Kurt Meyer writes a weekly column for the Nora Springs – Rockford Register and the Substack newsletter Showing Up, where this essay first appeared. He served as chair of the executive committee (the equivalent of board chair) of Americans for Democratic Action, America’s most experienced liberal organization.
Lines written by Samuel Coleridge 200 years ago, in 1825:
All Nature seems at work. Slugs leave their lair—
The bees are stirring—birds are on the wing— […]
Work without Hope draws nectar in a sieve,
And Hope without an object cannot live.
It’s an early reference to “the birds and the bees,” (although Coleridge inverts the order), a familiar euphemism for a conversation parents should have with their children. But the poet also mentions work and hope, relevant to this ramble since major doses of both are needed for society to address a serious birds’ and bees’ situation—literally the birds and the bees—and their rapidly diminishing populations.
Preparing these paragraphs, I was struck by how often the same words or phrases are used to describe the population drop-off now experienced by birds and bees: alarming / widespread / dire / a looming crisis / steep, long-term losses / staggering / devastating / shocking / ominous / mounting evidence / astounding / urgent / unsustainable / full-on emergency.
For example, I encountered one bird-related headline with three blaring sirens. “Scientists issue urgent warning after alarming collapse of bird populations across the US: ‘We have a full-on emergency‘” This came in response to the “2025 State of the Birds” report released in March by a coalition led by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology. There’s simply no hedging here… remember, this assessment comes from scientists, a profession disinclined toward hyperbole.
A few bird-related statistics. North America has lost nearly 3 billion birds since 1970, approximately one in every four birds. In North America, three-fourths of bird species are declining spanning almost all habitats. Some 229 species are of high or moderate concern due to low populations and now require urgent intervention. More than 90 percent of losses (2.5+ billion birds) come from twelve bird families, including common birds like sparrows, blackbirds, warblers, and finches.
Now, let’s turn our attention to bees, since bee populations are declining at comparable rates. Native wild bees have experienced a steady, significant drop-off; some populations are now endangered due to climate change, pesticides, and habitat loss. However, it’s easier to track losses among managed honeybees. In the last two decades, beekeepers report an average of 40 percent annual colony loss, twice the 15-20 percent rate considered sustainable. Between June 2024 and March 2025, commercial beekeepers experienced a 62 percent loss, with a startling projection for calendar year 2025: 70 percent. Yikes!
When USDA scientists sought to understand these record-breaking losses (efforts hindered by funding cuts and layoffs) invasive, parasitic mites were identified as the primary cause. Unfortunately, in the last four decades, mites have developed a resistance to “amitraz,” the only mite-specific pesticide currently available. Effective new compounds are difficult to develop, especially given reduced resources and personnel.
Mites spread single-strand RNA viruses. While employing emerging RNA technology might eventually generate immunity protection from such viruses, knowledgeable experts report that this potential solution is still years away from being deployed outside the lab.
Bear in mind, it’s not just our nation’s honey supply that’s under siege here. One of every three bites of food we take depends on honeybees for pollination. Honeybees pollinate more than 90 commercial crops in the United States and generate between $20 billion and $30 billion in agricultural revenue. Obviously, honeybees are mighty essential to maintaining a stable U.S. food supply.
So, given these alarming, widespread, dire, staggering, devastating, shocking, ominous, unsustainable trend lines (pick one, maybe two of these adjectives…), what are we to do? Due to the size and dimension of the various challenges outlined above, there’s not a great deal that can be done individually. Small steps, sure, but it’s apparent that larger collective action is required.
Despite our temporary (?) federal government paralysis, an effective strategy requires decision makers in Washington and in our state capitals to allocate research funding and then develop, coordinate, and implement long-term action plans. This is where Coleridge’s reference to work and hope come in.
The birds and the bees are likely to do their part, if we only give them a chance. So, what would you say the odds are of that happening?
Top photo is by Jessica Bolser of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: This eastern bluebird was spotted at Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge in Iowa, March 29, 2017, available via Wikimedia Commons.
5 Comments
Birds and Bees
Hi, Kurt. Important topic!
In Johnson County, we have passed two bonds for Conservation. The public really likes the idea, left, center, and right. (We got 80%, but other places easily pass the 60% bonding threshold.)
You can then preserve local habitat, which really helps the flora and fauna, in addition to water and air quality improvements and flood control! This is certainly not a silver bullet, but it is something we can do locally.
Rod Sullivan Sat 25 Oct 9:01 AM
Wild choice for photo
How unfortunate that such an important piece is accompanied by a scummy, parasitic invasive English Sparrow. My bluebirds are fuming in their house. Someone needs to do better.
MantenoLorax Sat 25 Oct 9:47 AM
No title
I take responsibility for the photo and will swap that out for a native species.
Laura Belin Sat 25 Oct 2:41 PM
thanks for raising the issue, but surely the odds are that we will do (literally) more of the same?
The record to date shows we won’t even act in our own immediate interests let alone seriously reforming our lives to accommodate other species and their mounting (and tragic) extinctions.
Here in Iowa leading environmentalists are calling for “pragmatic, radical centrism,,, find common ground and productively move people along the middle path”, not exactly facing the scope of our crises. Like withe climate change people can’t even seem to grasp how environmental issues work, I can’t tell you how many times people offer localized ‘solutions’ that don’t account for flows of air and water, let alone the movements of critters. Among other things issues of scale seem too hard for people to grasp, so they say things like every little bit helps when of course that’s just not true.
https://newrepublic.com/article/201118/corn-cancer-iowa-deadly-water-crisis
dirkiniowacity Sat 25 Oct 1:21 PM
MantenoLorax
I agree that the European House Sparrow was an unfortunate photo choice for this essay. I have seen them destroy bluebird nests and kill the babies myself, and of course they take over bird houses and natural cavities badly needed by native birds. They are an invasive exotic species, brought to North America deliberately by humans, and they cause serious problems here.
However, the House Sparrow is also in trouble. Below are excerpts from a story by the Cornell Lab, one of the best sources of bird information.
“The European House Sparrow has a story to tell about survival in the modern world. In parts of its native range in Europe, House Sparrow numbers are down by nearly 60%. Their fate in the U.S. and Canada is less well known. A new study by Cornell Lab of Ornithology scientists aims to clarify the status of this non-native species, using 21 years of citizen science data… House Sparrows declined in urban areas but remained stable in rural areas. From 1995 to 2016, the proportion of FeederWatch sites reporting House Sparrows declined by 7.5% and mean flock sizes declined by 22%.”
In the UK, one estimate is that once-common House Sparrows have declined by 70%. Short summary, no wild bird species on earth is safe now from human impacts.
PrairieFan Sat 25 Oct 2:24 PM