A text poll in the field this week is probing whether the recent arrest of Superintendent Ian Roberts is a “convincing” argument against a bond issue that is a priority for the Des Moines Public Schools.
Voters in the Des Moines school district will decide on November 4 whether to approve a $265 million, 20-year general obligation bond to finance the Reimagining Education, Reinvigorating Schools initiative. The referendum needs at least a 60 percent “yes” vote to pass; the district hopes to expand or remodel all of the Des Moines high schools and nearly a dozen middle or elementary schools.
The survey tests two messages against the bond referendum and two supporting it, with a ballot test before and after respondents read the arguments. I enclose below the full questionnaire, drawn from screenshots shared by those who took the “Des Moines Schools Survey.”
Representatives of Yes for Des Moines Schools, a political committee formed this summer to support the bond issue, did not respond to Facebook or email messages seeking to confirm whether the group commissioned the poll. But the results could provide valuable information to that organization, which had raised $105,000 by mid-July, according to a campaign finance disclosure.
Full questionnaire for the Des Moines Schools Survey, conducted by research.net:
1. In November, there will be a $265 million bond referendum on the ballot to approve investments in Des Moines Public Schools. If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of the bond referendum, or no, against it?
(options are Yes, No, or Don’t know/Undecided)
2. Opponents argue that the district’s hiring of former Superintendent lan Roberts – who was in the country illegally, lied about his credentials, and fled from authorities – proves Des Moines schools are grossly mismanaged and can’t be trusted to spend the money from this bond appropriately. They argue we can’t waste more of our tax dollars until these issues are addressed.
How convincing do you find this argument?
(Very Convincing, Somewhat Convincing, Not too convincing, Not convincing at all, Don’t Know)
3. Supporters say the future of our schools is about more than one person, it’s about the 30,000 students in Des Moines Public Schools and the teachers who are committed to their success.
They say we owe it to our kids to pass the school bond so that we can expand career and technical education, improve preschool access, and modernize tech and science classrooms.
How convincing do you find this argument?
(Very Convincing, Somewhat Convincing, Not too convincing, Not convincing at all, Don’t Know)
4. Opponents argue that property taxes and costs are already high enough. We can’t ask homeowners to pay hundreds more each year on our schools when school leaders have proven they can’t be trusted. We shouldn’t spend more of our hard-earned money to fund a district that’s so poorly managed that it hired an illegal immigrant with a criminal record to be its superintendent.
How convincing do you find this argument?
(Very Convincing, Somewhat Convincing, Not too convincing, Not convincing at all, Don’t Know)
5. Supporters say Governor Kim Reynolds and the Republican State Legislature have slashed funding for our kids’ schools for years and our kids have paid the price. Now, some Republicans even want to fully control Des Moines Public Schools. Voting yes on the bond referendum is our best way to stand up for Des Moines students and give them the education they deserve.
How convincing do you find this argument?
(Very Convincing, Somewhat Convincing, Not too convincing, Not convincing at all, Don’t Know)
6. Knowing what you know now, how do you plan to vote on the $265 million bond referendum on the ballot to approve investments in Des Moines Public Schools. If the election were held today, would you vote yes, in favor of the bond referendum, or no, against it?
(Yes, No, Don’t know/Undecided)
7. Finally, l’d like to ask you a few questions for statistical purposes. What is your age?
(18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-64, 65+)
8. Do you consider yourself a Democrat, Republican, or an Independent?
(Democrat, Republican, Independent)
9. What is your gender?
(Woman, Man, Non-Binary)
10. What racial or ethnic group best describes you?
(White or Caucasian, Hispanic or Latino, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black or African American, Other)
Top photo was taken on August 22, 2023 and published on the Des Moines Public Schools Flickr account.
7 Comments
ugh
the poor district had an uphill battle even before getting caught up in this mass media Replacement Theory conspiracy mess.
These sort of priming/framing questions are so maddening as they introduce thoughts rather then gather where people are on their own social-science remains mostly an oxymoron…
“Opponents argue that the district’s hiring of former Superintendent lan Roberts – who was in the country illegally, lied about his credentials, and fled from authorities – proves Des Moines schools are grossly mismanaged and can’t be trusted to spend the money from this bond appropriately. They
argue we can’t waste more of our tax dollars until these issues are addressed.
How convincing do you find this argument?”
Ever more austerity governance will always bring us worse results.
dirkiniowacity Thu 9 Oct 5:44 PM
Des Moines East or Least?
DM area has some great public schools – East is not among them. 64% graduation rate and lackluster proficiency scores. Not sure if their expansion would be a top priority:
https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/iowa/rankings/des-moines-ia-19780
ModerateDem Thu 9 Oct 6:51 PM
No title
I haven’t studied the plan but are you saying that school districts should not invest in facilities at lower-performing schools? Maybe that’s where districts would get the most bang for their buck.
East HS serves an area with much more poverty than Roosevelt, so it’s not surprising the scores would be lower. I assume the expansion plans are related to expected enrollment at the various schools.
Laura Belin Thu 9 Oct 9:40 PM
Roberts lied on I-9. All else secondary.
You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see DMPS needs help in a variety of ways. All now unrelated to the Roberts hire/fire. Des Moines is a great place to live, I’m sure. But the district is also home to a vast array of hard-to-teach students, mainly because English is their second language. All 30000 of those students will be out and about in a few years … years that better matter or they’ll not be prepared for life after DMPS. I’m no longer a DMPS voter, but I still worry about the kids’ futures. Read the proposal before you decide. This board acted responsibly once the bad news hit the fan. Of the volume of 2nd guessers, few live in the district. And their comments have a MAGA undertone, in my humble opinion. The needs of the district will be there after November and get worse, I’m sure, if not addressed.
Gerald Ott Thu 9 Oct 9:51 PM
Early Voting and Timing of Discussion
First, I am glad the discussion is taking place before early voting starts. Second, thank you, Laura. I was expecting you to have information on the group behind the flyers being mailed and you did not disappoint. Third, one of the clips shown on a local TV station’s news broadcast had the person talking for the school district at the first community meeting this month on the ballot measure responded to a question about waiting a year for the measure stating they did not have leadership at this time and did not know what that might mean for waiting. I lean towards interpreting that as a reference to no superintendent at the time, but very concerning response. nonetheless. I still have questions, not necessarily fully formed, yet. For example, are the improvements to buildings expected to last more than 20 years? (I do not like paying for new construction or redesigns that do not last longer than the bond taxpayers are funding.) Certainly technology will change by then, so does the district have plans for using the existing options – e.g., local school tax, specific funds already part of the property tax assessment – to keep the facilities up-to-date? As for increasing property taxes, I believe bond measures for school buildings is needed, at times, and the extra cost to build or repair buildings is one of them; although, that is not to say this particular plan, at this particular time, is appropriate. (I am still deciding that question for myself.) Ultimately, I need to be convinced that the education plan behind this particular bond measure proposal is going to be the plan for the next 25 years and the team that would implement it is fully behind and convinced of its value to the education of students for their futures (and that means more than just jobs) and for the future stability and operation of the community, et al.
Outlier21st Fri 10 Oct 8:38 AM
No title
Maybe you folks missed the news. Dowling High School has announced plans to spend $76 million to improve one high school! New suburban high schools now cost their taxpayers at least $100 million each. DMPS must invest in its infrastructure to get the best results from public education in our district. To suggest that allowing our 100 year old buildings to fall down on the kids inside them in order to teach the school board some kind of personnel lesson is preposterous.
John Morrissey Fri 10 Oct 9:28 AM
No title
Fundraising must be very easy for Dowling these days, now that well-off parents are getting $8,000 a year in taxpayer money to cover tuition. They can just redirect what they would have spent on tuition to the capital campaign.
Laura Belin Fri 10 Oct 8:30 PM