[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
- desmoinesdem
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2015
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 12
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99

Advanced Search

Paid Advertising

Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

At least two Iowa Republicans understand judicial review

by: desmoinesdem

Thu May 07, 2009 at 15:57:40 PM CDT

On Tuesday I complained that I hadn't heard any Republicans stand up and defend the Supreme Court's authority to strike down unconstitutional laws.

Today I need to give credit to former Governor Terry Branstad and his chief of staff, Doug Gross, because they went on record supporting the concepts of separation of powers and judicial review, even though they sometimes disagree with the Iowa Supreme Court's decisions.

The details are after the jump.

desmoinesdem :: At least two Iowa Republicans understand judicial review
Des Moines Register columnist Marc Hansen contacted Branstad and Gross for his column published on Thursday:

During his four terms as governor, he appointed two members of the Same-Sex Seven - Marsha Ternus and Mark Cady.

Ternus is chief justice, and Cady wrote the opinion on same-sex marriage. Which had me wondering whether Branstad, as a lifelong Republican, was wishing he could take back the appointments.

"I'm not one who believes in second-guessing," he said. "I do respect the existence of the separation of powers. That's the reason it's not appropriate for me to comment. But that doesn't mean I'm always going to agree with their decisions."

In case you wondered whether Branstad was serious when he told the Register he's not running for governor again, his remarks to Hansen should remove all doubts. He's not bashing the Supreme Court decision in Varnum v Brien, he respects the separation of powers, and he doesn't even regret appointing Ternus and Cady. No one planning to face GOP primary voters would say such things.

To give you an idea how far to the right the Republican Party of Iowa has moved, Branstad was the right-winger when he beat two moderates in the 1982 gubernatorial primary.

Hansen also contacted Doug Gross for comment:

Though Gross disagrees with the Same-Sex Seven, he refuses to take it personally: "The Supreme Court has the final determination in reviewing statutes. Once it's done, it's final. We need to respect that process." [...]

"Bob [Vander Plaats] ought to read Marbury versus Madison," Gross said.

Here's the Twitter version of that case: The case established the power of judicial review - the court's authority to declare laws unconstitutional.

"One remedy is to obtain a constitutional amendment," Gross said. "That takes a while, but our founders didn't want to make it easy."

Gross referred to Vander Plaats because Thomas Beaumont reported on Sunday that "Republican gubernatorial prospect Bob Vander Plaats called for the impeachment of the entire seven-member Iowa Supreme Court after the decision." According to Hansen,

Vander Plaats' people demanded a retraction.

Beaumont found a replay of the interview on the WHO radio Web site and read the pertinent parts back to Vander Plaats' top aide.

Never mind.

Looks like Bleeding Heartland user ragbrai08 was right; Vander Plaats has a little Eddie Haskell in him.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!


Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Blog For Iowa
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowa Starting Line
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats

Powered by: SoapBlox