|
Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.
|
RNC
Sun Jan 27, 2013 at 07:10:00 AM CST
|
|
Busy weekend in Iowa politics! I'm continuing to update the post on Tom Harkin retiring with reactions and speculation about possible Senate candidates. Here's an open thread for anything else on your mind.
A bunch of links that caught my eye this week are after the jump.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1688 words in story)
|
|
Thu Aug 23, 2012 at 07:20:00 AM CDT
|
|
I've seen a lot of flimsy hooks for political fundraising, but nothing like the latest call for donations to the Republican Party of Iowa.
|
|
There's More...
:: (1
Comments, 785 words in story)
|
|
Thu May 24, 2012 at 14:09:46 PM CDT
|
|
Iowa's Republican National Committeewoman Kim Lehman announced today by e-mail that she will not seek another term on the RNC this summer.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 842 words in story)
|
|
Fri Apr 20, 2012 at 18:47:53 PM CDT
|
|
Iowa's three representatives on the Republican National Committee were denied entry to a reception with Mitt Romney today after they refused to sign a "delegate pledge form."
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 400 words in story)
|
|
Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 07:31:00 AM CST
|
Longtime Iowa political operative Gentry Collins has ended his bid to become chairman of the Republican National Committee, he told RNC members in a January 2 letter. Collins made the news in November by resigning as RNC political director and sending RNC members a devastating critique of current chairman Michael Steele's leadership. Dropping out of the race to succeed Steele, Collins wrote that
part of his mission in campaigning for chairman was to shed light on the party's financial condition, which he said, "has been a game-changer for Chairman Steele's re-election prospects." [...]
"I entered this race to make sure there was a credible alternative to Michael Steele and have said from day one I will not get in the way of electing new leadership at the RNC," Collins wrote.
Collins continued: "It is after much consideration and thought that I announce my withdrawal from the race for Chairman of the RNC. I believe that there are several qualified candidates in the race for Chairman, each of whom would do a fine job leading the committee through the 2012 Election cycle."
I figured Collins was a long-shot to take his former boss's job for various reasons. It didn't look good for him to establish a committee to support his bid for RNC chairman while he was still working at the committee. Craig Robinson's critique of Collins' "ego," "vengeful style" and "heavy-handed" tactics may have put off some Republican insiders too.
Various "whip counts" published by Washington-based journalists showed Collins with only three firm commitments from voting RNC members, far behind the front-runner, Wisconsin Republican Party chairman Reince Priebus. (That's pronounced "ryns pree-buhs.") Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn had publicly backed Collins, but committeeman Steve Scheffler was an early Priebus endorser. Iowa's committeewoman Kim Lehman is supporting Priebus too; she and Scheffler backed the main alternative to Steele in 2009.
Four previous leaders of the national GOP have been from Iowa. The most recent was pro-choice moderate Mary Louise Smith in the mid-1970s. Smith is still the only woman to have headed the RNC. Two women have entered the race to replace Steele, but a rule requiring the party chair and co-chair to be different genders puts them at a disadvantage.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Tue Dec 14, 2010 at 16:36:33 PM CST
|
|
Longtime Iowa political operative Gentry Collins officially announced yesterday that he will run for chairman of the Republican National Committee this January. Collins filed paperwork for the race last month shortly before he resigned as the RNC's political director. One of the three Iowa RNC members, state party chairman Matt Strawn, has already endorsed Collins.
However, RNC member Steve Scheffler told The Iowa Republican blog that he will back Wisconsin GOP chairman Reince Priebus for RNC chairman.
Not only is Scheffler supporting Priebus, but he has agreed to serve in Priebus' "kitchen cabinet." [...]
Preibus won Scheffler's support by being a strong defender of Iowa's first-in-the-nation status, having a strong stance on social issues, and pledging to run a tight ship if elected to lead the RNC.
Scheffler's support of Priebus is also a blow to Gentry Collins' bid to be RNC chairman. Collins, an Iowan, has spent years working in Iowa politics. His inability to secure the support of all three Iowa RNC members will likely be a red flag to other members of the committee.
Scheffler would have come into contact with Collins when Collins was running Mitt Romney's Iowa campaign in 2007. Scheffler heads the Iowa Christian Alliance, which organized house parties featuring Romney and several other Republican presidential candidates before the caucuses. (Neither Scheffler nor the Iowa Christian Alliance endorsed a candidate in that GOP field.) Scheffler was elected to represent Iowa at the RNC in July 2008, and Collins worked for John McCain's campaign in Iowa during that year's general election.
I haven't seen any public comment from Iowa's third RNC representative, Kim Lehman, regarding the upcoming race for chairman. She and Scheffler are ideologically similar, having been elected by the same faction of socially conservative delegates to the Iowa GOP state convention in 2008. In January 2009, Scheffler and Lehman publicly supported Katon Dawson for RNC chairman. He lost to current chairman Michael Steele on the sixth round of balloting.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 08:07:45 AM CST
|
|
Longtime Iowa GOP political operative Gentry Collins has formed a campaign organization to back his likely bid for Republican National Committee chairman this January. If elected, he would be the fifth leader of the national GOP from Iowa and the first since pro-choice moderate Mary Louise Smith chaired the RNC in the mid-1970s.
Collins' resignation letter as RNC political director probably buried Michael Steele's already faint hope of being re-elected for another two-year term as party leader. Several factors are likely to count against Collins when the 168 RNC members consider the possible successors to Steele, though.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 790 words in story)
|
|
Tue Nov 16, 2010 at 20:51:30 PM CST
|
|
Michael Steele's term as chairman of the Republican National Committee expires in January. Although staffing and fundraising problems have marked his tenure in the job, Steele hasn't ruled out seeking another two years in the position.
That won't happen if the departing RNC political director Gentry Collins has anything to say about it. Jonathan Martin got hold of the resignation letter Collins sent to Steele and the RNC's executive committee. Rarely have I heard of an employee denouncing the boss in such a devastating way. Excerpts and background on Collins are after the jump.
UPDATE: Scroll to the bottom for some reactions to Collins' letter.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1501 words in story)
|
|
Tue Aug 24, 2010 at 06:20:08 AM CDT
|
Iowa's Republican National Committeewoman Kim Lehman stood by her false assertion about President Barack Obama's faith yesterday. As Bleeding Heartland discussed here, Lehman claimed last week that Obama "personally told the muslims that he IS a muslim. Read his lips." Sam Stein of the Huffington Post asked Lehman to clarify and got this response:
"I was watching television when he was over there talking to the Muslim world and he made it, in my opinion, clear he was partially Muslim," Lehman told the Huffington Post. "The way he was approaching that speech was, 'Hey I'm one of you. I'm with you.' He didn't have to say that... but he did." [...]
"Again, going back to his speech... he would have said I'm a Christian and I'm from the Christian religion and we can work together. It didn't appear to me he said Christianity was part of his religion."
But oops! Stein looked up the transcript of Obama's June 2009 speech in Cairo and found this:
Now part of this conviction is rooted in my own experience. I'm a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims. As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and at the fall of dusk. As a young man, I worked in Chicago communities where many found dignity and peace in their Muslim faith.
The Des Moines Register's Jennifer Jacobs also sought comment from Lehman yesterday:
This morning, Lehman said she was referring to an Obama speech in Cairo last summer in which he reached out to Muslims "to seek a new beginning." In that speech, he makes no comment about being Muslim, a transcript shows.
Lehman said she objected to Obama's speech because "it just had a sense of embracing or aligning with the Muslims. I don't know. It was unnecessary the stuff he said. That's the whole point."
Lehman said she would never give anyone the impression that she is anything but a Christian.
"I don't give myself an appearance to the Muslims that I am aligning myself with the Muslims. I am strictly a Christian. I believe that. I stand by that. I'll die by that," she said.
Jason Hancock noted at Iowa Independent that this isn't the first time Lehman has used her twitter account to claim Obama is Muslim. According to Stein, though, she may be "the first [Republican] national committee member to fully endorse the Obama-is-a-Muslim view."
Lehman told Politico to read Obama's lips regarding his faith. She should take her own advice. She ignores the president's numerous public statements about being a Christian because in her opinion, one speech "had a sense of embracing or aligning with the Muslims." Republicans should be embarrassed to have one of their leaders pushing conspiracy theories, and it's a sad comment on the Iowa GOP that no one stepped up to counter Lehman's view.
Speaking of poor form, neither Stein nor Jacobs linked to this blog, which was the first to report on Lehman's comments about the president's faith.
UPDATE: The Iowa Democratic Party cited Lehman's comments in a fundraising e-mail, which you can read here. Todd Dorman posted a funny take on this episode too.
Krusty Konservative feels Lehman is "not helping the Republican cause."
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Sun Aug 22, 2010 at 07:39:04 AM CDT
|
|
You come across the strangest things on Twitter sometimes:
Yes, it's delusional to believe Politico is in the game to "protect" Barack Obama, but for now I'm more interested in Republican National Committeewoman Kim Lehman's claim that the president is Muslim. Presumably she was responding to Tim Grieve's August 19 report for Politico on the latest Pew survey about the president's religion. Pew found that about 18 percent of American adults say Obama is Muslim, while about 34 percent say Obama is Christian. About 34 percent of those who identified themselves as conservative Republicans told Pew Obama was Muslim. Grieve's report referred to "a dramatic spike in false views about the president's religious faith." Politico's Josh Gerstein also reported on the Pew finding, as well as a Time magazine survey which (using different wording) found even higher numbers of Republicans believe the president is Muslim.
Neither Lehman nor anyone else would claim Republican gubernatorial candidate Terry Branstad's not really a Christian because his mother was Jewish. Yet for some reason, it's not enough for Lehman that Obama has been baptized, regularly attended Christian churches for many years and was sworn in on a Christian bible.
I wonder how many other prominent Iowa Republicans believe the urban legend about Obama being Muslim. Representative Steve King recently claimed Obama is a "Marxist" who "surely understands the Muslim culture." What about Senator Chuck Grassley, Representative Tom Latham and Republican Congressional candidates Ben Lange, Mariannette Miller-Meeks and Brad Zaun?
State party chairman Matt Strawn and Steve Scheffler, head of the Iowa Christian Alliance, are Iowa's other two representatives on the RNC. Do they and members of the Iowa GOP's State Central Committee share Lehman's view?
Branstad's own interfaith family background makes him an ideal person to speak publicly about religion as a matter of faith and an individual's spiritual journey, as opposed to a genetic inheritance. But I'm not holding my breath for Branstad to dispel false rumors about Obama. He generally avoids taking any position that would anger conservatives--when he's not kowtowing to far-right sentiment, that is.
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Fri Aug 20, 2010 at 12:59:00 PM CDT
|
|
The Democratic National Committee voted today to keep the Iowa caucuses the first presidential nominating contest in 2012, according to Iowa Democratic Party Executive Director Norm Sterzenbach, who's attending the DNC meeting.
I'll update this post with more details as they become available. In July, the DNC Rules Committee approved the following calendar: Iowa caucuses on February 6, 2012; New Hampshire primary on February 14; Nevada caucuses on February 18; and South Carolina primary on February 28. All other Democratic nominating contests would occur in March or later. The Republican National Committee has adopted a calendar keeping Iowa first as well.
Any thoughts about the 2012 caucuses are welcome in this thread.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Mon Apr 26, 2010 at 16:23:08 PM CDT
|
A month after the House and Senate unanimously approved a bill restricting direct-mail pieces designed to look like census documents, the Republican National Committee is at it again:
An RNC mailer obtained by TPMmuckraker bears the words "Census Document" and, in all caps, "DO NOT DESTROY/OFFICIAL DOCUMENT," on the outside of the envelope. In smaller letters, it says: "This is not a U.S. government document." The new law requires, among other things, that such mailers state the name and address of the sender on the outside of the envelope -- something the RNC's missive doesn't appear to do. Inside, a letter from RNC chair Michael Steele, dated April 12, asks recipients to fill out a questionnaire about their political views, and solicits donations of as much as $500 or more. (See the mailer here.)
Last month, in response to virtually identical RNC mailers, members of both parties cried foul, raising the concern that the mailers could reduce the response rate for the actual Census -- which was mailed to Americans last month -- by confusing some voters. [...] Congress quickly passed a law -- the House vote was 416-0 -- requiring that mailers marked "census" state the name and address of the sender on the outside of the envelope, and contain an unambiguous disclaimer making clear that the mailer is not affiliated with the government.
Based on a PDF image, the mailer obtained by TPMmuckraker does not appear to state the sender's name and address on the outside. And the words "DO NOT DESTROY/OFFICIAL DOCUMENT" would appear to make the disclaimer that it's not a government document less than unambiguous.
The RNC's fundraising efforts have taken a hit this year, and Chairman Michael Steele is under pressure to turn things around, so I can't say I'm surprised by this desperate act.
On a related note, census mail-back rates exceeded expectations this year, which will save the U.S. Census Bureau hundreds of millions of dollars. Iowa's census participation rate is 77 percent so far, tied for third with Indiana and just behind Wisconsin and Minnesota. Many communities in Polk County have participation rates over 80 percent.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Mon Apr 05, 2010 at 20:09:53 PM CDT
|
Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele has been under pressure lately. Since he took over in January 2009, the RNC has spent far more than it has raised, and the latest numbers show the Democratic National Committee ahead of the RNC in cash of hand (which is highly unusual). Major Republican donors have been fleeing the RNC for various reasons, including staffers' embarrassing fundraising proposals and massive overspending on luxury hotels, limos and nightclubs. Today RNC Chief of Staff Ken McKay resigned, prompting one of Steele's advisers to leave in what Jonathan Martin described as "a full-scale bloodletting":
"Leadership requires that I can safely assure you, our donors, and the American people that our mission is what drives every dollar we spend, every phone call we make, every email we send and every event we organize," Steele wrote in the email [sent to RNC members and donors on Monday], obtained by POLITICO. "Recent events have called that assurance into question and the buck stops with me. That is why I have made this change in my management team and why I am confident about going forward to November with renewed focus and energy."
McKay didn't immediately respond to an email requesting comment.
But his apparent firing has roiled the close-knit world of GOP operatives and Monday night longtime Republican strategist and Steele adviser Curt Anderson said his consulting firm would no longer be working with the RNC.
"Ken McKay's departure is a huge loss for the Republican Party," Anderson said in a statement to POLITICO. "Ken steered the party through very successful elections last fall that have given us tremendous momentum. He's a great talent. Given our firm's commitments to campaigns all over the country we have concluded it is best for us to step away from our advisory role at the RNC. We have high personal regard for the Chairman and always have; we wish him well."
It's hard to see how the turmoil at the RNC won't end with Steele's departure, although Josh Marshall argued today that Steele
can't be fired, in significant measure, because he's black. Because canning Steele now would only drive home the reality that Republicans were trying to paper over, fairly clumsily, when they hired him in the first place. So Republicans are stuck with his myriad goofs and #pressfails and incompetent management and all the rest because of a set of circumstances entirely of their own making.
Hey, don't blame Iowa's RNC members; they voted for Katon Dawson over Steele in January 2009. But I must say I doubt a guy who became a Republican because the government desegregated his high school, and more recently belonged to an all-white country club, would have been the right man to rebuild the GOP's image.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
|
|
Thu Feb 11, 2010 at 10:20:14 AM CST
|
The Republican National Committee had its "worst election-year cash flow this decade" in 2009. RNC Chairman Michael Steele started the year with about $22 million cash on hand and ended the year with less than $9 million in the bank. Fortunately for him, the GOP may make up the lost ground with an innovative scam fundraising tool: fake census forms.
The fundraising letter comes in the form of a "survey," a frequently used device for partisan fundraising, but this one has a twist: Calling itself the "Congressional District Census," the letter comes in an envelope starkly printed with the words, "DO NOT DESTROY OFFICIAL DOCUMENT" and describes itself, on the outside of the envelope, as a "census document."
"Strengthening our party for the 2010 elections is going to take a massive grass-roots effort all across America," Steele writes in a letter that blends official-sounding language, partisan calls to arms, and requests for between $25 and $500. "That is why I have authorized a census to be conducted for every congressional district in the country."
Representative Dave Loebsack recently warned constituents in Iowa's second district about the RNC's appeal: "This fundraising letter even calls itself a 'Census survey' and asks people to pay for the cost of processing the census form." Iowa Independent posted a link to a scanned version of the mailing in this piece by Lynda Waddington. She notes, "The mailing includes a 'census tracking code' as well as a deadline to respond."
Representative Carolyn Maloney of New York introduced legislation this week to "prevent deceptive census lookalike mailings." Earlier, she and Representative William Clay of Missouri wrote the U.S. Postmaster General, charging the RNC was breaking federal law by sending out an "attempt to mislead recipients." Even if Maloney's bill moved forward, it would come too late to stop this fundraising drive.
Apparently the RNC's mailing is legal, according to the postal service, because "it doesn't use the full name of the U.S. Census Bureau or the seal of any government agency." But Ben Smith writes at Politico,
Even some who have been involved with the program, however, acknowledged that it walks the line.
"Of course, duping people is the point. ... That's one of the reasons why it works so well," said one Republican operative familiar with the program, who said it's among the RNC's most lucrative fundraising initiatives. "They will likely mail millions this year [with] incredible targeting."
Shameful.
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Sun Jan 31, 2010 at 11:15:16 AM CST
|
|
The Republican National Committee won't be imposing the "purity test" proposed by committeeman James Bopp of Indiana. During last week's meetings in Honolulu, a group of state GOP chairs unanimously voted against requiring Republican candidates to agree with at least eight out of ten conservative policy stands in order to receive RNC support during the 2010 campaign.
Bopp withdrew his motion from the floor on Friday after a compromise had been reached. RNC members then unanimously passed a non-binding resolution that "only 'urges' party leaders to support nominees who back the party's platform," Politico's Jonathan Martin reported.
Republican candidates for U.S. Senate in Illinois and Delaware would have failed Bopp's purity test and therefore not qualified for RNC support. The resolution that passed does not penalize candidates who disagree with various "core principles" of the GOP. Still, Bopp tried to spin the compromise as a victory:
"You've got to determine that the candidate supports all the core principles of the Republican Party before you support them," he said, explaining the alternate measure.
But when asked whether it was binding, Bopp was cut off by Oregon GOP Chairman Bob Tiernan, who was standing nearby the impromptu press briefing.
"That resolution passed is not binding; it's a suggestion," said Tiernan.
As Bopp began to again make his case for the compromise, Tiernan again interjected.
"There's nothing mandatory or required in there," the Oregonian noted.
"Can I answer the question, Mr. Chairman?" Bopp shot back.
Continuing, Bopp explained that he thought the RNC's decision to, for the first time, make it party policy to urge candidates to pledge fealty to the GOP platform represented a significant step.
But Tiernan, standing just over Bopp's shoulder, again rebutted his committee colleague.
"I'm not going to take that back and make my candidates sign it, that's ridiculous," Tiernan said, gesturing toward the compromise resolution in a reporter's hand. "We don't have a litmus test and we rejected the litmus test today."
As Bopp continued, Tiernan again spoke up.
"There's nothing binding in there," said the state chairman.
"Can I finish?" a plainly annoyed Bopp asked.
"Read the words," replied Tiernan.
"Shut up," Bopp finally said.
Although the RNC papered over this dispute, clearly tensions remain over whether Republican leaders should insist that candidates be conservatives.
Two of Iowa's RNC members, Steve Scheffler and Kim Lehman, supported Bopp's purity test. Our state's third representative on the RNC, Iowa GOP chairman Matt Strawn, didn't comment on Bopp's effort when it first emerged or last week, to my knowledge. I assume he agreed with other state party chairs, who according to various reports strongly opposed the idea. If that is inaccurate, I hope someone will correct me.
|
|
Discuss
:: (4
Comments)
|
|
Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 14:13:59 PM CST
|
|
Following up on my review of news from the first half of last year, I've posted links to Bleeding Heartland's coverage of Iowa politics from July through December 2009 after the jump.
Hot topics on this blog during the second half of the year included the governor's race, the special election in Iowa House district 90, candidates announcing plans to run for the state legislature next year, the growing number of Republicans ready to challenge Representative Leonard Boswell, state budget constraints, and a scandal involving the tax credit for film-making.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 5535 words in story)
|
|
Fri Jan 08, 2010 at 08:08:56 AM CST
|
|
I expected 2009 to be a relatively quiet year in Iowa politics, but was I ever wrong.
The governor's race heated up, state revenues melted down, key bills lived and died during the legislative session, and the Iowa Supreme Court's unanimous ruling in Varnum v Brien became one of this state's major events of the decade.
After the jump I've posted links to Bleeding Heartland's coverage of Iowa politics from January through June 2009. Any comments about the year that passed are welcome in this thread.
Although I wrote a lot of posts last year, there were many important stories I didn't manage to cover. I recommend reading Iowa Independent's compilation of "Iowa's most overlooked and under reported stories of 2009," as well as that blog's review of "stories that will continue to impact Iowa in 2010."
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 5197 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jan 07, 2010 at 14:56:38 PM CST
|
|
Following up on the diary I posted this morning, this post compiles links to Bleeding Heartland's coverage of national politics from July through December 2009. Health care reform was again the number one topic. I wish there had been a happy ending.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 3389 words in story)
|
|
Thu Jan 07, 2010 at 07:52:32 AM CST
|
|
It took me a week longer than I anticipated, but I finally finished compiling links to Bleeding Heartland's coverage from last year. This post and part 2, coming later today, include stories on national politics, mostly relating to Congress and Barack Obama's administration. Diaries reviewing Iowa politics in 2009 will come soon.
One thing struck me while compiling this post: on all of the House bills I covered here during 2009, Democrats Leonard Boswell, Bruce Braley and Dave Loebsack voted the same way. That was a big change from 2007 and 2008, when Blue Dog Boswell voted with Republicans and against the majority of the Democratic caucus on many key bills.
No federal policy issue inspired more posts last year than health care reform. Rereading my earlier, guardedly hopeful pieces was depressing in light of the mess the health care reform bill has become. I was never optimistic about getting a strong public health insurance option through Congress, but I thought we had a chance to pass a very good bill. If I had anticipated the magnitude of the Democratic sellout on so many aspects of reform in addition to the public option, I wouldn't have spent so many hours writing about this issue. I can't say I wasn't warned (and warned), though.
Links to stories from January through June 2009 are after the jump. Any thoughts about last year's political events are welcome in this thread.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 3702 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
|