If Grandma can Zoom, so can the government

Randy Evans: Too many government boards refuse to offer the virtual access that has become a part of everyday life for many Iowans.

In my day job, I wear the hat of the executive director of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council. This nonprofit, nonpartisan organization has been around for 40-plus years.

We advocate on behalf of the public and journalists for government transparency and accountability to the people of this state.

Periodically, I speak to groups of government employees and elected officials. One question that often comes up in those settings and in individual conversations with government leaders is some version of, “How are we doing?”

These days, this is what I tell them if they ask.

In the months after COVID-19 became public enemy number one in 2020, it was impressive how quickly local governments across Iowa and our state government scrambled to adapt. They found a way to hold their public meetings when the public was hesitant to venture into potentially large gatherings in small-ish spaces.

Officials swiftly began making their meetings available through live-streaming on Facebook or on videoconferencing platforms like Zoom. Meeting notices and meeting agendas told the public how they could watch without having to be in the room where the meetings originated.

But if anyone asks about my impressions now, I would tell them things have changed—and not always for the better.

Today, too many city councils, school boards, and county boards of supervisors have turned their backs on the technology that got them through the early months of the pandemic, before vaccines eased people’s anxieties about being in close proximity with large numbers of people.

Today, too many government boards refuse to continue offering the virtual access capability that has become a part of everyday life for many Iowans.

This is ironic, because while some government officials have balked, parents and grandparents and their kids have embraced the long-distance gatherings with Zoom and FaceTime. This technology has made the face-to-face conversations possible from the comfort of their separate homes. They can listen to Mom’s piano playing or marvel at the antics of the family dog.

While there still are many city councils, school boards, and boards of supervisors that continue to make their meetings available live for remote viewers, too many government bodies have signaled they don’t want to be bothered by making remote viewing possible.

These officials are not breaking any law by saying “no” to remote viewing requests. Iowa’s open meetings law does not require government boards to provide Zoom access. It only requires that meetings be open to the public.

Common sense should prevail—but too often it does not.

I spoke recently with a man who wanted to “Zoom” in to a meeting of the local school board. “We don’t do that,” was the reply that ended the discussion.

Never mind that having their meetings available on Zoom would allow people with child care responsibilities, or senior citizens, or the disabled, or those without ready access to transportation to “attend” the meetings of their school board. Never mind that supervisors’ meetings typically are held during the day, when many are at work and cannot get away to attend in person.

Getting more people engaged in their city council, school board, or board of supervisors is just good government. I remind government leaders during my presentations that government does not belong to them. It belongs to the people. Government employees and officials are entrusted to act with the public’s best interests in mind.

During the pandemic, one member of the Grundy County Board of Supervisors was deployed to the Middle East with his Iowa National Guard unit. He was still able to “attend” the supervisors’ meetings using his laptop computer and Zoom. But once he returned home after his deployment ended, the Zoom meetings ended, too.

County officials insisted they were not set up to provide Zoom access from the supervisors’ small meeting room. Of course, it’s that same small meeting room where officials expect the public to compete for the eight or 10 chairs available for spectators.

The Grundy County board recently considered an ordinance regulating wind turbines. The local newspaper editor, as a courtesy, informed county officials that he intended to carry the public hearing on the ordinance live on the newspaper’s Facebook page.

Officials initially tried to stop his planned livestream. In the end, they relented—and several hundred people watched the hearing live or afterward.

That brings up another objection I hear from government officials when I mention the pluses of having meetings available virtually. They claim not many people want to watch these meetings.

Iowa law does not require government boards to meet in public because those gatherings will be a big ratings blockbuster. The law says meetings shall be open to the public so the basis and rationale for boards’ decisions, as well as the decisions themselves, are easily accessible.

These days, many people believe that easily accessible means Zoom, as well as space for spectators in the meeting room.

If officials are not savvy enough to understand that, then maybe the Iowa legislature needs to get involved next session and “help” officials see the problem with their misguided opposition to Zoom.

Randy Evans can be reached at DMRevans2810@gmail.com.

Top image: Screenshot from official video of Clive City Council meeting on May 26, 2022. The suburb of Des Moines has continued to offer hybrid council meetings.

Maintenance Notice - As of November 14, 2023 we are still seeing issues with replying to comments...Thanks for your patience, this will be restored.

  • Fantastic article!

    Great article, Mr. Evans! I am disabled and homebound. When COVID began, my disabled friends and I had long conversations about how society was changing – and perhaps the world was learning that there is usually more than one way of doing things – such as holding both in-person and zoom meetings, as well as prompt availability of meeting agendas, minutes, and meeting transcripts or recordings.We may all have a personal preference for how we like to participate in things, but that preference cannot and should not be the only available option.

    Mr. Evans, do you know if any disabled people have had success in requesting Zoom meetings (such as a city council meeting or PTA meeting) from the perspective of needing a reasonable accommodation?