[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog for Democrats and progressives in the state of Iowa. Join up, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, and help build up current majorities and keep our leadership honest.
Authors
- desmoinesdem
- Mark Langgin
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (pt. 1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (pt. 2)
- National politics in 2009 (pt. 1)
- National politics in 2009 (pt. 2)
- Add this blog to your list of Technorati favorites
Twitter Updates
    - follow desmoinesdem on Twitter
    Search




    Advanced Search


    Paid Advertising


    Mobile Blog Reader - powered by Notice Orange
    Bleeding Heartland
    It's what plants crave.

    Branstad no longer ruling out governor's race

    by: desmoinesdem

    Sun Aug 02, 2009 at 11:56:17 AM CDT


    Less than three months after saying he would not run against Governor Chet Culver next year, former governor Terry Branstad now tells the Des Moines Register he is "not ruling it out." Moreover,

    Branstad is accepting invitations to meet with party activists. Two weeks ago, he met with about 50 political and business leaders at the Alden home of Bruce Rastetter, an influential Republican fundraiser and ethanol industry executive.

    New calls for Branstad's candidacy, and encouraging words from key donors such as West Des Moines developer Gary Kirke, underscore a growing feeling in his party that Democrat Gov. Chet Culver is vulnerable as he finishes his first term and that the emerging GOP field lacks a contender who can beat him.

    A Branstad candidacy would force some of the lesser-known Republicans from the race, but the GOP field will not clear for him. Bob Vander Plaats will stay in, and he plays to the social conservative constituency that saved Branstad's bacon in his tough 1994 primary against Congressman Fred Grandy.

    I think there would be a niche for a third candidate who might emphasize Vander Plaats' poor general election prospects and Branstad's record of fiscal mismanagement as governor.

    Many Iowa Republicans deeply distrust Doug Gross, the 2002 gubernatorial nominee who was a top aide to Branstad and has been shopping for a candidate to support all year. The March opinion poll Gross commissioned on behalf of the Iowa First Foundation sparked the Branstad for governor rumors.

    Bruce Rastetter and Gary Kirke, who are fueling the Branstad recruitment efforts, are big Republican players but not without controversy in GOP circles either. Rastetter gave a lot of money to Republican candidates in 2008 and may have been involved in a group running ads against Culver. But he also gave Culver's campaign committee $25,000 in 2007, as did Kirke. Rastetter gave the maximum allowable contribution to Rudy Giuliani's presidential campaign, and we all remember how highly Iowa Republicans thought of Rudy.

    I do not think that rank and file Republicans are going to sit back and let these kingmakers choose Branstad as their candidate against Culver. Then again, I still think Branstad is not going to run for governor, so I could be proven wrong.

    In other news on the GOP race for governor, Jason Hancock wrote a good piece for Iowa Independent on the pros and cons of a competitive Republican primary. I tend to agree with Republicans who think a tough primary will help the GOP by generating media buzz and starting to close the voter registration gap with Iowa Democrats. On the other hand, there's a chance that harsh infighting could damage the eventual nominee. The most disastrous outcome for Republicans is still John Deeth's dream of Vander Plaats winning the nomination at a state convention. A Branstad candidacy would eliminate that possibility.

    Share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

    LATE UPDATE: National Republicans are heavily recruiting Branstad, and the Washington Post's Chris Cillizza says one of them told him Branstad is "very" close to getting in the race. The prospect of national money coming to this race has to be appealing to Iowa Republicans.

    I am enjoying the comment threads on Branstad at The Iowa Republican blog, like this one.  

    desmoinesdem :: Branstad no longer ruling out governor's race
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    why not? (0.00 / 0)
    I do not think that rank and file Republicans are going to sit back and let these kingmakers choose Branstad as their candidate against Culver.

    He's a known quantity, who apparently is still pretty popular with Republicans. It's not like kingmakers are foisting an unknown on the rank and file.

    The primary then becomes a race for the LG spot, don't you think? Rants/Fong will emphasize youth, and Fong in particular, attracting new voters. BVP will rep for one-issue voters, but I think various forces will come together to ensure that the era of the Pat Robertson evangelical wing is over, precisely because he is "the most disastrous outcome." Also, he had his chance as Nussle's LG pick. Why stick someone on the ticket who is guaranteed to turn off a significant segment of the electorate in the GE?

    I think the 'wait and see' stuff is all about monitoring the national environment. Let's be honest, right now, the fed stimulus isn't getting good PR, and Culver doubled-down on this approach. I know you're going to say that the money will start streaming in 2010, and that's all well and good, but the bar is getting higher because opinions tend to harden. IOW, people are going to have to see real improvement, both in the economy and visually (project success). I think Culver made the right decision for IA, but I also think that he is now tethered to the perceived success/failure of the national effort, which is TBD.


    I think social conservatives (0.00 / 0)
    have long felt used by power-brokers in the Des Moines business community. A large number will resist nominating Branstad. It might not be enough to deny him the nomination but it will be enough to keep him from coasting. There's also the fact that he appointed two of the current Supreme Court judges, including the author of Varnum v Brien, and he hasn't slammed the court for that ruling.

    I would expect a significant number of Republicans to prefer a more forward-oriented campaign than, "We're out of ideas, so we bring you the guy we elected in the 1980s."

    I agree with you that Culver's prospects decline if the economy is still in a recession next year, or is heading into a double-dip after a very weak recovery. I still wouldn't put him on the list of highly endangered governors, though.  

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


    [ Parent ]
    it seems to me (0.00 / 0)
    It might not be enough to deny him the nomination but it will be enough to keep him from coasting.

    that the smart bet would be to add one of the others (Rants/Fong) and present a ticket early on. That could be another reason for 'wait and see' -- who is the best bet to bring another +10, leaving BVP in the dust?

    I would expect a significant number of Republicans to prefer a more forward-oriented campaign than, "We're out of ideas, so we bring you the guy we elected in the 1980s."

    Depends. The pendulum may be swinging back to 'experience, please.' This is bad news for a Fong type but presents an opening for the GOP w/ their own Good Sherpa.

    A BVP win means no jobs/contacts in DC for GOP operatives, movers and shakers, as everyone will discount IA's importance in 2012. Saying that social conservatives won't stand for anything other than their own hand-picked selection is like saying liberals will stay home if a centrist-type is nominated. The parties have 101 ways of yanking chains and pulling the rugs out.


    [ Parent ]
    Gubernatorial matchmaking (4.00 / 1)
    If Branstad jumps in, it won't clear the field, but it will make it a two man race. And it won't be a Jack Johnson vs. John Jackson kind of race. It will be deeply ideological and profoundly ugly. The race will be between the right-wing idealists who see in BVP an ideologically pure candidate, and the center-right pragmatists who see in Branstad a lukewarm candidate who can win.

    The other thing that a Branstad candidacy would do is, as ragbrai hit on, spark a running-mate arms race. Rants' 10-15% bump makes him a very attractive pickup for either candidate, but he's not a nice bedfellow. Fong's youth and ethnicity would compliment Branstad the Grey very well. McKinley's level-headed Sancho Panza-esque pragmatism would compliment Bob Quixote very well.

    I'm not sure I see much of a way forward for either Roberts or Behn.  


    [ Parent ]
    it's telling (4.00 / 1)
    that while Republicans have been crowing all year about how "vulnerable" Culver is, now many of them are pleading with Terry Branstad to get in this race. If they honestly thought that the generic Republican could beat Culver once he got some name recognition, none of this "draft Branstad" stuff would be happening.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

    [ Parent ]
    16 point juggernaut (4.00 / 2)
    If we had a candidate who had a 16 point advantage on a sitting Republican, we'd move heaven and earth to get him/her into the race. Can't blame Republicans for doing the same.

    From a party perspective, the best thing they could do is to nominate Branstad, win, and use the office to build up their bench. How many people have we got out there now who were ex-Vilsack guys?

    Chris Cilliza today says Branstad is close to jumping in.

    http://voices.washingtonpost.c...


    [ Parent ]
    if they think they can't win (0.00 / 0)
    without Branstad, then it makes perfect sense for them to go all out for him. But if they thought a newer candidate could win, they would be better off running with that person in terms of party-building.

    I am interested to see how the social conservatives react if Branstad decides to run. There will be a lot of pressure on them to sit down, shut up and get behind him (in order to get RNC to commit to spending money on this race). Many of the social conservatives supported Branstad back in the day. However, he didn't deliver a lot on their issues when he was governor--even after they saved him from losing to Grandy, even when he had a Republican legislature to work with. I wonder how it all would play out in a Branstad/Vander Plaats primary.

    Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


    [ Parent ]
    I dont think he will (0.00 / 0)
    But it is obvious he is not happy with his job at DMU, or is it UDM? Maybe he is eyeing a return to politics and using this as a way to judge his popularity? Anyway you slice it, the Republican Party of the 80's and 90's are not the same as they are today

    Bring Out Your Dead!!! (4.00 / 1)
    (Thump)

    "For every political action, there is an equal but opposite satiric reaction." Political Fallout: http://www.political-fallout.blogspot.com/

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    Iowa Liberal Blogs
    - Ames Progressive
    - Blog For Iowa
    - Common Iowan
    - Iowa Independent
    - IowaDemocrat
    - Iowa Guy
    - Iowa Liberal
    - Iowa Progress
    - John Deeth
    - Lefty Blogs Iowa
    - Political Fallout
    - Popular Progressive
    Iowa Conservative Blogs
    - Hawkeye Review
    - Hawkeye GOP
    - Iowa Defense Alliance
    - Questions, Comments & Insults
    - The Bean Walker
    - The Iowa Republican
    - The Real Sporer
    Iowa Hybrid Political Blogs
    - Essential Estrogen
    - God, Politics and Rock 'n' Roll
    Political Journalists' Blogs
    - 24-Hour Dorman (Todd Dorman)
    - Covering Iowa Politics (Cedar Rapids Gazette/Lee Enterprises staff)
    - Iowa Insider (Charlotte Eby)
    - Iowa Political Alert (Douglas Burns)
    - IowaPolitics.com (Lynn Campbell)
    - Iowa Politics Insider (Des Moines Register staff)
    - On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
    - Politically Speaking (Bret Hayworth)
    - Price of Politics, etc. (Dave Price)
    - Radio Iowa blog (O.Kay Henderson)
    Iowa Democrats
    - Chet Culver (Governor)
    - Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
    - Bruce Braley (IA-01)
    - Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
    - Leonard Boswell (IA-03)
    - Iowa Democratic Party
    - Iowa House Democrats
    - Iowa Senate Democrats
    - Iowa 4th District Democrats
    - Iowa 5th District Democrats
    - Francis Thicke for Secretary of Agriculture
    - Roxanne Conlin for U.S. Senate
    - Tom Fiegen for U.S. Senate
    - Bob Krause for U.S. Senate
    - Bill Maske for Congress (IA-04)
    - Matt Campbell for Congress (IA-05)
    - Mike Denklau for Congress (IA-05)
    County Democrats
    - County chairs list at IDP site
    - Iowa 4th District Democrats (includes contact info for county chairs)
    - Iowa 5th District Democrats (includes contact info for county officers)
    - Allamakee County Democrats
    - Appanoose County Democrats
    - Black Hawk County Democrats
    - Boone County Democrats
    - Bremer County Democrats
    - Buena Vista County Democrats
    - Carroll County Democrats
    - Cedar County Democrats
    - Clinton County Democrats
    - Dubuque County Democrats
    - Emmet County Democrats
    - Fayette County Democrats
    - Hardin County Democrats
    - Harrison County Democrats
    - Henry County Democrats
    - Jackson County Democrats
    - Jefferson County Democrats
    - Johnson County Democrats
    - Linn County Democrats
    - Marion County Democrats
    - Monona County Democrats
    - Muscatine County Democrats
    - Page County Democrats
    - Pocahontas County Democrats
    - Polk County Democrats
    - Scott County Democrats
    - Story County Democrats
    - Tama County Democrats
    - Wapello County Democrats
    - Warren County Democrats
    - Washington County Democrats
    - Woodbury County Democrats
    Statistics




     
    Powered by: SoapBlox