Deaconess Irene DeMaris grew up in rural Washington state, where she often got in trouble for driving too fast down gravel roads in the family pickup. She moved to Iowa in 2018 after meeting her now husband. Irene lives in Des Moines, where she is active in her faith community, enjoys riding her bike, and is converting her lawn into a pollinator paradise.
I don’t always get excited about candidates running for office. But when I heard Wade Dooley was running for Iowa Secretary of Agriculture as a Democrat, I was so genuinely thrilled that I startled my two Corgis.
Since moving to Iowa in late 2018, I’ve traveled across the state, listening to rural communities and learning how farming deeply shapes both our economy, and even more so, our identity. One thing has become abundantly clear: when farmers are empowered to lead, big things happen. Farmers are natural problem-solvers, called to work the land, adapt to challenges, and innovate. They already are, and must continue to be, leaders in climate solutions.
Wade Dooley is exactly that kind of leader.
A sixth-generation farmer on his family’s land in Marshall County, Wade has spent nearly two decades stewarding fields along the Iowa River and its floodplain since coming home after college. His family farm has become a model of what Iowa agriculture can be: improving soil health, protecting our water, investing in long-term sustainability, and embracing climate-smart practices. Wade does not just talk about the future of agriculture; he demonstrates it every single day.
I have met Wade several times, and he has always struck me as salt of the earth, incredibly smart and savvy, observant, and deeply kind. Whenever I come across articles where he is quoted, he is clear, concise, and forward-looking. He invites people into the conversation rather than shutting them out, which is a rare and invaluable quality in public leadership.
Wade has earned a reputation as one of Iowa’s forward-thinking voices in regenerative agriculture. He understands the business of farming and the great responsibility that comes with it. Most importantly, Wade is rooted in authenticity. He listens deeply, respects where farmers are coming from, and helps build bridges.
I do not make this personal endorsement lightly. I work in the environmental space and have immense respect for Iowa’s farmers and rural communities. I live in Des Moines and worry about nitrate levels in my own drinking water. I believe Iowa can lead the nation in climate-smart agriculture. And I have spent years traveling across the state listening to rural communities share what is on their hearts. Those experiences have shaped my understanding of what is at stake and why strong agricultural leadership matters.
Since Wade’s campaign launch, I’ve had the opportunity to watch him engage with Iowans and the media, and one thing stuck out to me: he’s unafraid to call out and call in Iowa Democrats who have been quick to malign our farmers who have tried to do the right thing.
“Farmers are on debt treadmills for the most part. They’re all trying to do what’s best for their family, they’re also trying to do what’s best for their land, they’re also trying to do what’s best for their community, but at the end of the day, they’ve got to make their bank payment,” Dooley said during a Radio Iowa interview.
He went on: “…It’s really frustrating, then, to hear people in the Democratic Party blaming farmers saying, ‘Well, it’s their fault they’re doing it.’ They’re doing it, in part, because they’re forced. They’re trying to save their farms.” Amen.
Iowa faces very real challenges in agriculture from clean water to volatile markets to soil degradation. We need a secretary of agriculture who not only understands the science and the economics, but who sees the potential in rural communities and believes that farmers can lead our state into the future.
Wade Dooley can do that. And I believe he can win our state. Wade has my full support and I hope you will join me.
Editor’s note: Bleeding Heartland welcomes guest commentaries by any Democratic candidate running for office in 2026, or by their supporters. Please read these guidelines and contact Laura Belin if you are interested in writing.
6 Comments
Yeah, no
After working in and around Iowa Ag for, (where does an Iowan mark their beginning?) over 50 years, I can say this; good examples have exactly zero impact on statewide outcomes from agriculture. People keep trotting them to the forefront, and the industry keeps on smiling and ignoring their work. [insert definition of insanity here]
MantenoLorax Mon 19 Jan 9:52 AM
amen mantenolorax
these are obviously systemic problems largely created by Big Ag companies, market-makers, and their pet legislators that can’t be solved at the level of individual farmers making choices for their farms. There is little to nothing about running a farm that equips someone to understand (let alone fix) the related issues of political-economy.
As for “when farmers are empowered to lead, big things happen” what’s an example of this?
dirkiniowacity Mon 19 Jan 12:25 PM
as this excellent reporter notes
“I was in a packed room tonight watching Chris Jones launch his Democratic campaign for Iowa secretary of agriculture.
In this clip, he observed, “So on the one hand we have citizens that are dissatisfied with the environmental outcomes from farming. On the other hand, we have the producers, the farmers, that are dissatisfied with the amount of money that they’re getting. […]
“So why are we doing this? Right? If nobody’s happy with this system, if we’re unhappy with the water and we’re unhappy with farm incomes, why are we doing this?
“Well, it’s because we have these ungovernable multinational corporations. They’re happy, right? They’re happy. They’re making money.”
https://substack.com/@laurabelin/note/c-200518525
dirkiniowacity Mon 19 Jan 12:36 PM
I'll willingly vote for Wade Dooley if he wins the Democratic primary.
But unless some truly seismic event changes my mind, my primary vote will go to Chris Jones. He is bravely telling very important truths about Iowa farm pollution.
I don’t doubt that Wade Dooley is a great steward of land and water. But the Iowa Farm Bureau and other conventional-industrial-ag groups routinely encourage and enable tens of thousands of not-good-steward Iowa farmers and landowners to politically hide behind the very small percentage of farmers and landowners who really are great stewards.
If saying that makes me a Democrat who is “maligning” Iowa farmers, so be it. Iowa farmers get lots of high praise elsewhere, especially from the Iowa Farm Bureau et al. And I guarantee that not all the Iowa farmers and landowners who are declining to do good conservation, even with cost-share (or no cost at all to the farmer in the case of some edge-of-field practices) are declining because they can’t afford it. Talk with some of the people who work in the Iowa Soil and Water Conservation District system. Talk with them alone, off the record.
PrairieFan Mon 19 Jan 12:36 PM
There are some useful comments here for Wade
Dirk raises a key dilemma, and I don’t know if Democrats have a candidate who can reconcile it. PrairieFan raises a great challenge for Wade. So far we haven’t seen much. Wade has support from several Iowa Farmers Union leaders, and is a member. IFU has a large policy platform, but wade hasn’t mentioned any of it yet. NFU has a great proposal to change the farm bill paradigm, (which seems to be left out all around here,) but IFU rarely mentions it. It would save many billions for better uses by mostly eliminating the need for subsidies, (via a return to New Deal style supply management & price floors,) and so it would eliminate most of the biggest CAFO subsidies, (those paid by farmers, and rarely known to exist). It would also reduce corn and soybean acreages, though few know that, in the past, even Republicans did this, though inadequately). The Democratic Party no longer understands the key issues, which is a huge challenge for the right candidate, (and I hope such a candidate does show up). Wade?
Brad Wilson Mon 19 Jan 5:50 PM
MantenoLorax
Thank you for your long-term perspective. I’ve only followed Iowa agriculture/environment issues for about forty-five years. But that was more than long enough to learn that for many Iowa farmers and landowners (certainly not all, but many), conservation stays at the bottom of the to-do list, whether the farm economy is up, down, or sideways.
PrairieFan Tue 20 Jan 1:35 PM