Iowa environmentalists, it's time to play hardball

Photo of Allen Bonini at Lincoln’s Tomb in Oak Ridge National Cemetery (Springfield, Illinois) provided by the author and published with permission.

Allen Bonini retired in January 2021 after nearly 45 years as an environmental professional, serving in various technical, managerial and leadership positions in water quality, recycling and solid waste across the states of Iowa, Minnesota, and Illinois. Most recently, he served fifteen and a half years as the supervisor of the Watershed Improvement Section at the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. In retirement he continues to advocate for responsible public policy and actions to improve and protect water quality in Iowa.

I devoted my entire 44 year professional career trying to protect and improve our environment across three Midwestern states. I tried to do that through the policies, programs and advocacy I’ve been involved with and/or led. Some who know me personally know I rarely back down from a fight or am afraid to call out injustices or wrong-headed decisions by organizational leadership—whether in state, regional or local governments or in corporate America (all of which I’ve served in one or more capacities throughout my career).

A select few of you know I believe “sometimes you have to play hardball.” That sums up my view of where we need to go in terms of the efforts to clean up our water and other natural resources here in Iowa. 

My fellow environmental colleagues, it’s time to recognize you don’t win an alley fight by bringing an olive branch, and you don’t take a knife to a gun fight.

Enough “building relationships” with tone deaf, bought and paid for legislators and administrators. (I’ve had to deal with those types throughout my career, most recently during and after my fifteen-year career at the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.) What needs to be done is to wake up the voters to the realities of what these special interests are doing to our state and its natural resources. Because that is the only “influence” other than money these legislators and administrators understand. Money may influence, but it doesn’t get a vote. 

My favorite quote on this topic comes from Abraham Lincoln during a debate on the issue of slavery:

In this and like communities, public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed. Consequently he who moulds public sentiment, goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions. He makes statutes and decisions possible or impossible to be executed.

Sadly, the agriculture interests in this state are successfully deploying this very strategy. So coddling up to these folks will only get you token recognition of your views—not substantive, necessary change in how this state treats its land and water.

The environmental community needs to step out of its comfort zone and start making loud, disruptive noise. We need to stop apologizing for our outrage. And we need to stop tempering our outrage by saying, “Well it’s not all farmers. Some are doing the right thing. There are lots of conservation farmers. Etc. etc.” All that does is let the 80 to 90 percent who don’t give a damn off the hook by being able to hide behind the 10 percent who are true and caring conservation farmers. 

Let’s stop the coddling and settling for the table scraps. We need to start shocking the voters out of their comatose state. We need to get them to join us in demanding real change in public policy that will make cleaning up our water and protecting our natural resources a serious and sober state priority. 

About the Author(s)

Allen Bonini

  • Thanks Allen

    First, a shout-out to Allen. I represented the Sierra Club in a lawsuit forcing the DNR to establish Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for water pollution. Allen had the job of establishing those TMDLs. He and his team not only did that, but created water quality improvement plans, a blueprint for cleaning up Iowa’s waters.

    Allen is right that we need to demand that our legislators pass effective water quality legislation and give the DNR adequate funding to do the job. But it seems like Iowa voters have acquired learned helplessness. That is a problem I wish I knew how to solve.

  • have you discovered some new means of mass conversion and organization?

    I’m grateful for the call to realizing that we are in a costly culture war here that won’t be won by trying to be nicer or simply debating both sides, and that something more direct and disruptive is needed, but how do we even get people with audiences, like say Charity Nebbe who obviously cares a lot about environmental issues or Iowa PBS which along with its many fine nature shows has a local cropaganda fake-news show Market2Market, to join us in playing “hardball” so that we might reach more people and avoid the 100th show on voluntary cover-crops or the like, and how do we convince Dem voters to stop supporting Dem candidates who support Big Ag and the like?

  • Reply to Comments

    Thanks, Wally, for the support and kind words. I am proud of what my TMDL team tried to accomplish during my tenure at DNR. We always tried to create plans that provided the “math and the path” to clean water in Iowa. In the early years of the program we had to fight the push back we would get from the Farm Bureau – that is until we started publishing their laughable public comment objections, along with our dissection of their comment letters, point by point, as an appendix in each report. Once they realized we were making a mockery of their comments, they suddenly stopped submitting public comments. Instead, in the early years of the Branstad administration they attempted to engineer a dissolution of the program by trying to convince the Governor to transfer EPA Section 319 funding to IDALS. Fortunately, at the time there were still courageous leaders in place at DNR who successfully fought that attempted coup. They did this at great personal peril since they were soon after dismissed from their at-will positions. Sadly, in the ensuing years, and to this very day, objections and resistance to our work comes from within DNR – from several successive Water Quality Bureau Chiefs, Division Administrators, and Deputy Directors. So while the general public assumes the DNR is there to be their advocate and fight to protect our collective, publicly owned natural resources, more often than not its leaders serve as shills for the administration and the powerful ag interests that dominate this state and its politics. So, while adequate funding of DNR would be helpful, unless there is a wholesale purging of DNR leaders, nothing substantive will change. They regularly block the good and caring work of the front line staff and supervisors at DNR who are, by and large, committed to preserving and protecting our natural resources and enforcing our environmental regulations without fear or favor.

    As for your lament about the voters “learned helplessness”, I agree, but I think the solution may be right in front of us. Every time we tune in to the TV or attend a local sporting event we are bombarded with distorted messages that tell us how great and caring and noble Iowa agriculture is. How our “family farms” (aka: mostly privately held, multimillion dollar corporations) and farmers feed the world (with unhealthy, high fructose laden processed foods) and save us from the evils of foreign oil (by diverting half our corn crop into unneeded, climate destroying ethanol). It will take significant financial resources, but the environmental community needs to band together, pool those resources, and then produce and distribute a messaging campaign that will speak truth to power and help the public wake up from their comatose state and unlearn their helplessness. And like what we now see during this heightened political campaign season, these messages need to be stark, real, and brutally honest about what industrial agriculture is and how it is destroying our state’s natural resources and future economic vitality. People need to be made to feel uncomfortable about what is happening to their state and called to action to “vote out the rascals” regardless of party affiliation.

    To the second commentor, similarly, if we feel IPR/IPTV need to be more bold and honest about what is happening, then maybe those of us who support them with our treasure need to withhold that support unless and until they start playing hardball with the entrenched ag interests.

  • environmental groups love their niches but even all together they are relatively poor

    I appreciate the historical efforts and information, it’s crazy how people act like all of our state’s problems started with the current Gov. I don’t know where you see the deep pockets on our side to counter the likes of the forces allied against us from international corps to, climate denying regulation killing homegrown billionaires and their political machines? Wouldn’t we have more sway/impact by threatening to remove support from local news sources (papers, radio stations, public tv, etc) that are dependent on liberal dollars if they don’t get with the program and to name and shame Dems (voters and politicians) who work against us?

  • Your post and comment are much appreciated, Allen Bonini...

    As an old-timer who started doing volunteer conservation work in Iowa decades ago, I am grateful for your sharing of views and thoughts, and also for the very good work you’ve done. Thank you!

    I would also be very interested, if you write future posts, in anything you might want to share about environmental politics in Illinois and Minnesota, since you’re in a position to compare those states with Iowa. I know Illinois and Minnesota are more urban and less dominated by ag interests. But I’m sure much more could be said what it’s like to work with those state governments on environmental issues. I think some other readers would also be interested. Maybe there even are clues in Illinois and Minnesota about how to make things better here. Thank you again.

Comments