[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
- desmoinesdem
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2015
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 12
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99

Advanced Search

Paid Advertising

Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Vilsack caught up in beltway scandal du jour (updated)

by: desmoinesdem

Wed Jul 21, 2010 at 10:16:02 AM CDT

Rarely are secretaries of agriculture near the center of attention in Washington, but Tom Vilsack is in the hot seat after abetting the right-wing noise machine's latest attempt to undermine the Obama administration. On Monday an African-American US Department of Agriculture official, Shirley Sherrod, was sacked because a right-wing website made her appear to have discriminated against a white farmer.

Sherrod, USDA's rural development director for Georgia, said she was ordered to resign on Monday after a video, posted on one of Andrew Breitbart's conservative sites, showed her saying she had not given a white farmer her "full force."

The NAACP later posted the full, unedited video of Sherrod speaking at an NAACP Freedom Fund Dinner, and it showed the remarks had been taken out of context in the version posted by Breitbart. Breitbart had said that he had posted the full version he was given. The farmer, Roger Spooner, now 87, appeared on CNN from his Georgia home and said Sherrod had been "helpful in every way - she saved our farm."

Vilsack should know better than to validate a phony right-wing narrative, but he's never been a happy partisan warrior. I'm not surprised he kicked a USDA official to the curb instead of waiting to hear all the facts. He probably hoped to kill this "news" story before it gained momentum. The problem is, he has created more incentive for Obama's opponents to gin up fake scandals. Vilsack also damaged his own reputation. Lots of people will want answers to the questions Greg Sargent asks today:

Now that the full Shirley Sherrod video has been released, vindicating her completely, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack is  promising to undertake a review of her firing. So maybe he will re-instate her after all.

But it isn't enough for Vilsack to reinstate her. People should demand that his review include an explanation for his own decision to fire her. We need to hear his justification for the decision to ax this woman before all the facts were in, on the strength of nothing more than an Andrew Breitbart smear.

Did Vilsack make any effort to learn more about her speech before giving her the push? If not, why not? Sherrod says she told top USDA officials that the full speech would vindicate her. Did anyone at USDA give her protestations even a passing listen? Did anyone try to obtain video of the full speech? If not, why not? Why was Breitbart's word alone allowed to drive such a high-profile decision?

People should also demand that the White House weigh in publicly on what happened here. The White House has only discussed this via anonymous leaks, and this morning, officials are conveniently leaking word that the White House prodded Vilsack to reconsider Sherrod's firing. That's nice, but was the White House told in advance that the firing was about to happen, and if so, why did it allow the firing to proceed?

The White House looks bad for supporting Vilsack's rush to judgment, then backing off when the full video of Sherrod's remarks appeared. But ultimately, this was Vilsack's mistake. Let's hope he learned the right lessons from it.

UPDATE: Charles Lemos posted the full video of Sherrod's speech and his reaction to it. It's worth a read.

SECOND UPDATE: Vilsack has apologized and offered Sherrod another USDA position. I've posted the video after the jump. Good for him; it's not always easy for politicians to admit a mistake. TPMDC reported today,

In response to a question from TPMDC, Vilsack called the debacle "a teachable moment for me." He admitted that Sherrod had received advance notice of Breitbart's intention to (mis)use the clip and had attempted to inform her superiors, including Vilsack, by email -- but the email did not get through, and thus her superiors' first contact with her regarding the incident was after Breitbart's release of the clip.
desmoinesdem :: Vilsack caught up in beltway scandal du jour (updated)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Congratulations... (0.00 / 0)
...Ex-Gov Tom, you just aided and abetted the breitbarting of yet another minority government official.  When is this side of the aisle going to learn to vet sources and respond appropriately?

We're scared to death (3.00 / 1)
FoxNews gets the biggest ratings in the country by a wide margin on a nightly basis.  If Glenn Beck said on his show Gary Locke had ab affair with the wife of a left-wing dictator while he was on a trade mission Beck would just be able to say it without any proof and he would have millions calling for Locke's head.

Facts are not important to these folks, blood and theater is.  Vilsack was just covering his tracks or else the goons would have had his job to.  I guarantee if Vilsack is ever in a tough race against people will use this "scandal" against him.  

what on earth is that? (0.00 / 0)
Here is my favorite part:

Read these nine simple principles.  If you believe in seven of them, we have something in common.  Welcome.

What if I only believe in 6?

[ Parent ]
then you'd be (0.00 / 0)
hmmm, let's see, I make that six-sevenths of the way toward having something in common with them...

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Makes sense (0.00 / 0)
But which two don't they believe in?

[ Parent ]
I read it (0.00 / 0)
like the RNC's ill-fated "purity test" (candidates had to have the "right" position on at least 8 out of 10 issues). But they could have used a copy editor, because I see why you read it to mean they only believe in seven out of their own nine principles.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Note to Grassley, King, and Vilsack (0.00 / 0)
Please engage brain before opening mouth.

surprisingly (0.00 / 0)
King claims that he plans every controversial thing he says in advance, according to Bret Hayworth:

King once said in a Sioux City meeting I covered that he never says anything without thinking it out. He told the Downtown Rotary Club members that day that his words are weighed ahead of time, never off the cuff and designed to stir discussion of key issues.

He doesn't lack a brain filter--he's a provocateur.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Vilsack's apology video is online (0.00 / 0)
Here's the link:

He seems very sincere and regretful about this incident, and it sounds like he has offered her a high-level post if she wants to return.

I have always thought that Vilsack was a level-headed guy, even if he wasn't as liberal as I wanted him to be.  So I was surprised that he panicked so quickly on this incident.  

Good, straight-forward apology (0.00 / 0)
by Vilsack.  So rare you hear such an honest admission of having made a mistake.  This episode is certainly a teachable moment for many.  But more than anything else, I think this whole thing reflects how the 24/7 news cycle and rapid fire attacks and responses have changed politics.

[ Parent ]

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Blog For Iowa
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowa Starting Line
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats

Powered by: SoapBlox