[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (2)
- National politics in 2009 (1)
- National politics in 2009 (2)
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2012
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2012
- Add this blog to your list of Technorati favorites
2012 Election Previews
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Senate district 14
- Senate district 18 (2011)
- Senate district 22
- Senate district 26
- Senate district 28
- Senate district 32
- Senate district 36
- Senate district 38
- Senate district 40
- Senate district 46
- Senate district 48
- Senate district 49
- House district 14
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 40
- House district 43
- House district 46
- House district 48
- House district 55
- House district 56
- House district 57
- House district 58
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 64
- House district 66
- House district 68
- House district 76
- House district 80
- House district 88
- House district 91
- House district 92
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Mobile Blog Reader - powered by Notice Orange
Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Do Female Candidates Need a "Hook?"

by: Kelly

Thu Jan 05, 2012 at 19:25:05 PM CST


I was reading this post suggesting that the treatment of Michelle Bachmann will make it less appealing for women to run for office. I initially bristled at the idea that it she was somehow mistreated by the press and the public. After all, I mean she held views that should have immediately made her inviable for the post. Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann may not have deserved to be treated as serious candidates, but as the author points out neither does Santorum (or Gingrich for that matter). Santorum is easily as wacky as Bachmann, and I think probably a less genuine person. Regardless of whether Bachmann was mistreated (and I think the author is persuasive that she was), I don't think there is any question that it would be harder for a female to seek office. So what is it going to take to get a serious run out of a female presidential candidate?

I fear that the reason that Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann might get worse treatment is that a successful female candidate is going to need a "hook." Even worse it seems like the hooks are going to have to be extremity. The thinking seems to be: If I wanted a middle of the road candidate with mainstream views, there are plenty of boring men I can vote for. If you want my attention as a female, you're going to have to be out in the weeds somewhere. The implication is of course that by default we'd rather vote for a man and you're going to need something special to move us from that position.

As an aside, I do subscribe to the notion that Santorum's lack of qualifications as a candidate played to his advantage in Iowa. He was so bad that he didn't get the spotlight until it was too late for the public to realize how unappealing of a candidate he was. Those desperate to vote for someone who wasn't Romney jumped on the bus without checking it out too closely. In a week they may very well regret that decision, but for the moment they just wanted to vote for someone who wasn't Romney.

We can only hope that a viable female candidate will get her due in a manner similar to Barack Obama --Charisma and gravitas. I only hope that she uses it a little more judiciously if she gets there.

Kelly :: Do Female Candidates Need a "Hook?"
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

I'm sorry, but (0.00 / 0)
I fear that the reason that Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann might get worse treatment is that a successful female candidate is going to need a "hook." Even worse it seems like the hooks are going to have to be extremity. The thinking seems to be: If I wanted a middle of the road candidate with mainstream views, there are plenty of boring men I can vote for. If you want my attention as a female, you're going to have to be out in the weeds somewhere.

I don't understand what you're trying to say or what this is based on.


Simply suggesting (0.00 / 0)
Simply suggesting that for a typical voter their default position is going to be that they should vote for a male.  You may need something "more" as a female.

[ Parent ]
but why would the "more" (0.00 / 0)
tend to be extremism? In Iowa's Senate district 18 special election, the "more" for Liz Mathis was very high name recognition and favorable impressions based on her career in broadcasting.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
I take the opposite view, (4.00 / 1)
There isn't much data. We've had three women candidates for president: Shirley Chisholm in 1972, Hillary Clinton and Michele Bachmann. I consider them all to have been serious candidates. Sarah Palin did not run an independent campaign for president or even for vice-president.

Sure, in 2008, numerous polls indicated that a significant, but not insurmountable, nr of Americans were uncomfortable w/ voting for a woman. However, I would say the trend today is that all candidates, male or female, indulge in a "hook," or some gimmick to stand out in the crowd. I think pointing out that Santorum, Gingrich, Paul, Perry etc were just as extreme supports this. Here in IA, it was a manifestation of trying to appeal to a significant voting bloc -- social conservatives.

I take the opposite view. It's not hard to conclude that accessing the socon bloc means engagement with a large number of gatekeepers, from organizations like Family Leader to pastor networks. One area where Bachmann tripped up was in assuming that she had equal access and opportunity here.

My point in comments to the original diary was that non-traditional candidates should not expect to enjoy benefits from institutions established to assist status quo interests. Obama realized this right away and instead appealed to constituencies unassociated with gatekeepers.

Shirley Chisholm's "hook" was "unbought and unbossed." This was actually a Bachmann's strength, IMO. She also "presents" well, especially to suburbanites. Time and time again I would read how people simply liked her after a brief encounter. Pandering to socons did nothing for her.

I think a more successful path may have been to dial back the extremism and target suburban voters; appeal to youth voters who do not in general have issues with non-traditional candidates; and just pick up a slice of the socon vote instead of trying to maximize it. Out of the gate, she'd have picked up a larger share of socons than Romney would.

The bottom line is that no, I would not advocate for a gimmick, and particularly not extremism. I think women candidates should be realistic about the terrain and properly identify advantages and disadvantages. Sometimes you make your own luck. Compelling positions and hard work still rule the day.


[ Parent ]
Shirley Chisholm (4.00 / 1)
= awesome.

Agree, Bachmann should have done more to present herself as unafraid to challenge even her own party's leaders. She did this to some extent by emphasizing her uncompromising fights against Obamacare, etc., but she could have done more.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
no doubt (0.00 / 0)
the "name five people you admire" type questions are trite, but Shirley Chisholm would be in my top 5.

Kweisi Mfume ran an "unbought and unbossed" campaign for real in 2006, which is why I volunteered for his campaign. I still can't get over the loss. It was very close.

I suppose Margaret Chase Smith should be included in a list of women presidential candidates, but she didn't campaign, so no.


[ Parent ]
a large proportion of women (0.00 / 0)
who have served in Congress started out as political spouses or were born into dynasty families. That "hook" has launched many successful careers in politics for women.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Liberal
- John Deeth
- Lefty Blogs Iowa
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- Iowa Defense Alliance
- The Bean Walker
- The Iowa Republican
- The Real Sporer
Political Journalists' Blogs
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Eastern Iowa Government
- IowaPolitics.com
- Iowa Politics Insider
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Leonard Boswell (IA-03)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
- Iowa 4th District Democrats
- Iowa 5th District Democrats
County Democrats
- County chairs list at IDP site
- Iowa 4th District Democrats (includes contact info for county chairs)
- Iowa 5th District Democrats (includes contact info for county officers)
- Allamakee County Democrats
- Appanoose County Democrats
- Black Hawk County Democrats
- Boone County Democrats
- Bremer County Democrats
- Buena Vista County Democrats
- Carroll County Democrats
- Cedar County Democrats
- Clinton County Democrats
- Dubuque County Democrats
- Emmet County Democrats
- Fayette County Democrats
- Hardin County Democrats
- Harrison County Democrats
- Henry County Democrats
- Jackson County Democrats
- Jefferson County Democrats
- Johnson County Democrats
- Linn County Democrats
- Marion County Democrats
- Monona County Democrats
- Muscatine County Democrats
- Page County Democrats
- Pocahontas County Democrats
- Polk County Democrats
- Scott County Democrats
- Story County Democrats
- Tama County Democrats
- Wapello County Democrats
- Warren County Democrats
- Washington County Democrats
- Woodbury County Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox