I would have been disenfranchised by voter ID

Elise Bauernfeind lays out one of many scenarios that could lead to a citizen’s vote not counting after Republicans enact voter ID legislation. -promoted by desmoinesdem

As a journalism and politics major at Drake University, my right to vote is extremely important to me.

That’s why I am deeply concerned about Secretary of State Paul Pate’s voter ID proposal now in play in the Iowa Legislature. If it had been in place during the elections last November, my right to vote likely would have been blocked—even though I am an eligible Iowa voter.

Pate’s bill, both as filed and as amended by the House State Government Committee, would reduce the types of ID people would be allowed to use to verify their identity prior to voting to just Iowa driver’s licenses, passports or military/veterans IDs. And that change would make it much more difficult and complicated for thousands of people—including myself—to vote.

My situation was this: Last November was the first time that I was able to vote in a presidential election. Because I was already registered to vote in my home state of Minnesota, I applied for a Minnesota absentee ballot while physically at school in Des Moines. I received my ballot about a week before Election Day, and filled it out a couple of days later. But I messed up. I put in some of the information wrong, scribbled it out, and then was worried that the scribbles would make the ballot not count. So I never mailed it.

I asked one of my political science professors what I should do. She told me that since I’m an Iowa college student, I could vote in Iowa instead and register at the polls on Election Day, using my university-issued student ID or Minnesota driver’s license for ID. The process was simple and took less than five minutes.

It’s also effective. By Secretary Pate’s own admission, voter fraud in Iowa is almost non-existent. And the type of voter fraud in Iowa that Pate’s proposal would allegedly address—identity voter fraud, where a voter claims to be someone else; there hasn’t been one documented case.

However, if Pate’s proposed law had been in place, between the botched absentee ballot and my not already being an active, registered Iowa voter and not having an Iowa driver’s license, I likely would have been blocked from voting.

Under Pate’s law, I would have had to register almost two weeks ahead of time in order to get his suggested “free voter ID card” in time for the election. This would have been impossible, as I didn’t know that I would be voting in Iowa until two days before the election.

Under Pate’s proposed law, I might have been allowed to cast a provisional ballot, but it wouldn’t have been counted because I wouldn’t have been able (as required under Pate’s proposal) to then produce in less than 48 hours one of the acceptable forms of ID at my county auditor’s office.

This law is unnecessary, expensive, and attempts to fix a system that doesn’t need fixing. It’s especially a problem for students. Young people already have lower rates of voter participation than other age groups. The last thing we need is further discouragement from voting.

Elise Bauernfeind is a news journalism and politics major at Drake University. She is a Minnesota native who is interning at the ACLU of Iowa.

  • Back to the books

    The whole point of the bill is to discourage you, Elise. Legislators already know everything you have written.

  • Fact Check?

    Actually, this person just admitted to voter fraud. Her professor gave her bad advice. In order to legally vote in the state of Iowa, you have to be a resident ( https://sos.iowa.gov/elections/voterinformation/voterregistration.html ). “If the person is in the state primarily for educational purposes, that person will be considered a nonresident (https://registrar.uiowa.edu/residency)”. Also, the instructions for the Minnesota absentee ballot clearly describe what to do to make corrections. So, in fact, the very law that she is lamenting, would have actually done it’s intended purpose, and not have allowed her to illegally vote in Iowa. I, as a former Political Science and Journalism major at Drake University, am a bit disappointed that it took me all of five minutes to discover the facts, which she didn’t even bother to look up. 🙁

    • you are completely wrong

      The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the right of college students to vote where they are students in a landmark 1979 ruling.

      It has long been established that college students in Iowa who are from other states can vote in our elections.

      I haven’t voted in Minnesota but I know that Iowa’s absentee ballot instructions warn that the ballot will be considered spoiled if you cross out marks or make changes.

      You packed a remarkable number of factual errors into a short comment.

      • Sorry, but

        Having been proven so badly wrong in a short period of time, you have to mail your diploma back to Drake. It’s tough, but that’s the law (Take my word for it, I spent many years watching Judge Judy).

    • Thank you!

      It took you 5 minutes to look up? Good for you.

      How long did it take you to be an ill-informed asshole? Born that way? 🙂

Login or Join to comment and post.