refocusing Iowa's biofuel investment on new technologies that will allow farmers to produce biofuels on the farm to power farm equipment, and sell the excess for consumer use.
       * Create more jobs and economic development by supporting local food production. We can grow more of what we eat in Iowa. Locally-grown food can be fresher, safer and healthier for consumers, and will provide jobs to produce it. I will reestablish the Iowa Food Policy Council to provide guidance on how to connect farmers to state institutional food purchases and greater access to consumer demand for fresh, locally-grown produce.
       * Expose predatory practices by corporate monopolies. We need Teddy Roosevelt-style trust busting to restore competition to agricultural markets. I will work with Iowa's Attorney General and the Justice Department to ensure fair treatment for farmers.
       * Reestablish local control over CAFOs, and regulate them to keep dangerous pollutants out of our air and water, and protect the health, quality of life, and property values of our citizens.
       * Promote wider use of perennial and cover crops to keep Iowa's rich soils and fertilizer nutrients from washing into our rivers.

    Not only is Thicke highly qualified to implement this vision, he walks the walk, as you can see from a brief video tour of his dairy farm.

    Near the beginning of that clip, Thicke observes, "Energy is a big issue in agriculture. We are highly dependent upon cheap oil if you look at agriculture almost anywhere in this country. And that's one of the big issues in my campaign: how we can make agriculture more energy self-sufficient, make our landscape more resilient, and make our agriculture more efficient as well." It's sad that our current secretary of agriculture has shown no leadership on making this state's farm economy more self-sufficient. Using renewable energy to power Iowa farm operations isn't pie in the sky stuff: it's technologically feasible and is a "common-sense way" to cut input costs.

    I highly recommend going to hear Thicke speak in person, but you can listen online in some of the videos available on Thicke's YouTube channel. The campaign is on Facebook here and on the web at Thickeforagriculture.com. If you want to volunteer for or help his campaign in any way, e-mail Thicketeam AT gmail.com. Here's his ActBlue page for those who can make a financial contribution.

    Discuss :: (1 Comments)

    Weekend open thread: Catching up on the news edition

    by: desmoinesdem

    Sat Jun 19, 2010 at 10:10:54 AM CDT

    Who else is watching the World Cup? I am surprised by how much my kids are enjoying the games, even though they don't play soccer and it's such a low-scoring sport. Des Moines business owner Tanya Keith and her husband have gone to every World Cup since 1994, and Tanya is blogging here about her family's trip in South Africa. What I want to know is, how are her two young kids coping with the vuvuzela noise at the games? It sounds deafening even on tv.

    I wasn't around last weekend to write up the Iowa Democratic Party's state convention in Des Moines. Radio Iowa's blog covered most of the highlights here. Sue Dvorsky of Iowa City is the new IDP chair, replacing Michael Kiernan, who needs to have surgery on a tumor near his salivary gland. Iowa Democrats nominated Jon Murphy as our candidate against State Auditor David Vaudt. Read more about Murphy at Radio Iowa or at Iowa Independent. I am so glad we're not giving Vaudt a pass.  

    Convention delegates also voted to change party rules so that the gubernatorial nominee can choose the lieutenant governor candidate. The move was intended to undermine Barb Kalbach's efforts to replace Lieutenant Governor Patty Judge on the Democratic ticket, and will make it impossible for an activist to do something similar in the future.

    John Deeth has been pretty harsh on Kalbach, suggesting it's a waste of time for her to run against Judge when her own Republican state representative and senator don't have Democratic opponents. I see things differently. Kalbach said in announcing her candidacy, "I am taking this opportunity to represent the progressive, grassroots base of the Democratic Party who feels the issues that they have put forward have been ignored at the state level." Kalbach wouldn't have run if the Culver administration and Democratic legislative leaders had done anything to limit factory farm pollution during the past four years. She wouldn't have run if the governor had done anything to advance the cause of local control (agricultural zoning), which he claimed to support during the 2006 campaign. Kalbach wouldn't be able to draw attention to those failures as a candidate for the Iowa House or Senate in a conservative district. By the way, Culver would have an army of grassroots volunteers now if he had listened less to Patty Judge. He would also have a great campaign issue to use against Terry Branstad, on whose watch factory farm pollution became a much bigger problem in our state.

    Moving to Iowa's U.S. Senate race, while I was away a group called Americans United for Change started running this television commercial against Senator Chuck Grassley. The ad mentions campaign contributions Grassley has received from oil interests and draws a line between the catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico and Grassley's vote for a "resolution of disapproval" that would have limited the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. It's a poor ad, because as Grassley's office noted, that particular vote had little to do with big oil or offshore drilling (click here for more background). In voting for the Murkowski amendment, Grassley was carrying water for big coal, utilities that rely on fossil fuels, corporate agriculture interests and major industrial polluters.

    Grassley has done plenty throughout his career to represent corporate interests rather than the public interest. There's no excuse for such a sloppy attack ad.

    The Atlantic's Marc Ambinder interviewed Grassley's opponent Roxanne Conlin yesterday, and the Cedar Rapids Gazette tried to make a big deal out of her misspeaking on when Grassley won his first election. Rasmussen's latest Iowa poll of 500 likely voters on June 14 found Grassley ahead of Conlin by 54 percent to 37 percent. The previous Rasmussen survey, taken in late April, had Grassley leading Conlin 53-40. I would like to see other polling of this race. The Washington Post published a feature on Scott Rasmussen this week, including some criticism of his methods.

    This thread is for anything on your mind this weekend. Also feel free to post any links to good reads. I am working my way through this article by a self-described Tea Party consultant.

    Discuss :: (9 Comments)

    Iowa & Mississippi: Not the connection some have been talking about

    by: Mark Langgin

    Mon Jun 14, 2010 at 11:18:59 AM CDT

    A lot of discussion has been centering on Roxanne Conlin's historic bid to become Iowa's first female elected to the U.S. Senate.  Iowa has never elected a woman to Congress and we share that distinction with just one other state - Mississippi.

    Yet, this isn't the only connection between Iowa and our friends to the south in Mississippi.  The other is water, and the issue that is beginning to get more attention as people focus on the Gulf oil spill is hypoxia.

    Hypoxia or oxygen depletion is a phenomenon that occurs in aquatic environments as dissolved oxygen (DO; molecular oxygen dissolved in the water) becomes reduced in concentration to a point detrimental to aquatic organisms living in the system. Dissolved oxygen is typically expressed as a percentage of the oxygen that would dissolve in the water at the prevailing temperature and salinity (both of which affect the solubility of oxygen in water; see oxygen saturation and underwater). An aquatic system lacking dissolved oxygen (0% saturation) is termed anaerobic, reducing, or anoxic; a system with low concentration—in the range between 1 and 30% saturation—is called hypoxic or dysoxic. Most fish cannot live below 30% saturation. A "healthy" aquatic environment should seldom experience less than 80%. The exaerobic zone is found at the boundary of anoxic and hypoxic zones
    There's More... :: (2 Comments, 438 words in story)

    Just what the Gulf of Mexico needs: another oil well

    by: desmoinesdem

    Wed Jun 02, 2010 at 17:00:00 PM CDT

    Oil from BP's blown-out Deepwater Horizon well continues to gush into the Gulf of Mexico and will do so until August at the earliest. In response, the Obama administration extended a moratorium on deepwater drilling for six months last week. However, the president also "quietly allowed a three-week-old ban on drilling in shallow water to expire" last week (hat tip Open Left). As a result,

    Federal regulators approved Wednesday the first new Gulf of Mexico oil well since President Barack Obama lifted a brief ban on drilling in shallow water, even while deepwater projects remain frozen after the massive BP spill.

    The Minerals Management Service granted a new drilling permit sought by Bandon Oil and Gas for a site about 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana and 115 feet below the ocean's surface. It's south of Rockefeller State Wildlife Refuge and Game Preserve, far to the west of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that triggered the BP spill.

    Chris Bowers put it mildly when he described the Obama administration's action here as "difficult to fathom." The president gave a speech on the economy today and talked about investing in alternative energy, but like all my parenting books say, actions speak louder than words. The greatest environmental disaster in U.S. history is unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico, and BP doesn't know how to stop it, but it's business as usual at the Minerals Management Service. Nor is today's permit approval an isolated case:

    In the days since President Obama announced a moratorium on permits for drilling new offshore oil wells and a halt to a controversial type of environmental waiver that was given to the Deepwater Horizon rig, at least seven new permits for various types of drilling and five environmental waivers have been granted, according to records.

    The records also indicate that since the April 20 explosion on the rig, federal regulators have granted at least 19 environmental waivers for gulf drilling projects and at least 17 drilling permits, most of which were for types of work like that on the Deepwater Horizon shortly before it exploded, pouring a ceaseless current of oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

    Words fail me, so you'll have to share your thoughts in this thread.

    UPDATE: In 1979 it took nine months to stop oil gushing from a shallow well in the Gulf of Mexico.

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    Group names Cedar River fifth most endangered in U.S.

    by: desmoinesdem

    Wed Jun 02, 2010 at 14:31:03 PM CDT

    For 25 years, American Rivers has released annual reports on "America's Most Endangered Rivers." Only one waterway in the Midwest made the group's top ten list for 2010: Iowa's Cedar River, which came in at number 5. American Rivers comments:

    The Cedar River harbors globally rare plant communities, provides critical habitat for fish and wildlife, and is a popular destination for paddlers and anglers. However, outdated flood management and poor watershed planning are impacting public health and safety by causing pollution and increasing the risk of flood damage. The Army Corps of Engineers must prioritize lower cost, non-structural flood management solutions on the Cedar River. These natural solutions will help reduce flood damage, improve water quality, restore fish and wildlife habitat, and provide recreational opportunities and economic benefits while saving taxpayer dollars.

    Go here to download a factsheet with more information about the Cedar River and why it's "endangered."

    Perry Beeman posted the full press release from American Rivers at the Des Moines Register's blog. Excerpt:

    "We have an opportunity to learn from the devastating floods of 1993 and 2008 and rebuild smarter and stronger. We need to incorporate non-structural, natural solutions that provide flood protection, improve water quality, enhance fish and wildlife habitat, and provide recreational opportunities and economic benefits to local communities," said Sean McMahon, state director of The Nature Conservancy in Iowa.

    "It is time for Iowans to insist that state and federal flood protection policies work to reduce flood damage by moving people and structures out of harms way, allowing the flood plain to perform its natural function to absorb and slow the river's flow during future floods," said Susan Heathcote with Iowa Environmental Council.

    "The newly-organized Cedar River Watershed Coalition has recognized the need to take a holistic approach to watershed management by reaching across city and county jurisdictions to take a whole watershed approach to flood mitigation and river restoration.  This innovative group of concerned individuals and communities is committed to working together to reduce the impacts of flooding in the watershed and to improve water quality in the Cedar River," said Rosalyn Lehman with Iowa Rivers Revival.

    By 2008, the Cedar River had had two 500-year floods within 15 years. Rain falls on a radically changed landscape: plowed fields have replaced tall grass prairies; streams and creeks have been straightened; 90 percent of wetlands have been destroyed; floodplains have been filled and developed; and flows have doubled in just the last half century. Even without factoring in possible effects of climate change, which would exacerbate the problems, the landscape changes will bring more frequent and severe floods. The communities along the Cedar River deserve better, 21st century flood protection solutions to ensure public safety and river health.

    The Cedar River, a tributary to the Mississippi River, provides drinking water to more than 120,000 residents, and roughly 530,000 people live and work in the Cedar River watershed. The primary land use in the watershed is agriculture and the river is a popular place for boating and fishing. The river is home to globally rare plant communities and fish and wildlife, including two species of endangered mussels.

    In response to the devastating floods of 2008, the Iowa legislature passed a bill in 2009 requiring the Water Resources Coordinating Council to draft recommendations on "a watershed management approach to reduce the adverse impact of future flooding on this state's residents, businesses, communities, and soil and water quality." The WRCC submitted those recommendations in November 2009.

    Unfortunately, Iowa legislators proved unwilling during the 2010 session to take even baby steps on floodplain management. A bill much weaker than the WRCC recommendations passed the Iowa Senate but never made it out of subcommittee in the Iowa House. The League of Cities, among others, lobbied against the measure. But don't worry, if any of those cities experience a catastrophic flood, their lobbyists will urge legislators to send plenty of state taxpayer money their way.

    I would like to see more cities adopt Davenport's model for co-existing with a river:

    In a nation that spends billions annually on structural flood protection (and billions more when the levees fail) Davenport is the national model for a more cost effective and environmentally responsible approach. We are the largest city in the nation on a major river without a system of levees and pumps for "flood control". We've never had them.  And we don't want them. Instead of viewing the grand Mississippi as just another storm sewer, we treat it appropriately, with a broad floodplain in (99%) City ownership, now the focal point of our "River Vision" plan. The River Vision plan, developed in conjunction with our southern shore partner, Rock Island, Illinois, is the only bi-state riverfront brownfield redevelopment plan of its kind in the nation. Developed with the extraordinary public input of more than a thousand citizens, the plan is guiding the riverfront revitalization of the historic core of the Quad Cities, and has garnered the nation's "Most Livable Small City" award from the US Conference of Mayors.  In the historic 2008 Iowa floods, Davenport outperformed every city in the state. We even continued to play baseball at our riverfront ballpark as it became an island in the river. In 2009, our unique approach to floodplain management merited review by the National Academy of Science.  A nine minute video of Davenport's resilience through the 2008 floods is accessible online.

    The University of Iowa's Center for Global and Regional Environmental Research, in cooperation with other groups, has organized a series of seminars on "The Anatomy of Iowa Floods: Preparing for the Future." The first of the free seminar series took place in Des Moines in March. After the jump I've posted the schedule and agenda for future seminars in Burlington, Cedar Rapids, and Waverly this month, and in Mason City and Ames in July.

    If you care about protecting Iowa waterways, please consider joining any or all of the following groups: Iowa Environmental Council, Iowa Rivers Revival, Nature Conservancy in Iowa, and the Sierra Club Iowa chapter.

    There's More... :: (0 Comments, 389 words in story)

    Obama having second thoughts on new offshore drilling?

    by: desmoinesdem

    Fri Apr 30, 2010 at 14:31:51 PM CDT

    A few weeks ago, President Barack Obama advocated expanding offshore oil drilling in a misguided attempt to reach out to Republicans on energy legislation. The president told a town-hall meeting audience on April 2, "It turns out, by the way, that oil rigs today generally don't cause spills. They are technologically very advanced." Think Progress exposed the inaccuracies in the president's comments at the time, and the April 20 explosion at British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon oil rig was a tragic reminder of how much can go wrong with offshore drilling. Eleven workers were killed in the accident, and the resulting oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico still has not been contained. If it hits the Gulf Coast, the environmental and economic damage will be immense.

    Last week, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs insisted that the tragedy had not given the president second thoughts about offshore drilling:

    Obama still believes that "we have to have a comprehensive solution to our energy problems," and the spill did not open up new questions about his drilling plan, [Gibbs] said. [...]

    "We need the increased production. The president still continues to believe the great majority of that can be done safely, securely and without any harm to the environment," he said.

    However, presidential adviser David Axelrod announced on ABC's Good Morning America program today that

    there's a moratorium on the expansion until the recent spill can be controlled and investigated.

    "No additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what happened here," he said.

    Mike Lillis is absolutely right:

    For the White House, the timing of the spill couldn't have been worse. If Obama had stuck with his guns in opposing new drilling, he'd be seen as a prophet in the wake of this week's Gulf disaster. Instead, by trying to make concessions to Republicans - most of whom won't support a climate bill in any event - he's simply alienated his conservation-minded supporters to no tangible benefit.

    Senator Bill Nelson, a Florida Democrat, says that any climate change bill including more offshore drilling will be "dead on arrival" in Congress. Let's hope that message will resonates with the president. I also hope the administration will follow through on promises to make BP pay the full cost of cleaning up the oil spill.

    On a related note, Mike Soraghan reports in the New York Times that BP "joined with other oil companies last year to oppose stricter safety and environmental rules" for oil rigs. I'm not surprised, and I'm not optimistic that the current disaster will lead to significantly stronger regulations on existing rigs.

    UPDATE: I posted the Sierra Club's statement after the jump. It's worth a read.

    There's More... :: (1 Comments, 822 words in story)

    Public comments needed to protect hundreds of Iowa streams

    by: desmoinesdem

    Mon Apr 05, 2010 at 10:22:06 AM CDT

    The Iowa Environmental Council sent out an action alert on water quality last Friday. Excerpt:

    As you know, the 2010 legislative session ended this past Tuesday.  Thanks to your emails to your elected officials,

       * we were able to stop a dirty water bill, which would have exempted many farmers from having to have adequate storage for animal manure over the winter months, and
       * final Iowa rules protecting Iowa lakes and rivers from further degradation (Antidegradation Rules) survived their final hurdle in the legislative ARRC committee.

    Also, your emails also stopped the Iowa DNR from omitting hundreds of lakes, and the people swimming and recreating in them, from protection from excess nutrient pollution.

    Your emails regarding these issues made a big impact on decision makers!

    But our work is not over. The third round of stream assessments has been completed by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. As a result, they are proposing to downgrade protections for 408 streams or stream segments!

    Please go to our website at http://www.iaenvironment.org/w... to learn how you can help maintain water quality protections for hundreds of Iowa streams and stream segments.

    It's frustrating that even though Democrats control of the Iowa legislature, environmental advocates needed to mobilize against that "dirty water" bill and lobby hard to get Iowa's new anti-degradation rules through the legislature's Administrative Rules Review Committee. Now we have to worry about the DNR under a Democratic administration downgrading protection for streams when Iowa is already one of the worst states for water quality.

    Please take two minutes to submit a public comment on this issue. The Iowa Environmental Council has more background information here, including public hearing dates and times, a link to a map of the affected stream segments, as well as the mailing address, fax number and e-mail of the relevant DNR official. Comments must be received by April 30.

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    I wish this were an April Fool's joke

    by: desmoinesdem

    Thu Apr 01, 2010 at 15:00:58 PM CDT

    As you probably heard yesterday, President Barack Obama announced plans to expand drilling for oil off the Atlantic coast of the U.S.. Not only that, he insulted environmental advocates and their "tired" arguments against drilling.

    I have nothing profound to say about this decision, but when even a big Obama fan like Oliver Willis says the administration "Clearly Took Stupid Pills Today," that ought to tell you something. Increasing our offshore extraction of oil won't reduce our reliance on imports from the Middle East, and Obama knows it won't. This is just a political ploy to win some votes in the Senate while making the president look like he holds the reasonable middle ground.

    Once again, Obama makes a big concession to the corporate/Republican position at the beginning of the negotiating process, without gaining anything concrete in return. A good negotiator would make that kind of concession to close the deal, and only in exchange for something significant (like a hugely ambitious renewable electricity standard).

    The Senate energy bill (let's not even pretend it's a "climate change" bill anymore) will probably allow more offshore drilling that the president announced, and that will probably be fine with the White House. Environmentalists will be asked to clap louder at "progress" or be grateful that Obama didn't sell us out in a more egregious way.

    I am tired of having to fight this kind of battle when the Democrats control Washington. It's another reason I probably will never again give to Democratic committees at the levels I did from 2004 through 2007.

    UPDATE: I recommend reading this post at EnviroKnow: "Dems More Trusted on Energy than Any Other Issue, Yet they Continue Pursuing Polluter-Friendly GOP Ideas."

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    Massive Iowa Legislature linkfest (post-funnel edition)

    by: desmoinesdem

    Fri Feb 19, 2010 at 07:56:41 AM CST

    The Iowa Legislature has been moving at an unusually fast pace during the shortened 2010 session. It's time to catch up on what's happened at the statehouse over the past three weeks. From here on out I will try to post a legislative roundup at the end of every week.

    February 12 was the first "funnel" deadline. In order to have a chance of moving forward in 2010, all legislation except for tax and appropriations bills must have cleared at least one Iowa House or Senate committee by the end of last Friday.

    After the jump I've included links on lots of bills that have passed or are still under consideration, as well as bills I took an interest in that failed to clear the funnel. I have grouped bills by subject area. This post is not an exhaustive list; way too many bills are under consideration for me to discuss them all. I recommend this funnel day roundup by Rod Boshart for the Mason City Globe-Gazette.

    Note: the Iowa legislature's second funnel deadline is coming up on March 5. To remain alive after that point, all bills except tax and appropriations bills must have been approved by either the full House or Senate and by a committee in the opposite chamber. Many bills that cleared the first funnel week will die in the second.  

    There's More... :: (0 Comments, 5660 words in story)

    Open thread with events coming up this week

    by: desmoinesdem

    Sun Feb 14, 2010 at 19:12:32 PM CST

    I didn't have time to pull this together yesterday, but here's a late weekend open thread. Share whatever's on your mind.

    (UPDATE: If you think you know American history, see how well you do on Charles Lemos' Presidents' Day trivia quiz. Each president is the correct answer to only one question.)

    After the jump I've posted details on many events coming up this week. I hope to attend the screening of the "Big River" documentary in Des Moines on February 18. It's a sequel to the must-watch "King Corn," and the screening is a joint benefit for the Iowa Environmental Council and Practical Farmers of Iowa.

    If you are a Democratic candidate in Iowa, please e-mail me your list of upcoming events so I can include them in these threads. (desmoinesdem AT yahoo.com)

    Oxfam America "is seeking Des Moines area volunteers to lend 5-8 hours of time per week to help them raise awareness of the impacts of climate change on global communities and encourage action to alleviate it." If you're interested, you need to contact them by February 15 (information below).

    Have a laugh at this from the Onion: New law would ban marriages between people who don't love each other.


    New Law Would Ban Marriages Between People Who Don't Love Each Other

    There's More... :: (1 Comments, 2022 words in story)

    Another study finds link between atrazine and birth defects

    by: desmoinesdem

    Thu Feb 11, 2010 at 07:19:57 AM CST

    Yet another study has found that exposure to the weed-killer atrazine is associated with a higher rate of a birth defect:

    Living near farms that use the weed killer atrazine may up the risk of a rare birth defect, according to a study presented this past Friday [February 5] at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in Chicago.

    About 1 in 5000 babies born in the U.S. each year suffers from gastroschisis, in which part of the intestines bulges through a separation in the belly, according to the March of Dimes. The rate of gastroschisis has risen 2- to 4-fold over the last three decades, according to Dr. Sarah Waller, of the University of Washington, Seattle, and colleagues. [...]

    The researchers looked at more than 4,400 birth certificates from 1987-2006 - including more than 800 cases of gastroschisis -- and U.S. Geological Survey databases of agricultural spraying between 2001 and 2006.

    Using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards to define high chemical exposure levels in surface water, they found that the closer a mother lived to a site of high surface water contamination by atrazine, the more likely she was to deliver an infant with gastroschisis.

    The birth defect occurred more often among infants who lived less than 25 km (about 15 miles) from one of these sites, and it occurred more often among babies conceived between March and May, when agricultural spraying is common.

    A separate study published last year in the medical journal Acta Paediatrica compared monthly concentrations of "nitrates, atrazine and other pesticides" in the U.S. water supply with birth defect rates over a seven-year period. The researchers found, "Elevated concentrations of agrichemicals in surface water in April-July coincided with higher risk of birth defects in live births with [last menstrual periods in] April-July." The association was found for "eleven of 22 birth defect subcategories" as well as for birth defects as a whole.

    The European Union banned atrazine in 2003 because of groundwater contamination, but tens of millions of pounds of the chemical are still sprayed on American farms. It has been proven to enter the water supply and is correlated with increased rates of breast and prostate cancers.

    During the Bush administration, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency maintained that atrazine had no detrimental effects in humans. But in a policy shift last October, the EPA announced that it would ask the independent Scientific Advisory Panel to conduct a thorough scientific review of atrazine's "potential cancer and non-cancer effects on humans," including "its potential association with birth defects, low birth weight, and premature births." The panel will also evaluate research on "atrazine's potential effects on amphibians and aquatic ecosystems." Conventional agriculture groups aren't waiting for the results of the review; they are already lobbying the EPA not to restrict or ban the use of atrazine.

    I'd have more respect for the "pro-life" movement if they supported restrictions on chemicals that threaten babies in the womb. I don't think I have ever heard an anti-abortion activist railing against atrazine or pesticides that can cause spontaneous abortions, though.

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    One step forward, two steps back on Iowa water quality?

    by: desmoinesdem

    Wed Feb 10, 2010 at 07:00:00 AM CST

    I seem to have jinxed things by praising Democratic state legislators who allowed the Iowa Department of Natural Resources' new clean water rules to go forward this week.

    I learned yesterday from Iowa CCI, 1000 Friends of Iowa and the Iowa Environmental Council that a horrible bill, House File 2324, is being fast-tracked through the Iowa House. This bill was introduced to the House Agriculture Committee on Monday afternoon, and on Tuesday it was unanimously approved by a subcommittee and then the full House Agriculture Committee. An action alert from the Iowa Environmental Council explains the substance:

    DNR has proposed rules that would require existing facilities need to have at least 100 days of storage, in order to qualify for an emergency exemption for winter application because of full storage structures.  But HF 2324 exempts confinement feeding operations constructed before July 1, 2009 from this rule.  Specifically the bill states:

    "A confinement feeding operation constructed before July 1, 2009, and not expanded after that date is not required to construct or expand a manure storage structure to comply with this section."  

    Lack of adequate manure storage during winter months is a major cause of water pollution in Iowa.  Without adequate storage, farmers apply the manure to frozen or snow-covered farm fields, risking run-off into nearby streams at the first thaw or rain.

    From a statement issued by Iowa CCI:

    Iowa already suffers from some of the worst water quality in the nation. High levels of ammonia pollution all across Iowa were traced back to manure application on frozen and snow-covered ground. This bill would gut the state law that bans the spreading of manure on frozen and snow-covered ground by exempting more than 5,500 factory farms that were built before July 1, 2009 due to a lack of storage for their manure.

    "Poor manure management is not an emergency," [CCI Executive Director Hugh] Espey said.

    The Environmental Protection Agency came down strongly in favor of a ban without exceptions last year.  Passage of this new legislation would be a clear violation of the Clean Water Act and would also undermine the Iowa Department of Natural Resources' authority to regulate factory farms.

    Shame on the members of the House Agriculture Committee for fast-tracking this bill. Yet again, Iowa environmentalists have to fight efforts to circumvent DNR rules aimed at protecting the public interest. We should be making CAFOs pay for the harm they cause, not exempting them from reasonable manure storage requirements. But no, proponents want to rush through a gift for factory farms.

    It's a disgrace that a legislative committee unanimously recommended this bill, especially in a Democratic-controlled legislature. This kind of thing is one reason why I have stopped donating to the House and Senate Democratic leadership committees.

    Last year many legislators tried to circumvent the DNR's rule-making on the application of manure on frozen ground, prompting several Iowa non-profits to spend staff time and energy mobilizing against the bad bill. By a minor miracle, last-minute amendments greatly improved that bill before it passed in the closing days of the 2009 session.

    The Iowa Environmental Council makes it easy for you to send an e-mail urging your state legislators to vote down HF 2324. But some lawmakers don't read all their e-mail, so I recommend calling your representative as well. The House switchboard is 515-281-3221.  

    UPDATE: Adam Mason of Iowa CCI informed me that another bad bill, House File 2365, was introduced in the House Agriculture Committee yesterday. It would change the definition of a "residence" in proximity to a CAFO, excluding homes that are "off the grid." Iowa law restricts how close factory farms can be to residences, but this bill would make it harder for some homeowners to fight a factory farm permit. So far HF 2365 hasn't received subcommittee or full committee approval, but it bears watching.

    SECOND UPDATE: There is also an Iowa Senate version of the bill that would undermine regulations on winter spreading of manure: it's Senate File 2229. It was referred to a subcommittee on February 9, but no further action has been taken as of February 14.  

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    Good news for Iowa water quality (for once)

    by: desmoinesdem

    Mon Feb 08, 2010 at 15:39:46 PM CST

    State legislators have allowed clean water "anti-degradation" rules to stand, a step toward filling a significant hole in Iowa's water quality regulations. A last-ditch effort by Republicans failed to win enough votes on the Iowa legislature's Administrative Rules Review Committee (ARRC) to set aside rules adopted by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.

    I've joked that the ARRC's unofficial motto is "Where good rules go to die," because on several occasions the committee has rejected rules oriented toward environmental protection. Today Republican Senator Merlin Bartz tried to keep that tradition going with a motion to object to the new water quality rules. However, only Bartz's three fellow Republicans on the committee (Senator James Seymour and State Representatives Dave Heaton and Linda Upmeyer) voted for rejecting the DNR's rules. The six Democrats on the ARRC (Senators Wally Horn, Jack Kibbie and Tom Courtney, and State Representatives Marcella Frevert, Tyler Olson and Nathan Reichert) all voted against Bartz'a resolution.

    Governor Chet Culver's chief legal counsel, Jim Larew, spoke in favor of the rules at today's ARRC hearing, saying they would help Iowa reverse the trend of declining water quality. Unfortunately, we've got a long way to go on this front. Further regulation of pollution is warranted, but the political will to accomplish that is currently absent in the state legislature.

    Several non-profit organizations deserve special recognition today. Without their efforts, the DNR might not have moved forward to adopt the anti-degradation rules, as required by the Clean Water Act. The Iowa Environmental Council issued a release today with more background and details about the anti-degradation rules. Excerpt:

    With the passage of the federal Clean Water Act in 1972 states were required to enact Antidegradation rules to prevent the further pollution of lakes, rivers and streams in the nation by 1985.  Iowa adopted rules but the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency informed Iowa that its rules violated federal law as early as 1997.  

    Repeated delays in rewriting the rules led a coalition of environmental organizations - Iowa Environmental Council, Hawkeye Fly Fishing Association, the Iowa Chapter of the Sierra Club and the Environmental Law & Policy Center - to file a Petition for Rulemaking with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources in 2007 requesting that the State act immediately to adopt antidegradation implementation rules.  This action initiated a rule-making process that included several opportunities for public comment and a hearing before the Iowa Environmental Protection Commission, which approved the revised rules in December of last year. Monday's meeting of the legislative Administrative Rules and Review Committee marked the final step in the decades-long process.

    The full text of the press release is after the jump.

    Thanks again to the Iowa Environmental Council, the Hawkeye Fly Fishing Association, the Sierra Club Iowa chapter, and the Environmental Law and Policy Center.

    UPDATE: I've added the press release from the Sierra Club's Iowa chapter after the jump.

    There's More... :: (0 Comments, 832 words in story)

    Weekend open thread with events coming up this week

    by: desmoinesdem

    Sun Jan 17, 2010 at 07:22:30 AM CST

    The Iowa caucuses take place this Saturday, January 23, beginning at 1 pm. Democrats can click here and enter your zip code to find your caucus location. If you've never attended an off-year caucus, I recommend the experience as a way to meet some of the most committed activists in your precinct and have input on the party platform and party machinery. Polk County Democratic Party executive director Tamyra Harrison explained the benefits of attending an off-year caucus in more detail here. The level of energy and excitement won't match the 2008 caucus, but on the plus side, you won't be packed like sardines into a stuffy room.

    Some non-profit advocacy organizations have drafted resolutions for supporters to offer at their precinct caucuses. If adopted, these resolutions will be forwarded to the county platform committee. For example, 1000 Friends of Iowa is encouraging supporters to offer this resolution on responsible land use.

    This thread is for discussing anything on your mind this weekend.

    There are Martin Luther King Jr. remembrances going on in many Iowa cities today and tomorrow; check your local news outlet for details. To mark King's birthday, Democratic Senate candidate Bob Krause pledged to develop "a comprehensive strategy for alleviating the Iowa incarceration disparity," in light of the fact that "Iowa has a per capita incarceration rate for blacks that is fourteen times the incarceration rate for whites."

    I appreciated this letter to the editor by Frank McCammond of Redfield, which the Des Moines Register published on January 15:

    Marian Riggs Gelb's Jan. 3 guest column ("Protect Iowa's Liquid Gems") calls for thank-you notes to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources for designating a few streams in northeast Iowa for protection as "outstanding waters."

    It was a nice suggestion. However, where do I write the note about letting the rest of the state's river systems be turned into open sewers by the farm and livestock interests and by towns that won't fix their sewage systems?

    (Gelb's guest column is here, and the Iowa Environmental Council has more information on the "outstanding Iowa waters" designation here.)

    After the jump I've posted more about events coming up this week. Roxanne Conlin began her 99-county tour last week, but I couldn't find any event details or calendar on her campaign website.

    UPDATE: Duh! Forgot Johnson County's special election on Tuesday. Go vote for Janelle Rettig for county supervisor. John Deeth has been providing great coverage of the race at his blog. Lori Cardella is like school in the summertime--no class.

    There's More... :: (2 Comments, 589 words in story)

    Obama's "five worst nominees"

    by: desmoinesdem

    Mon Jan 11, 2010 at 20:49:47 PM CST

    Over at the Mother Jones blog, Kate Sheppard, David Corn and Daniel Schulman compiled a list of "Obama's Five Worst Nominees." Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner doesn't make the cut, which surprised me until I read the short bios of appointees who are likely to put corporate interests ahead of the public interest. In alphabetical order:

    William Lynn, for whom the president made an exception to his policy on lobbyists in government. Lynn was the chief lobbyist for defense contractor Raytheon before becoming deputy secretary of defense in the Obama administration.

    William Magwood, a "cheerleader for nuclear power" who has "worked for reactor maker Westinghouse and has run two firms that advise companies on nuclear projects." Obama nominated him for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    Scott O'Malia, who was apparently suggested by Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell. O'Malia "was a lobbyist for Mirant, an Enron-like energy-trading firm" and lobbied for weakening the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, to which Obama appointed him.

    Joseph Pizarchik, who helped form policies in Pennsylvania to allow disposal of toxic coal ash in unlined pits. Obama named him director of the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.

    Islam Siddiqui, whom Obama appointed to be the chief agricultural negotiator for the U.S. trade representative. Jill Richardson has been on this case at La Vida Locavore; see here and here on why Siddiqui is the wrong person for this job.

    I wouldn't suggest that this rogue's gallery is representative of Obama appointees, but it's depressing to see any of them in this administration.

    In the good news column, Obama has decided to renominate Dawn Johnsen to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, along with five other nominees who didn't receive a confirmation vote in the Senate last year.

    Discuss :: (0 Comments)

    Year in review: national politics in 2009 (part 1)

    by: desmoinesdem

    Thu Jan 07, 2010 at 07:52:32 AM CST

    It took me a week longer than I anticipated, but I finally finished compiling links to Bleeding Heartland's coverage from last year. This post and part 2, coming later today, include stories on national politics, mostly relating to Congress and Barack Obama's administration. Diaries reviewing Iowa politics in 2009 will come soon.

    One thing struck me while compiling this post: on all of the House bills I covered here during 2009, Democrats Leonard Boswell, Bruce Braley and Dave Loebsack voted the same way. That was a big change from 2007 and 2008, when Blue Dog Boswell voted with Republicans and against the majority of the Democratic caucus on many key bills.

    No federal policy issue inspired more posts last year than health care reform. Rereading my earlier, guardedly hopeful pieces was depressing in light of the mess the health care reform bill has become. I was never optimistic about getting a strong public health insurance option through Congress, but I thought we had a chance to pass a very good bill. If I had anticipated the magnitude of the Democratic sellout on so many aspects of reform in addition to the public option, I wouldn't have spent so many hours writing about this issue. I can't say I wasn't warned (and warned), though.

    Links to stories from January through June 2009 are after the jump. Any thoughts about last year's political events are welcome in this thread.

    There's More... :: (0 Comments, 3702 words in story)

    EPA's Climate Announcement is Most Significant Yet

    by: environmentiowa

    Mon Dec 07, 2009 at 14:07:09 PM CST

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today finalized its proposed finding that carbon dioxide and other global warming pollutants threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations, setting the stage for regulating the pollutants under the Clean Air Act.  The landmark announcement comes as world leaders kick off two weeks of negotiations in Copenhagen on a global climate treaty.

    “This is the most significant step the federal government has taken on global warming.  The Clean Air Act is tried and true.  It has a nearly 40-year track record of cost-effectively cutting dangerous pollution to protect our health and environment.  EPA can now put this proven law to work as one critical tool in the fight against global warming,” said Eric Nost, fellow at Environment Iowa.

    More than two and a half years ago, the Supreme Court ordered the EPA to determine if global warming pollution threatens public health or welfare – a conclusion supported by a worldwide scientific consensus.  Today’s action puts EPA on track to take long-overdue steps to reduce global warming pollution from cars, coal-fired power plants, and other large pollution sources under the Clean Air Act.

    The announcement comes nearly a year after proposals to build new coal-fired power plants in Marshalltown and Waterloo were canceled.  The plants would have emitted millions of tons of carbon dioxide each year.

    “The EPA's decision is definitely the next step in confronting Iowa's contribution to global warming. The Senate also must act to set overall pollution-reduction goals and to accelerate the move to clean energy, but it’s up to EPA to crack down on pollution from cars and mega industrial polluters like the state's fleet of aging and inefficient coal-plants.  By improving energy efficiency and transitioning to clean, renewable energy sources like wind and solar, the U.S. and Iowa can both cut pollution and create new jobs,” said Nost.

    “We applaud President Obama and EPA Administrator Jackson for complying with the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision and embracing the basic facts on global warming that scientists around the world have acknowledged for years,” concluded Nost.

    The following is the timeline leading up to today’s decision:
    • 1999: EPA was first petitioned to regulate global warming pollutants from new cars and light trucks under the Clean Air Act.
    • 2003: The Bush EPA denied the petition.
    • April 2007: The Supreme Court found, in Massachusetts v. EPA, that global warming pollutants are pollutants as defined by the Clean Air Act, and held that EPA mustdetermine whether these pollutants from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.
    • December 2007: The EPA prepared a proposal finding that global warming pollutants endanger public welfare, but the Bush White House did not allow the proposal to be released.
    • April 2009: The EPA released its proposed finding, which the agency is finalizing today.
    ###

    Environment Iowa is a citizen-funded environmental advocacy organization that works to protect the state's clean air, clean water, and open spaces.
    Discuss :: (1 Comments)

    Events coming up during the next two weeks

    by: desmoinesdem

    Sun Nov 08, 2009 at 16:12:32 PM CST

    Last month was so busy that I didn't manage to post any event calendars here, but I am back on duty now. The highlight of this month for Democrats is the Iowa Democratic Party's Jefferson-Jackson Dinner on Saturday, November 21, featuring Vice President Joe Biden. You can buy tickets online.

    Please note that November 10 is the deadline for public comments to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources about protecting our Outstanding Iowa Waters. The Farm Bureau is mobilizing public comments against these regulations. The DNR needs to hear from Iowans committed to preserving our highest-quality waterways. Click here for background and an easy to use comment form.

    State Senator Staci Appel will officially announce her re-election campaign on November 12, and I've posted details about a fundraiser for her campaign below the fold. Appel's Republican opponent, State Representative Kent Sorenson, is already gearing up for next year's election. He spent the weekend in Texas attending the WallBuilders ProFamily Legislators Conference. Here's some background on David Barton's vision for America, chock full of Biblical interpretations supporting right-wing public policies. Barton spoke to the Iowa Christian Alliance not long ago (click that link to watch videos). Former presidential candidate Ron Paul is headlining a fundraiser for Sorenson on November 14, by the way.

    Many more event details are after the jump. As always, please post a comment about anything I've left out, or send me an e-mail (desmoinesdem AT yahoo.com).

    There's More... :: (0 Comments, 2187 words in story)
    Next >>
    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    Iowa Liberal Blogs
    - Ames Progressive
    - Blog For Iowa
    - Common Iowan
    - Iowa Independent
    - IowaDemocrat
    - Iowa Guy
    - Iowa Liberal
    - Iowa Progress
    - John Deeth
    - Lefty Blogs Iowa
    - Political Fallout
    - Popular Progressive
    Iowa Conservative Blogs
    - Hawkeye Review
    - Hawkeye GOP
    - Iowa Defense Alliance
    - Questions, Comments & Insults
    - The Bean Walker
    - The Iowa Republican
    - The Real Sporer
    Iowa Hybrid Political Blogs
    - Essential Estrogen
    - God, Politics and Rock 'n' Roll
    Political Journalists' Blogs
    - 24-Hour Dorman (Todd Dorman)
    - Covering Iowa Politics (Cedar Rapids Gazette/Lee Enterprises staff)
    - Iowa Insider (Charlotte Eby)
    - Iowa Political Alert (Douglas Burns)
    - IowaPolitics.com (Lynn Campbell)
    - Iowa Politics Insider (Des Moines Register staff)
    - On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
    - Politically Speaking (Bret Hayworth)
    - Price of Politics, etc. (Dave Price)
    - Radio Iowa blog (O.Kay Henderson)
    Iowa Democrats
    - Chet Culver (Governor)
    - Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
    - Bruce Braley (IA-01)
    - Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
    - Leonard Boswell (IA-03)
    - Iowa Democratic Party
    - Iowa House Democrats
    - Iowa Senate Democrats
    - Iowa 4th District Democrats
    - Iowa 5th District Democrats
    - Francis Thicke for Secretary of Agriculture
    - Roxanne Conlin for U.S. Senate
    - Tom Fiegen for U.S. Senate
    - Bob Krause for U.S. Senate
    - Bill Maske for Congress (IA-04)
    - Matt Campbell for Congress (IA-05)
    - Mike Denklau for Congress (IA-05)
    County Democrats
    - County chairs list at IDP site
    - Iowa 4th District Democrats (includes contact info for county chairs)
    - Iowa 5th District Democrats (includes contact info for county officers)
    - Allamakee County Democrats
    - Appanoose County Democrats
    - Black Hawk County Democrats
    - Boone County Democrats
    - Bremer County Democrats
    - Buena Vista County Democrats
    - Carroll County Democrats
    - Cedar County Democrats
    - Clinton County Democrats
    - Dubuque County Democrats
    - Emmet County Democrats
    - Fayette County Democrats
    - Hardin County Democrats
    - Harrison County Democrats
    - Henry County Democrats
    - Jackson County Democrats
    - Jefferson County Democrats
    - Johnson County Democrats
    - Linn County Democrats
    - Marion County Democrats
    - Monona County Democrats
    - Muscatine County Democrats
    - Page County Democrats
    - Pocahontas County Democrats
    - Polk County Democrats
    - Scott County Democrats
    - Story County Democrats
    - Tama County Democrats
    - Wapello County Democrats
    - Warren County Democrats
    - Washington County Democrats
    - Woodbury County Democrats
    Statistics




     
    Powered by: SoapBlox