[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
- desmoinesdem
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2015
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 12
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99

Advanced Search

Paid Advertising

Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Will Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission change policy on new casinos? (updated)

by: desmoinesdem

Tue Feb 25, 2014 at 17:50:00 PM CST

Last year voters in Linn County and Greene County approved proposals for new casinos for Cedar Rapids and Jefferson. But backers of those projects won't welcome the new report commissioned by the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission.
desmoinesdem :: Will Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission change policy on new casinos? (updated)
William Petroski reported for Des Moines Register,

The Union Analytics report estimates base gaming revenue of $82.3 million at the Cedar Rapids casino, but it says $66.8 million would come from surrounding casinos.  It says Riverside Casino, about 12 miles south of Iowa City, would be hit the hardest. Similarly, Union Analytics says the Jefferson casino would generate $33.2 million annually in gambling revenue, and with $31.1 million coming from from other Iowa casinos. It says Prairie Meadows Racetrack and Casino at Altoona and the Wild Rose Casino at Emmetsburg would suffer the biggest losses of customers.

Marquette Advisors says it estimates $81 million million annually in gambling revenues for a Cedar Rapids casino, and it says $59 million would come from cannibalizing surrounding casinos.The report says the Riverside casino would sees its estimated gambling revenue in 2017 plunge from $91 million to $66 million, a drop of $25 million.

Meanwhile, Marquette Advisors estimates a Jefferson casino would generate about $28 million annually in gambling revenue, with about $22 million obtained by cannibalizing the business of surrounding casinos.  This would include $6 million from Prairie Meadows, $4.5 million from Meskwaki casino, $3.2 million from the Emmetsburg casino, and $8.3 million from several other casinos.

In other news, water is wet.

Just a few years ago, the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission rejected applications for new casinos in Fort Dodge, Ottumwa and Tama County despite strong public support. Commissioners determined that those projects would primarily draw business away from Iowa's existing casinos. They approved a new casino for Lyon County in Iowa's northwest corner, on the grounds that it would draw a lot of out-of-state business.

For those reasons, I've been skeptical that new casinos would get the green light. On the other hand, Governor Terry Branstad has replaced several members of the Racing and Gaming Commission since 2011. Last year I heard that casino backers in Greene County and Linn County were confident they would win approval. Branstad has close ties to key figures supporting the Cedar Rapids project.

Any relevant comments or predictions are welcome in this thread. Whether or not any new casinos are built in Iowa, I agree with the assessment two economists shared on Iowa Public Television last year: casinos are generally poor economic development projects.

UPDATE: The Cedar Rapids Gazette's Todd Dorman comments that the Cedar Rapids casino promoters just took "two brutal roundhouses to the jaw."

Backers still have cards to play.

They can play the all-American, competition-is-good card. New competition would force existing casinos to step up their game. That's how our marketplace is supposed to work. [...]

But Iowa's casino industry isn't really a market. It's a cartel that controls who gets slices of the gambling pie, while serving a big, fat slab to state government. In return, state government and its commission watch over those casinos like shepherds watching over sheepshearers. The state has encouraged investors to build large, pricey destination casinos. And the state will do all it can to protect them from undue competition. [...]

Backers here also can point to the casino's role in the city's flood recovery effort. Comeback City, remember? But I didn't get a sense from commissioners I spoke with last month that recovery tugged their heart strings. It all boiled down to those market studies. They would be the determining factors. [...]

If its [Racing and Gaming Commission] members see the studies as a knockout, they may not see a need for the long count to last until April. Next week's meeting in Altoona, when the studies are formally presented, will be big.

Governor Terry Branstad has close ties to backers of the Cedar Rapids casino project but told reporters that he will stay out of the decision:

The governor repeatedly said that he has never involved himself in gaming license decisions "and I intend to do that" in this case, he told reporters.

"This is the responsibility of Racing and Gaming Commission," he said. "They have gone through this before, to analyze and review proposals and make a decision as to whether additional licenses should be issued." [...]

Asked about protecting the state's bottom line - revenue from the casinos funds a variety of state programs, Branstad again deferred to the Racing and Gaming Commission. His role in the decision-making ends with his vetting of appointees to the commission, Branstad said.

"My responsibility is to appoint good people who are fair and will treat everybody in an equitable way," he said. "That's the way I've always approached it. I have never tried to influence or interfere with their decision-making process and I have confidence they will do what they feel is the appropriate thing."

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!


Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Blog For Iowa
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowa Starting Line
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats

Powered by: SoapBlox