[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa politics in 2008
- Iowa politics in 2009 (1)
- Iowa politics in 2009 (2)
- National politics in 2009 (1)
- National politics in 2009 (2)
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2013
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 25
- House district 28
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Iowa Senate Ethics Committee punts on Sorenson allegation

by: desmoinesdem

Thu Feb 14, 2013 at 10:00:07 AM CST


The Iowa Senate Ethics committee (unofficial slogan: "See no evil, hear no evil") met yesterday to consider an ethics complaint filed against Republican Senator Kent Sorenson. Five of the six committee members voted to table two serious allegations raised by Peter Waldron, who was a consultant for Michele Bachmann's presidential campaign while Sorenson was the campaign's Iowa chair in 2011.
desmoinesdem :: Iowa Senate Ethics Committee punts on Sorenson allegation
Bleeding Heartland discussed the background to Waldron's claims against Sorenson here. O.Kay Henderson covered yesterday's Senate Ethics Committee hearing for Radio Iowa, including partial audio from the proceedings. Both Mike Wiser and William Petroski also reported on the meeting. From Petroski's piece:

- Voted 4-2 to dismiss an allegation that Sorenson didn't file a disclosure statement regarding the nature of the business in which he was engaged. Greiner said Sorenson adequately provided information regarding his work as a consultant and there was no reason to proceed on the complaint. Seng voted no along with Sen. Dick Dearden, R-Des Moines. Those voting to dismiss included Greiner, Ethics Committee Chairman Wally Horn, D-Cedar Rapids, and Republican Sens. Jerry Behn of Boone and Jack Whitver of Ankeny

- Voted 5-1 to request further information on a complaint that Sorenson allegedly broke the law by taking a private home school list from former Iowa campaign staffer Barbara Heki's private computer in her office. A civil lawsuit is currently pending regarding the matter, and Greiner said it would be improper for legislators to insert themselves into legal proceedings.

- Voted 5-1 to request more information regarding an allegation that Sorenson allegedly concealed $7,500 a month in personal compensation to serve as Bachmann's Iowa campaign chairman.

All of the Ethics Committee members except for Democrat Joe Seng are willing to dismiss those other two charges unless Waldron comes up with more proof.

The other part of the complaint - also tabled today - alleges Sorenson was paid $7500 a month with money that originated in the Bachmann campaign fund, but was funnelled to a consulting firm that paid Sorenson to get around state senate rules which prohibit senators from getting paid to work on campaigns. Greiner and a majority of the committee said "unless and until" the Florida pastor supplies more information, the complaint ultimately will be dismissed.

"What we had in that packet was a bunch of fuzzy stuff and very few facts," Greiner said. "...He cites anonymous sources that are willing to go under oath. It's kind of difficult to put people under oath if they're anonymous. We need to know who these people are and we need facts before we can do anything."

Seng isn't my favorite Iowa Senate Democrat, but he was the only one on that committee making sense yesterday:

He said he favored having Iowa Supreme Court Justice Mark Cady appoint investigators to look into the complaints to determine if there was probable cause.

"This is a very serious allegation," Seng said. "I hate to make a decision as a legislator not having all the information....I think that this would be the best avenue to go."

Predictably, Sorenson declared victory, saying "I think it shows, and the committee agrees, that the allegations were baseless." Not at all:

"It wasn't a presumption of innocence or guilt," Seng said. "The (investigation) seemed a more, better alternative where a Supreme Court justice could give us a reason to see if there was a probable cause for this to go forward."

Waldron spoke to Radio Iowa's Henderson after the meeting.

As for providing the committee with more information about the allegation that Senator Sorenson was paid with money that came from the campaign, Waldron said Bachmann got other campaign employees to sign agreements the prevent them from revealing what they know.

"I did not sign the non-disclosure agreement," Waldron said. "My faith does not allow me to remain mute as a witness to a crime."
Waldron said he read Scripture and prayed this afternoon as the Ethics Committee met, and he's hoping other Bachmann campaign employees come forward to provide senators with the information the committee has decided it needs to proceed with an investigation of Sorenson.

"I'll leave it to God and their own conscience to take the risk," Waldron said. "I can't push them into a risk."

Sounds like Sorenson is going to skate this time. If I were a Republican, though, I'd be looking for a better candidate in Madison or Warren County to run for the Senate next year.  

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox