A draft that is a refreshing breeze

Images of Thomas Paine, Juvenal, and Trofim Lysenko all taken from Wikimedia Commons.

Herb Strentz was dean of the Drake School of Journalism from 1975 to 1988 and professor there until retirement in 2004. He was executive secretary of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council from its founding in 1976 to 2000.

This Bleeding Heartland post offers four perspectives on the dreadful Iowa legislature and on fears of the outcome of the November general elections. Three small doses come from Thomas Paine, known as the poet or penman of the American Revolution; Juvenal, a poet in First Century Rome; and Trofim Lysenko, a Soviet agronomist, who was not much of a poet and even less of a scientist.

The larger fourth dose is the draft of A Social Statement on Civic Life and Faith. The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) is considering this draft for September adoption by the Task Force for Studies on Civic Life and Faith. The text is relevant to laws approved by Iowa lawmakers or pending in the state legislature, and to political campaigns now under way across the country.

The ELCA is one of the nation’s largest Protestant denominations with about 4 million members in almost 10,000 congregations. Iowa has some 400 ELCA congregations with about 185,000 members. (I’m one of those.)

Given the mood of the Iowa legislature, I found this draft refreshing and worth sharing.

But back for a bit to Paine, Juvenal, and Lysenko.

Paine was born in England in 1737, but befriended the U.S. ambassador there, Benjamin Franklin. Thanks to Franklin, Paine came to the colonies in 1774 and was a key person in urging independence and revolution if necessary. Most of us recall him best for this opening line: “These are the times that try men’s souls,” written to inspire George Washington’s bedraggled soldiers in Valley Forge in December 1776.

The full opening is “These are the times that try men’s souls: The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of his country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.” Those words resonate well in times of crisis—like, say, today.

Juvenal preceded Paine in characterizing the political affairs of his time, way back in the first century A.D. The phrase that tried his soul was “bread and circuses.” While Paine criticized the English crown, Juvenal decried the “selfishness” of the common people who neglected their civic duties so long as the emperor kept them content and happy with food and games. (Another observation attributed to Juvenal is “Who will guard the guards themselves?”)

For me, one contemporary aspect of “bread and circuses” would be the frenzy that the news media and we subjected ourselves to over the romance of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce and a football game. More recently, with issues like the wars in Ukraine and Gaza and other worrisome developments meriting coverage, why did NBC-TV lead an evening newscast with a story about the Princess of Wales (and future queen of England)? Supposedly she had doctored a family photo to show her and the three children looking a bit better to mark the British Mother’s Day.

But to not make me the crank of this piece, let’s turn to the villain of our “small-dose” perspectives, Lysenko. He turned science from investigating and understanding life to serving the state. His disdain for genetics as having anything at all to do with the production of crops led Josef Stalin in Russia and Mao Tse Tung in China to enforce agriculture practices to follow state edicts. That resulted in crop failures and the starvation deaths of tens of millions of people—millions in Russia and estimates of 15 to 55 million in China—and in Russia the execution of scientists who questioned “Lysenkoism.”

Given much of the above, it was refreshing to turn to Tom Paine’s “These are the times that try men’s souls” and some of the “Common Sense” —the title of Paine’s pamphlet calling for independence — evident in the ELCA draft.

Speaking of which, here are some excerpts from the summary of the ELCA draft, with minimal additional comment and a few links to topics addressed by the excerpts. Bleeding Heartland readers are well-versed in the work of the Iowa legislature thanks to editor Laura Belin and other contributors. 

EXCERPTS FROM THE ELCA DRAFT

(Article 21) …Power expressed as mutual self-determination enhances people’s lives and is a presumption that should be encouraged and respected by government and others… (Mutual self-determination may sound contradictory, but I take it to mean cooperative, bipartisan decision making which is sadly lacking in the Iowa legislature.)

(Article 26) The United States is not a “Christian nation.” It was not founded on specifically Christian principles, though Christians and Christianity did influence its ethos. The premise of the Constitution and its ratification is that the sovereign is “we the people,” not “we the Christians.” (In contrast, the MAGA movement is steeped in Christian nationalism.)

(Article 37) The ELCA understanding of civic life and faith is at odds with Christian nationalism because the latter seeks to fuse the exercise of political authority with a selected set of supposed “Christian” ideals. It also asserts that Christianity should be a privileged religion in the United States. Such core beliefs represent a political ideology of religious nationalism, whether explicitly acknowledged or not. In its hardline strains, only white, U.S.-born, Christian believers are considered genuine U.S. citizens. Christian nationalists pledge allegiance to their version of the United States, first making the U.S. into an idol and seeing God’s plan in U.S. society as including only those whose religious beliefs fuse with a certain view of that society. (I previously wrote about a bill approved by Iowa Republican lawmakers, which represents the collusion of church and state.)

(Article 46) The ELCA calls for renewed emphasis on comprehensive civics education as an essential element for robust and revitalized civic life. Such education should teach the whole story of U.S. history in its aspirations, successes, and failures so that it might shape well-informed, thoughtful, and wise citizens. (Iowa legislators have their own ideas about history instruction.)

(Article 47) No single solution will reduce the increasing, fevered polarization or mend the damage that endangers the U.S. social fabric as a representative democracy. However, robust civic participation is critical for democratic self-governance, for support of public servants, and for well-crafted policies. The ELCA urges both its members and all U.S. residents to renew their efforts toward such a robust civic participation, guided by concern for the well-being of all.

[And the summary concludes] (Article 48) … May we, as forgiven people in Christ’s church, respond boldly and join all others of goodwill to work toward the aspiration and responsibility of “we the people” through wise civic participation.

And a final word from Paine’s December 24, 1776 message: “Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

About the Author(s)

Herb Strentz

  • I appreciate the reference to Trofim Lysenko...

    …partly because the landscape of my rural township, like the landscape of most of Iowa, is an example of what happens when following political mythology is favored over facing physical reality.

  • have they renounced the Christian Nationalism of Martin Luther yet?

    or their own supersessionism in relation to Judaism?
    “Now behold what a fine, thick, fat lie they pronounce when they say that they are held captive by us. Jerusalem was destroyed over fourteen hundred years ago, and at that time we Christians were harassed and persecuted by the Jews throughout the world for about three hundred years, as we said earlier. We might well complain that during that time they held us Christians captive and ki1Ied us, which is the plain truth. Furthermore, we do not know to the present day which devil brought them into our country. We surely did not bring them from Jerusalem.

    In addition, no one is holding them here now. The country ~dsxx the roads are open for them to proceed to their land whenever they wish. If they did so, we would be glad to present gifts to them on the occasion; it would be good riddance. For they are a heavy burden, a plague, a pestilence, a sheer misfortune for our country. Proof for this is found in the fact that they have often been expt1lled forcibly from a country, far from being held captive in it. Thus they were banished from France (which they call Tsorfath, from Obadiah [20]), which was an especially fine nest. Very recently they were banished by our dear Emperor Charles from Spain, the very best nest of all (which they called Sefarad, also on the basis of Obadiah). This year they were expelled from the entire Bohemian crownland, where they had one of the best nests, in Prague. Likewise, during my lifetime they have been driven from Regensburg, Magdeburg, and other places.

    [pp.265-6]

    […]

    They could not have enjoyed such good times in Jerusalem under David and Solomon with their own possessions as they now do with ours, which they daily steal and rob. And yet they wail that we have taken them captive. Indeed, we have captured them and hold them in captivity just as I hold captive my gallstone, my bloody tumor, and all the other ailments and misfortunes which I have to nurse and take care of with money and goods and all that I have. Alas, I wish that they were in Jerusalem with the Jews and whomever else they would like to have there.”

    Martin Luther & The Jews (pdfs)

  • ELCA apologizes for Luther's diatribes

    Lutherans have long been ashamed of Luther’s anti-Semitism. While reasons or excuses were contrived, apology and rejection were in order. The ELCA was formed in 1988 by the merger of three branches of the denomination. The ELCA in 1994 formally rejected and apologized for Luther’s diatribes. The statement says in part:
    “Though never incorporated into official Lutheran doctrine, Luther’s 16th century anti-Jewish diatribes have long been used by right-wing groups eager to give historical and religious justification to their anti-Semitic claims.
    In “The Declaration of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America to the Jewish Community,” the movement’s Church Council wrote that their members feel a “special burden” because of “catastrophes, including the Holocaust of the 20th century, suffered by Jews in places where the Lutheran churches were strongly represented.”

    Lutheran Church Formally Rejects Luther’s Anti-semitic Teachings

  • thanks Herb it's good that they've thought about it but

    it’s a dodge to say that it wasn’t central to his theology and intrinsic to supersessionism (otherwise known as Replacement theology which has some interesting echoes in the news of our times). Reminds me of the person on Twitter who when Laura was mildly protesting the Gov pushing her faith in her role as Gov told Laura that the Rightwing Christians are “old” testament Christians…
    These particular tensions on the left aside what is it (and who is it) that progressive voters should sacrifice to be more “cooperative and bipartisan” in relation to MAGA?

Comments