Three resources for parents to teach their teens about consent

Last week, a District Court judge ordered a new trial for a former University of Iowa honors student who was convicted of rape in 2012, Ryan Foley reported for the Associated Press. The student had sex with another student on the Pentacrest lawn in Iowa City in 2010. She later accused him of rape, while he claimed the encounter was consensual. Judge Douglas Russell vacated the conviction because “a prosecutor asked witnesses improper questions to shore up the alleged victim’s credibility, and his defense lawyer gave him ineffective counsel.”

I can’t speak to what happened on that night in 2010–the Johnson County attorney later dismissed the charges against the student, who desired to establish his innocence at a second trial.

It’s clear that many similar tragedies could be avoided if teenagers understood consent properly before entering the world of dating and sexual exploration. Young men who rape may see themselves as opportunists rather than predators, like the frat boy who calmly described his method of forcing sex on an unwilling target, seemingly unaware he was outing himself as a violent criminal. Or they may genuinely believe that a woman incapacitated by heavy drinking consented to sex with them, only to be blindsided later by a rape accusation.

Training girls to protect themselves against sexual assault is worthwhile, but changing the culture requires teaching boys and girls what consent looks like. Three of the best resources I’ve found are linked below.

Alli Kirkham created seven comic-strip depictions of boundary-crossing as a thought experiment: “What If We Treated All Consent Like Society Treats Sexual Consent?” Her “much-needed perspective” is brilliant, from the guy who pressures his friend to keep playing poker (“You can’t invite me over to play cards and then not play cards!”) to the woman who tattoos a friend while he is asleep (“You said you wanted it!” “But I didn’t want it when I was unconscious and didn’t know what was happening!”).

None of Kirkham’s scenarios are sexual, which may make parents more comfortable discussing them with their children.

Marie Hartwell-Walker’s essay on “Talking To Your Teens about Acquaintance Rape” points out that parents are more likely to teach children about “stranger danger” than about acquaintance rape, though the latter is far more common.

Acquaintance rape often is thought of as manipulation by the male over the more vulnerable female. But acquaintance rape doesn’t always follow the stereotype. Acquaintance rape is about dominating another person sexually. It’s coerced sex. The force can be verbal or physical, manipulative or violent. Male or female, hetero or gay couple, when one member of a couple takes advantage of the other and demands, insists on, and forces sex, it has an ugly name. Rape.

In addition to talking about consent, Hartwell-Walker advises parents to talk about different forms of pressure (emotional blackmail as well as physical force) that may lead to non-consensual sex. She suggests ways to practice “words they can say and how they can leave,” in case teens end up in an uncomfortable situation. Equally important, she discusses how parents can model respect for their own bodies and their children’s bodies.

Talk about how important it is to only touch people in ways they want to be touched. Don’t assume that everyone wants to be hugged or that tickling kids is okay. Ask permission. Stop rough-housing or tickling when your kids have had enough. Your kids are watching.

That modeling should begin well before the teenage years. The Everyday Feminism website published an outstanding guide on “Healthy Sex Talk: Teaching Kids Consent, Ages 1-21.” Alyssa Royse, Joanna Schroeder, Julie Gillis, and Jamie Utt start with appropriate lessons for preschoolers, such as “Never force a child to hug, touch or kiss anybody, for any reason.” They encourage parents to teach school-age children to check in with their friends once in a while during imaginative play (such as war games), to make sure everyone is still having fun.

In the section on teens and young adults, the authors urge parents to “get kids talking” about how common “touch games” (such as butt-slapping) can make people feel violated, as well as “good touch” issues, like how to tell when someone is ready to kiss you. They give parents some scripts for responding to “locker-room talk” and helping kids plan to stay safe and keep others safe in a partying environment. Regardless of whether parents approve of drinking and recreational drug use, most teenagers will end up in that setting sooner or later.

– How will you know whether it’s okay to kiss someone, touch someone, or have sex with someone when you’ve had a lot to drink? Explain that decisions sometimes become cloudy, and signals become unclear when we are impaired. How will you be sure that you are reading the other person’s signals accurately? Suggest that they always ask for permission to touch or kiss another person, especially when there’s drinking involved.

– Although it should be obvious, explain that a person who is drunk, high or otherwise impaired should not be touched, harassed or sexually assaulted. Teach your children to stand up for, and seek help for, a fellow partygoer who has had to much too drink.

– Be careful about the language you use with your kids about partying. The responsibility is never on the victim to have prevented his or her assault. It is always on the perpetrator to make the right decision and not harm anyone.

Please share any relevant advice or resources in this thread.

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Fourth Way

    I recommend MISSOULA, the new book about rape in a town obsessed with college football.  But seeing the attitude of the new county prosecutor there which is revealed in the book, the football part is mostly irrelevant.  

    There are several rape stories in the book.  They don’t have satisfying endings.  All college bound women should be assigned this book for their summer orientation reading.

    • I have read several reviews

      of that book, but not the piece itself. The link about the frat boy comes from Nicholas Kristof’s column about the book. Talk about disturbing:

      One of the most chilling sections of [Jon] Krakauer’s book quotes a fraternity brother, “Frank,” describing his technique to a researcher, David Lisak:

      “We’d be on the lookout for the good-looking girls, especially the freshmen, the really young ones. They were the easiest. … Then we’d get them drinking right away. … They’d be guzzling it, you know, because they were freshmen, kind of nervous.”

      “Frank” recounted how he targeted one young woman, plied her with alcohol-spiked punch, and then led her to a bed. “At some point, she started saying things like … ‘I don’t want to do this right away,’ or something like that. I just kept working on her clothes … and she started squirming. But that actually helped, because her blouse came off easier. … She tried to push me off, so I pushed her back down. … I mean, she was so plastered that she probably didn’t know what was going on, anyway. I don’t know, maybe that’s why she started pushing on me. But, you know, I just kept leaning on her, pulling off her clothes.”

      “Frank” said he kept his arm across her chest, by the base of her neck, to reduce her squirming as he had sex with her. When he was finished, he dressed and returned to the party.

      And the woman? “She left.”

      • The frat story is indeed disturbing, but

        most of what I have seen of the “Affirmative Consent” movement insists that only men can request consent, and only women can provide consent.  Further, “Consent is to be determined from the perspective of the complainant.” meaning that 100% of the burden of proof is on the accused, not the accuser; ‘presumption of innoncence’ turned completely on its head.

        While the story of the frat boy is truly disgusting, appalling, and should be condemned, the movement has begun to progress to the point where even two previously consenting individuals, under no influence of alcohol or other drugs (other than perhaps dopamine) can still be considered as having had non-consensual sex because there was no “clear, unambiguous verbal ‘yes'”, just some flirting and touching in bed on a rainy morning that led where that sort of thing sometimes tends to lead between a romantically engaged couple.

        The “affirmative consent” movement seems like it’s becoming the “zero tolerance” movement from schools, where kids can get tossed out on their ear for eating their pop-tart into the shape of a gun.

        There was a time when this sort of thing would have been a parody, but now it’s real.  Honestly, how can that HELP such a movement, when the association with such things invites quite a bit of ridicule.

        Dating seems to be about navigating an ever-increasing legal minefield to even feel comfortable spending time with the opposite sex.  And, frankly, as a single male, movements like this in today’s society are beginning scare the hell out of me.  On a date, the woman may be thinking, “does he like me, will he finally kiss me?”, while the man is thinking, “if I don’t get her consent to kiss her, will I end up in the back seat of a police car?”  First kisses and other “firsts” in a relationship are supposed to be about siezing the moment and reading the signals as to when the moment is right, not about wondering how many hours, days, or years one might spend in jail for leaning in too soon.

        • show me one example

          of anyone, anywhere in this country who has been jailed for kissing someone. No one is being locked up over a first kiss gone wrong. If she’s not interested, you back off. End of story.

          As I wrote in the post, men as well as women can be violated without their consent. I never said parents should teach their kids the frame that boys/men are always the perpetrators. Nor do any of the materials I linked above.

          • do I get to

            cite any southern states pre-1970? And while those instances may have been racially motivated, they meet the criteria of “anyone, anywhere in this country who has been jailed for kissing someone.”

            Okay maybe that’s not fair.  I’m not attempting to diminish the struggles of women or excuse the actions of obvious (or even slightly-less-obvious-but-still-rather-obvious) inappropriate sexual contact, even if ‘inappropriate sexual contact’ includes ‘kissing’ in many jurisdictions.

            I’m also not saying that only women can be assaulted; frankly, males AND females should be scared of the implications of this trend as it applies to dating.  But, let’s be honest, males should be MORE afraid, as male-on-female and male-on-male assault is more prevalent than female-on-male or female-on-female assault.

            From Ontario, Canada (which, yes, is not the USA, but IS a close enough neighbor that their attitudes closely mirror our own and vice-versa):  http://www.sascwr.org/files/ww…

            It includes ‘warning’ that an offender may use the “honest and mistaken belief in consent” defense in a criminal case.  This then leads to what has turned into most “affirmative consent” policies, which REQUIRE consent, in a verbal yes, in order to proceed.

            To wit, from the ‘Teens and Young Adults’ section of the “Healthy Sex Talk” link that you provided (you quoted #7, Partying, this is #3 in that same section. Emphasis mine):

            This is a great time to explain enthusiastic consent. About asking permission to kiss or touch a partner.

            Explain that only “yes” means “yes”.
            Don’t wait for your partner to say “no” to look for consent.

            I fully acknowledge that my “kissing” scenario was intended as reductio ad absurdum, which is why I used it.  However, I AM pointing out that “consent forms” do actually exist, they exist unironically, and that the “affirmative consent” movement is heading in that direction.

            Did any Gen-X’er or Boomer back in the 80’s or 90’s seriously think that by 2015, we would have schools suspending and/or expelling students from school for the act of eating a pastry into the shape of a handgun?  The “zero tolerance” movement as applied to “weapons” in schools is instructive as to the lengths that some groups will go to “feel safe”, and my fear (which I’m quite honest about, actually) is that some day my kissing example will be part of an actual headline or news story.

            Because, let’s face it, the loudest voices tend to get the most play in the press, and politicians tend to cater to those individuals, for better or worse.  If the loudest voices are the “affirmative consent” crowd, the “only a verbal ‘yes’ means ‘yes'” groups, and the “over 50% of women have been assaulted in their lives” crowd, that’s where all of this is headed some day.

            I think my biggest internal struggle with all of this is that I’m apalled that we as a society seem to be getting to a point of “distrust others by default” rather than “trust others by default”, as can be seen in most laws that get written nowadays.

  • Not

    Not discrediting any rape, just the feminism. Why don’t they talk about the 38% of men raped or sexually assualted?

    http://www.slate.com/articles/…

    • whom are you accusing

      of not talking about sexual assaults against men and boys? The guide posted on the Everyday Feminism site is not gender-specific. It talks about respecting the bodily integrity and autonomy of boys as well as girls, as a way of protecting children against assault.

      Both of the other resources I linked above make clear that men can also be violated without their consent.

Comments