[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Harkin, Grassley vote no as Senate passes defense authorization bill

by: desmoinesdem

Sat Dec 22, 2012 at 23:40:00 PM CST


Earlier this month, U.S. Senators Chuck Grassley and Tom Harkin both voted for the Senate's version of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2013. But on Friday the Iowans were among just 14 senators to oppose passage of the final conference agreement on the defense authorization bill.  
desmoinesdem :: Harkin, Grassley vote no as Senate passes defense authorization bill
The Senate unanimously approved its version of the defense authorization bill in early December, and the conference committee report easily passed on Friday by 81 votes to 14 (roll call). The opponents included seven members of the Democratic caucus and seven Republicans.

Several people who voted no on final passage objected to language regarding U.S. citizens' right to a trial. Some civil libertarians believed that even the original Senate language wasn't explicit enough in protecting habeas corpus rights, and the conference report watered down that language, as Ramsey Cox reported for The Hill.

The House-passed bill affirmed that U.S. citizens have habeas corpus rights on U.S. soil, while the Senate bill said U.S. citizens could not be held under military detention indefinitely. The compromise language says nothing in last year's NDAA or the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) would prevent the constitutional rights of those captured on U.S. soil from being infringed upon, but there was still some opposition saying the language wasn't enough.

Harkin's press release of December 21 makes clear that this issue changed his vote on the defense authorization bill.

"As a United States Senator, I have no greater responsibility than to work to ensure our nation's security.  Our Armed Forces must have the tools they need to keep our country safe.  That is why I support the vast majority of the provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act and why I supported the bill that passed the Senate.  Yet I oppose this conference report because I do not believe it adequately reflects our principles.  I believe we can do a better job of protecting our national security without compromising important values than what is contained in this legislation.  

"This bill fails to make clear that under no circumstance can an American citizen be detained indefinitely without trial.  Moreover, the bill would make it much more difficult to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay.  To overcome terrorism, we must stay true to our highest values and insist on legal safeguards that are the very basis of our system of government and freedom."

Grassley did not issue a press release explaining his vote against the defense authorization bill. Earlier this week, he complained that the conference committee removed language that was supposed to protect the Air National Guard's 132nd Fighter Wing based in Des Moines.

Normally when there is agreement between the two chambers on a policy issue, it is a foregone conclusion the provisions will be become law, said Grassley, R-Ia. But in this case, House-Senate negotiators rewrote the $633 billion defense authorization bill this week to eliminate the Des Moines-based F-16 warplanes, which have seen duty in the skies over both Afghanistan and Iraq.

"It is a real submarine torpedoing of something that is entirely unjustified," Grassley said. "The actions aren't justified for something that is very justified because of the cost-effectiveness of what the F-16s in Des Moines contribute to national defense."

Under the congressional conference committee report expected to be approved as early as today by the U.S. House, all 21 F-16 aircraft assigned to the 132nd Fighter Wing in Des Moines will be retired. It's expected the Iowa Air National Guard wing will be converted into a unit that remotely controls unmanned aircraft, although the aircraft probably won't be based in Des Moines.

However, the Des Moines base will remain open, and it's believed only about 32 positions would be eliminated among about 1,000 full-time and part-time airmen's positions with the 132nd Fighter Wing. But many airmen will need to be retrained for new military occupational specialties, and some might transfer to other air units, officials said.

For the first time that I can remember, the entire U.S. House delegation from Iowa opposed a defense authorization bill when the House passed the conference report on Thursday. Those who released statements explaining their votes sharply criticized the conference committee's action regarding the Air National Guard unit based in Des Moines. I understand why members of Congress are particularly concerned about the local angle, but I find it a little depressing that none of the five Iowans in the U.S. House had anything to say publicly about other aspects of this legislation, such as funding for our large ongoing military presence in Afghanistan.

I also find it amusing that the various deficit hawks in Iowa's Congressional delegation have no apparent objection to massive wasteful spending in the defense authorization bill.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta made a last-minute plea to Congress on Tuesday [December 18] to strip out billions in "needless" spending on unnecessary weapons programs, just as lawmakers put the final touches on the Pentagon's budget bill for fiscal year 2013.

In both the House and Senate versions of the legislation, defense lawmakers have inserted $74 billion toward a number of weapons programs "those that have outlived their usefulness" to the department, Panetta said in a speech at the National Press Club in Washington.

"I expressed concerns about the [legislation], which needlessly divert $74 billion over the next decade into programs, equipment and activities we don't want or need," the DOD chief said.

Ramsey Cox noted that President Barack Obama has promised to veto this bill: "But both the House and Senate passed the bill with a veto-proof majority, so an Obama veto would likely be easily overridden." I doubt he will follow through on his veto threat.

Please share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox