Jeff Fuhrman is an independent international finance director with significant experience in the former Soviet Union. He resides in Iowa with his husband and their dog, Harambe.
I write today to advocate for a return to good judgment and integrity in U.S. policies toward Ukraine.
The February 28 meeting between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy devolved into a shouting match. Apparently it was was too much for the Trump administration for Zelenskyy to cite real facts in front of media outlets that might actually broadcast them.
The rhetorical tactics Trump and Vice President JD Vance used in response (including “if all else fails, just talk over them, loudly”) may have worked for some of the audience, but the messaging apparently didn’t land right. The administration sent Secretary of State Marco Rubio out to do more damage control a few hours later.
Rubio highlighted what he could from the administration’s policy approach towards Ukraine—briefly, that war with Russia is bad, and the administration has successfully transcribed Russian President Vladimir Putin’s requirements to even appear at the negotiating table. But his appearance just made the U.S. look weak and feckless, as if we were representing Russia’s national interests to the detriment of our own.
And it’s no wonder—after a week or two of Trump’s teams undermining Ukrainian negotiating positions and parroting Putin’s talking points, there is little ground left for the secretary of state to stand on.
This is lunacy, and it is disloyal. It is rightly damaging our credibility on the world stage. Forget “America First”; this is actively throwing away our national interests. It must stop.
I spent most of the last 30 years working in international corporate finance. I have three relevant degrees and have conducted business and legal matters in more than 70 foreign jurisdictions, many in the former Soviet Union. I studied there, did business there, and taught Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance there. I even once led a business delegation to the deputy governor of a 1,200-year-old Russian state. I have a unique perspective on how abandoning Ukraine will harm us globally.
Trump’s appeasement on Ukraine will harm our national interests. All our international relations—trade, exports, investments, tourism, military positioning, getting the best STEM researchers to our universities (where they are trained in English), even church food aid—all our soft power depends on the U.S. being a trustworthy partner. (“Soybeans don’t sell themselves!” then-Iowa Governor Terry Branstad told me once when our trade missions crossed paths in a German airport.)
The president’s moves undermine basic treaty principles like “don’t do ethnic cleansing.” They also encourage aggressive countries to invade other sovereign territories, continue the supply shocks that are fueling inflation in food and energy markets, risk the security of nuclear facilities, and permit the wanton destruction of beautiful Odesa and Donbas. None of that is in our national interest. None of it.
Trump’s moves to switch sides will damage our integrity. Worst among the his actions is ending military aid to Ukraine. By doing this, we are reneging on security guarantees we made in exchange for Ukraine giving up their nuclear defenses.
Strong, proud nations do not just abandon their allies on the battlefield. (Yes, Europe can and should contribute more, but withdrawing our part will drag the war out, not hasten its end.)
I made many acquaintances in the former Soviet Union. They are practical people—raised with Billy Joel and blue jeans as much as with Vladimir Vysotsky (“the Russian Bob Dylan”) and borshcht. I was surprised by how many of them named Ronald Reagan as their favorite American president. (“A strong and proud leader,” I heard consistently.)
I can tell you one thing with certainty about the old Soviets: they don’t countenance disloyalty. Russian Tsar Peter III abruptly switched sides in the 7-Years’ War after his predecessor Elizabeth I died, even though thousands of Russians had already died in the conflict. His own elite guard regiment helped Catherine the Great dethrone him within six months.
In modern times, Vladimir Vysotsky, in his famous “Song About a Friend,” growled: “Take him climbing. If you fall, but he holds onto your ropes, he is trustworthy. If he whines or complains, send him away … he is someone else’s.”
If we allow Trump to go back on our word, even the Russians won’t deal with us in the future. They will see us abandon our ally and think worse of us for it.
“But it’s not in our interest to fight forever foreign wars,” you might say. That is true—certainly for conflicts started after our Cold-War-Era turn as the “Global Gendarme.” But this isn’t fighting other people’s wars; this is carrying through on our own promises.
And this isn’t some new territorial conflict in a far-flung country. This is about maintaining the security and safety of our biggest trading partners, about protecting places where many Americans have roots, and about keeping our word. If you think our precipitous withdrawal from Afghanistan harmed our reputation and made it more difficult to promote U.S. interests, consider how bad it will be when we appease the invading dictator on our allies’ borders.
I can say it no stronger than this: we will hang our heads in shame if Trump succeeds with this bad-faith disloyalty.
So, what is to be done? To do what is right and in our national interest, credible people must insist to our foreign policy makers that we not abandon Ukraine. Senior politicians like Senate President pro tempore Charles Grassley must adopt a red line on Ukraine and insist that Trump act with integrity and honor towards our allies.
Grassley and Iowa’s other Senator Joni Ernst can communicate to (former-Senator) Secretary Rubio how important consistent foreign policy is to American interests abroad. Other senior politicians like Alaska’s Senator Lisa Murkowski can maintain pressure on the administration to continue support for Ukraine and its people. Retired politicians like former Vice President Mike Pence must continue delivering the message in conservative media: Trump cannot be allowed to sell out Ukraine.
This isn’t about executive and legislative roles, committee assignments or party loyalty. This is about representing the honor and national interests of the United States of America.
The author recommends that readers listen to Vladimir Vysotsky’s “Song About a Friend”:
Editor’s note: This post has been corrected to remove a statement incorrectly attributed to Donald Trump, Jr.
7 Comments
Rep Zach Nunn should respond
Thank you, Jeff, for making the case for continuing to support our Ukraine and our European allies. It is strange that such an argument even has to be made. That has been the consensus for 80 years.
Congressman Zach Nunn is a long time Intelligence Officer for the Air Force, surely he is very knowledgeable about the threat from Russia and the capabilities of our allies. I would really like to read his response to your letter.
Miketram01 Tue 4 Mar 8:10 AM
Rep. Nunn informed
Done
Jeff Fuhrman Tue 4 Mar 11:06 AM
Ukraine
Who is abandoning them? Because you have a dust up in open negotiations is that such? He can’t tell us where he can’t tell us where the money the last admin gave him went to?
The dems want to use this as yet another 🥱 way to disparage trump. They sign the agreement on precious minerals we then have USA boots on the ground , not militarily wise , but to mine and extract the precious minerals. Meaning they are safer from Russian invasion with our workers their and present .
Midwestconservative Tue 4 Mar 11:19 AM
Jeff - Good stuff
You’re right, Iowa’s lawmakers are supporting this crazy shift in American policy. Congressman Zach Nunn, despite his deep understanding of the Russian threat, is unwilling to break ranks with Trump. As a member of the committee combating Chinese Communist Party influence, Nunn should be raising alarms about what Beijing will gain from the abandonment of our allies and partners – our primary advantage over China. Senator Ernst, a veteran serving on the Armed Services Committee, should remind Trump that appeasing revisionists like Putin rarely leads to lasting peace. Given his seniority, Senator Grassley is uniquely positioned to challenge Trump’s chaotic “deal-making.” The United States can reevaluate Ukraine aid without adopting Russian misinformation.
What is the end goal? A world in which Russia and China approve of U.S. policy but our allies forge their own path?
DrainO Tue 4 Mar 1:09 PM
Just gonna put these links here...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/03/02/russia-ukraine-trump-zelensky-clash/
https://www.barrons.com/articles/defense-stocks-trump-military-aid-ukraine-32436523
Jeff Fuhrman Tue 4 Mar 5:07 PM
Washington post
You’re free to post what you wish but using bias sources isn’t helping in the discussion. What will many say once trump and Ukraine come to an agreement? It will happen , lots of issues to deal with , if the nay sayers wheee in charge how would you end this conflict between Ukraine and Russia? 🇷🇺
So easy to chastise and yet so hard to have real resolve and get a resolution.
Midwestconservative Tue 4 Mar 9:21 PM
Defense stocks or any for that matter
If you think picking out. Day or a week of stocks is something to worry about? Stocks go up and down by the hour, the day and the week. It’s when your losing market share in its entirety is when your worried about the stock markets , as most people aren’t into just say defense stocks their portfolios cover many things, some go up and some go down. It’s the market !
Midwestconservative Tue 4 Mar 9:26 PM