I’m sitting in front of my TV trying to examine what the cable networks are saying about the debate. The first network showing coverage was Fox News and their pundits were generally annoying and conservative; essentially, they weren’t worth their time. But when they got to their focus group/panel of undecided caucus-goers done by Frank Luntz, they said that John Edwards won the debate.
I’m going to argue that John Edwards did indeed win the debate. He articulated a coherent message that blamed corruption, greed, and entrenched interests for the problems America faces. He also clearly told viewers that the only way to enact the policies and proposals that the candidates have promised is to elect a president that will unite America to stand up and fight back against these people. His criticisms were constant, his answers honest, and his leadership potential was clear. He told us how he is fighting for the middle class, and how he’s the candidate to truly enact change.
I’m always impressed with Obama’s rhetoric on the stump and during rallies, but I can’t seem to be impressed with his debating skills. Maybe I’m just missing something. And Hillary Clinton seemed like she was just there to give canned responses. But I do have to admit they were honest and presidential sounding. Joe Biden came to the debate with heart and passion, and even managed to keep his answers succinct. Chris Dodd was presidential and brought the experience necessary to lead. I was surprised how the speaking time was pretty equally divided, but amazed that Bill Richardson got the most time. His answers and policies were good, but he seemed like he just had a list of issues and was rattling them off.
All in all, however, I’d be proud to have any of these candidates to be my presidential nominee.
In my mind, the debate was timid enough to declare any candidate a winner for the right reasons. We want you to tell us who your winner was and why.Continue Reading...