which Dana Rudolph is hosting for the third year on this date at the Mombian blog. So far she has 28 people’s stories posted.
She explains how to contribute your stories, photos or videos here.
which Dana Rudolph is hosting for the third year on this date at the Mombian blog. So far she has 28 people’s stories posted.
She explains how to contribute your stories, photos or videos here.
Please put up a comment if I have left out any important events.
Monday, June 2:
Ed Fallon will be on the 98.3 WOW FM radio station’s show Mac’s World, beginning at 1:30 pm.
Tuesday, June 3:
Get out and vote in the Democratic primary!
Leonard Boswell’s election night party will be at the Hotel Fort Des Moines, Wedgewood Room, 1000 Walnut St in Des Moines, beginning at 8:30 pm. This seems to be open to the public, as I received a mass-mailed postcard invitation.
Ed Fallon’s election night party will be right next door at the Raccoon River Brewery, 10th and Mulberry in Des Moines, beginning at 9 pm.
Wednesday, June 4:
One Iowa is holding its last volunteer workshop where you can sign up for shifts at Pride this June. There will be a quick overview and training session to let you know about what the different volunteer needs and roles will be, where to check in and check out during Pride, and how this process will work. Immediately following will be a chance for you to ask any questions you may have and to sign up for volunteer shifts. The workshop will be at 6 pm, and you can RSVP here:
http://eqfed.org/oneiowa/event…
For questions, please contact One Iowa at (515)288-4019, or you can visit our web site at www.oneiowa.org.
Thursday, June 5:
Immigration in Iowa will be the topic of a forum at the DMACC Urban Campus (1100 7th St. in Des Moines) from 11 am to 12:30 pm. Confirmed panelists include: Alicia Claypool of the Iowa Immigration Education Coalition; David Roederer, executive director of the Iowa Chamber Alliance (representing 16 chambers of commerce in Iowa); James Benzoni, a Des Moines attorney specializing in immigration law and an adjunct faculty member of the Drake Law School in Des Moines; and state Rep. Beth Wessel-Kroeschell, D-Ames. The event, sponsored by IowaPolitics.com, DMACC and Mediacom, is free and open to the public, but reservations are required as lunches will be provided to the first 50 people who sign up to attend. For reservations call 515.226.8774 or e-mail Julie Rutz at rutz@IowaPolitics.com. Doors at DMACC Urban Campus will open at 10:30 a.m. Free parking will be available at the DMACC Urban Campus. The panel discussion will also be televised to a statewide audience on the Mediacom Connections Channel and will be available for On Demand viewing from Mediacom on Channel 1.
Derek Maurer invites anyone interested in peak oil to join him for a discussion of the topic Thursday, June 5, at 7 p.m. in Meeting Room E of the Iowa City Public Library. This will be an opportunity to learn more or share what you know about peak oil. Many Iowans are becoming more informed about the peak oil phenomenon, with its implication that the era of abundant and relatively cheap energy is drawing to a close. What can we do as a community to respond to the likelihood of this drastic change in the basis of our economy and society?
Friday, June 6:
The Matthew Shepard Scholarship Committee cordially invites you to Iowa’s 2008 Matthew Shepard Scholarship Awards Dinner. Featuring music by members of the Des Moines Gay Men’s Chorus, a keynote address by Iowa Board of Regents President David Miles, and presenting Iowa’s 2008 Matthew Shepard Scholarship Recipients.
Friday, June 6, 2007
5:30 PM Reception (Cash Bar)
6:45 PM Dinner and Program
$55.00 per Ticket
Hy-Vee Conference Center
5820 Westown Parkway
West Des Moines, Iowa 50266
Register here:
http://www.eychanerfoundation….
Continue Reading...Over at Daily Kos, nyceve put up another shocking diary about the practices of for-profit insurance companies in the U.S.
Today she links to this article from the New York Times about women facing higher insurance premiums, or even being denied insurance coverage, after giving birth by cesarean:
Insurers’ rules on prior Caesareans vary by company and also by state, since the states regulate insurers, said Susan Pisano of America’s Health Insurance Plans, a trade group. Some companies ignore the surgery, she said, but others treat it like a pre-existing condition.
“Sometimes the coverage will come with a rider saying that coverage for a Caesarean delivery is excluded for a period of time,” Ms. Pisano said. Sometimes, she said, applicants with prior Caesareans are charged higher premiums or deductibles.
This problem could affect millions of American women:
In 2006, more than 1.2 million Caesareans were performed in the United States, and researchers estimate that each year, half a million women giving birth have had previous Caesareans.
“Obstetricians are rendering large numbers of women uninsurable by overusing this surgery,” said Pamela Udy, president of the International Caesarean Awareness Network, a group whose mission is to prevent unnecessary Caesareans.
Although many women who have had a Caesarean can safely have a normal birth later, something that Ms. Udy’s group advocates, in recent years many doctors and hospitals have refused to allow such births, because they carry a small risk of a potentially fatal complication, uterine rupture. Now, Ms. Udy says, insurers are adding insult to injury. Not only are women feeling pressure to have Caesareans that they do not want and may not need, but they may also be denied coverage for the surgery.
The New York Times piece also mentions one woman who was rejected for coverage by the Golden Rule Insurance Company:
She was turned down because she had given birth by Caesarean section. Having the operation once increases the odds that it will be performed again, and if she became pregnant and needed another Caesarean, Golden Rule did not want to pay for it. A letter from the company explained that if she had been sterilized after the Caesarean, or if she were over 40 and had given birth two or more years before applying, she might have qualified.
Great news–all she has to do to get health insurance coverage is be sterilized!
Seriously, we need a national health care policy that prohibits insurance companies from refusing to cover people with pre-existing conditions.
Until that happens, women would be advised to do whatever they can to reduce their risk of having a c-section.
Some surgical births are unavoidable, and in those cases it is a lifesaving procedure. However, there are ways to reduce the risk of having an unnecessary cesarean.
I advise women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant to strongly consider using a midwife for your prenatal care, labor and delivery. Most midwives have a far lower cesarean rate in their practices than obstetricians.
One New Jersey hospital that has a thriving midwifery program has the second-lowest rate of c-sections in that state, “despite serving a low-income urban patient population that is more likely to have high-risk pregnancies.”
Hiring a certified doula to help the mother during labor and delivery has been shown to reduce the rate of cesarean births as well. You can have a doula assist you whether you are under the care of a midwife, an obstetrician or a family doctor, whether you give birth in a hospital, a birth center or at home.
You should also seek information about the c-section rates of the hospitals and birth centers in your area, if you have a choice. As I mentioned in this post on cesarean births in Iowa, the percentage of babies born by c-section can vary widely from hospital to hospital.
For more information on cesarean births and the benefits of having a doula, click here.
Continue Reading...Congressman Leonard Boswell’s campaign put out a press release on Saturday seeking to contrast the incumbent’s record with Ed Fallon’s record on fighting methamphetamine use in Iowa:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 31, 2008
CONTACT:
Betsy Shelton, 515-238-3356
Boswell Committed to Fighting Iowa’s Meth Crisis
Des Moines, IA – Today Polk County Attorney John Sarcone and Dave Murillo, President of the Des Moines Police Burial and Protective Association, praised Congressman Leonard Boswell for his important work and leadership in fighting Iowa’s methamphetamine crisis.
Boswell thanked Sarcone and Murillo for their support. “John Sarcone and Dave Murillo are out there fighting the meth epidemic every day. I will continue to do all I can to help secure funding to provide law enforcement with the proper tools and training to end the manufacture and use of methamphetamine.”
“Congressman Boswell has been a staunch ally and supporter of law enforcement during his tenure in Washington,” said Murillo. :He is a rarity in politics today as he is man of his word. Leonard has taken a strong stand against the illegal narcotics trade, and the manufacture, sale and use of illegal drugs. Leonard has always been a huge supporter of law enforcement and public safety.”
“Congressman Boswell was ahead of the curve on fighting the meth epidemic when he co-founded the Congressional Caucus to Fight and Control Methamphetamine,” stated Polk County Attorney John Sarcone. “He secured funding for the Drug Endangered Children program which has dramatically helped law enforcement get special services to children whose parents used and manufactured meth in home.” Sarcone added, “Ed Fallon has never championed any cause for law enforcement. Leonard has always been there for us and his fight against the meth epidemic is a perfect example of his support of law enforcement.”
During his legislative tenure, Fallon opposed appropriations to fight the growing meth epidemic and to establish mandatory jail sentences for persons found in possession of methamphetamine. Fallon also voted against increased funding for law enforcement in the fight against meth. He was one of only six House members to vote against a $3.3 million plan to fight Iowa’s meth epidemic with a combination of treatment, education, and tougher enforcement measures. At the time, Fallon told the Cedar Rapids Gazette, “This bill is the easy way out.” Fallon was the only House member to oppose an increase in penalties for people manufacturing meth in the presence of a minor.
Congressman Boswell served as co-chair of the Congressional Caucus to Fight and Control Methamphetamine, and has championed legislation that has successfully clamped down on the meth labs that threaten Iowa’s communities. Boswell has long been a leader in the fight against methamphetamine use.
I was not living in Iowa in 1999, when the legislature approved the $3.3 million bill on methamphetamine. I was unable to find the article quoting Fallon on the Cedar Rapids Gazette’s website. However, when I contacted Fallon’s campaign for a comment on this press release, they forwarded the entire article to me.
Here is a larger excerpt from the Cedar Rapids Gazette article from March 16, 1999:
Detractors of the bill said it will add burden to already overcrowded county jails and courthouses and mask the inadequate response to treatment with get-tough enforcement measures that are easier to tout politically.
“In my very strong opinion, this bill is not going to do it,” said Rep. Ed Fallon, D-Des Moines, one of six representatives to oppose the measure. “This bill is the easy way out. If this legislation is going to be taken seriously, we’re going to have to appropriate quite a bit of money.”
So while the Boswell press release gives the impression that Fallon was not interested in fighting meth use in Iowa, the context makes clear that Fallon opposed the bill because it did not do enough to address the problem.
Did the 1999 legislation solve the meth use problem in Iowa? Apparently not, because a state government report issued in October 2004 determined that “Methamphetamine has become an increasing problem in Iowa over the last 10 years.”
Since that 1999 bill was enacted, the Iowa legislature has addressed methamphetamine several more times. The most significant effort seems to be Senate File 169, which passed the legislature unanimously in 2005. Instead of increasing the penalties for manufacturing meth, that law sought to restrict access to a component used in manufacturing meth. State Drug Policy Coordinator Marvin L. Van Haaften reported to the legislature the following year,
Senate File 169-unanimously approved last year by the Legislature, signed into law by Governor Vilsack, and implemented May 21, 2005-classified the key ingredient used to make methamphetamine (meth) as a Schedule V Controlled Substance. Commonly referred to as Iowa’s pseudoephedrine (PSE) control or meth lab reduction law, this statute removed all cold and allergy products containing PSE from store shelves and placed the vast majority of them behind the pharmacy counter to be dispensed on a controlled non-prescription basis.
Between June and December 2005, Iowa meth lab incidents plummeted nearly 80 percent compared to the same period in 2004, as shown in the month-by-month comparisons from the Iowa Department of Public Safety, Division of Narcotics Enforcement below.
[…]
The imprint of Senate File 169 on public safety may be summed up best by one of the State’s top prosecutors. United States Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa-Charles Larson-has stated publicly that in his many years of public service in the criminal justice arena he’s “never seen one law have a larger impact on reducing crime.”
It’s certainly worthwhile to reduce the number of meth labs operating in Iowa. But did the 2005 law reduce meth use or meth addiction in this state?
Not according to the state drug policy coordinator’s 2006 report:
Verbatim drug treatment survey comments:
• “Our meth clients have large numbers of special needs that overwhelm our case managers…Treatment is taking longer because of reduced cognitive ability, which needs to be addressed in order to obtain participation in the treatment process.”
• “The number of female clients reporting meth usage has increased.”
• “Our available data indicate no substantial change in the areas outlined in this survey since the pseudoephedrine control law has been in effect.”
• “I have actually had clients tell me that the law has impacted the ability to make meth in northeast Iowa, and therefore the availability.”
• “The State must understand that while the new law regulating the purchase of pseudoephedrine has worked to reduce the number of meth labs in the State, the incidence and prevalence of meth abuse continues to rise. This is not a failure of the law, but the realities of the epidemic.”
All signs point toward a continued strong demand for meth in Iowa. At best, meth use appears to be holding steady at a relatively high level. At worst, more Iowans are getting hooked on this super-addictive stimulant.
Sounds like Fallon was right in 1999, when he called for allocating more resources to treating methamphetamine addicts.
Here is a link to a pdf file containing Marvin L. Van Haaften’s report from January 2006.
Continue Reading...Iowa Voters has an important post up reminding us that Iowans can register to vote right at the polling place on primary day.
If you know people who are not planning to vote this Tuesday because they are not registered, or have moved since the last time they voted or caucused, be sure to let them know that they can still participate in the primaries. Iowa Voter writes:
These late registrations have tougher rules because you must prove your identity and residence in the precinct. Use your driver’s license or other government-issued photo id card. If the card shows an incorrect address, you can use other documents to establish your address: your lease, utility bill, bank statement, government document, or paycheck that shows your address.
Use this information to help get out the vote for the candidate of your choice.
Click the link to read how Iowans can also register on election day by having an already registered voter in the precinct vouch for them. I wouldn’t gamble on every polling place worker understanding this aspect of the law, though.
Continue Reading...<!–StartFragment–>
Six months ago I made my first official contact with each and every Democratic County Chair, introducing myself, and my candidacy for the United States House of Representatives. Six months later, Chairpersons in key counties still deny me access to their Democrats. I have asked multiple times, and even done so in my email newsletters, viewed by thousands of Democrats in the fourth district. Additionally, my email news program allows me to track who opens the emails, the date and time they opened them, links they may have clicked on, and who they may have forwarded the emails to.
<!–EndFragment–>
Continue Reading...Please go back and persuade John Edwards to hire Sarah Susanka (the Not So Big House woman) to design his Chapel Hill home.
Failing that, please go back and convince Barack Obama to resign from Trinity United Church of Christ before running for president, instead of right before the general election campaign.
Seriously, if Obama was going to leave his church to limit the potential damage to his political ambitions, he should have done it a long time ago. Doing it now, after everyone has seen Reverend Wright’s rants on television, just looks like pandering.
Ed Fallon’s campaign sent out a press release on Friday highlighting points he made in a resolution he offered as a member of the Iowa House before the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003.
Click here to read House Resolution 17, which Fallon offered and 20 other Iowa House Democrats co-sponsored. The resolution didn’t go anywhere; Republicans controlled the chamber in 2003.
Here is the release from the Fallon campaign:
Before the War, Fallon Took Lead Against Invading Iraq
Friday, May 30, 2008 (4:30 PM CDT) – Today, Ed Fallon reiterated that the war in Iraq is one of the main reasons he decided to challenge Congressman Boswell. Boswell voted for the war and continued to vote to fund it until last year. Fallon said, “Congressman Boswell says in his mailers that he’s standing up to George Bush to end the war. But where was he most of the past five years?”
In stark contrast, while serving as a State Representative in 2003, Ed Fallon authored HR 17 to encourage the President not to initiate a preemptive, unilateral military strike against Iraq. Fallon was joined by 20 other Democrats who co-sponsored the resolution.
Fallon claimed he had it right, stating in HR 17 that the war would:
* Undermine our efforts to bring Osama bin Laden to justice. Bin Laden remains at large.
* Destabilize the region. Iran has only grown in influence as a result of the war.
* Turn into a humanitarian disaster. Iraqi civilians have suffered greatly throughout the war.
* Lead to a long-term military presence in Iraq. U.S. troops have now been in Iraq longer than they were engaged in WWII.
* Cause America to bear most of the financial cost of the war, which we have.
* Cost between $100 billion and $1 trillion, and we are now almost at a trillion dollars.
* Cost us $15-$20 billion per year. That was a conservative estimate: the actual cost is about $12 billion a month, or $144 billion a year.
* Cause deeper federal budget deficits, further weakening the economy and undermining of the long-term prospects for solvency the Social Security and Medicare systems.
Fallon says, “Those who voted for this war had it wrong on so many levels. They were duped by President Bush’s propaganda machine and failed to understand how the war would cripple our economy, leave thousands dead or injured, and polarize our nation. Congress needs leaders who are able to think critically before similar mistakes are made in the future.”
Before the Iowa caucuses, Barack Obama’s presidential campaign widely distributed the text and the DVD of the speech he gave in October 2002 opposing pre-emptive war in Iraq.
It makes sense for Fallon to emphasize this point in light of Congressman Leonard Boswell’s campaign communications that say the incumbent is “working every day” to end the war and bring the troops home.
The question is how many Democratic voters will hear this message from the Fallon campaign. This is where the resources for district-wide direct mail or television ads would have come in handy.
Fallon was scheduled to be at the downtown Des Moines farmer’s market all morning today. (More than 10,000 people attend that market on a typical Saturday.) I have another commitment today, but if you saw Fallon’s booth at the market, please post a comment to let us know what kind of campaign literature was being distributed. Did they have anything focusing on his early opposition to the Iraq War?
Continue Reading...Wow, I never knew Red Brannan, one of the developers who would like to see a four-lane beltway constructed in rural northeast Polk County, was so mad when Ed Fallon voted against residency restrictions for sex offenders in 2002.
But that vote must have really gotten Brannan riled up, because today I got another direct-mail piece on the issue from the 527 group Independent Voices. On Tuesday a similar mailer arrived from the same group, which I transcribed here. Matt Stoller put a scanned image of the earlier mailer up at Open Left.
Today’s mailer has a large photo of an empty child’s swing, next to these words in large print:
Would you want a sex offender living near your kid’s school?
At the bottom in small print it says, “Paid for By Independent Voices, Red Brannan Chair.” Hey, at least there’s a union bug next to that line!
On the flip side the same photo of an empty swing appears faintly. There’s a smaller picture of Fallon near the bottom of the page, holding up one finger, as if lecturing. These words appear on the page:
Ed Fallon put kids at risk simply to make a political statement
When Ed Fallon had the chance to stop convicted sex offenders from living near our schools, he thought it was more important to make a political statement than to protect our kids. He cast the only vote against this prohibition in the state house.
Our kids have enough challenges, why would Ed let these predators live next to our schools?
Associated Press October 14, 2005
Fallon concedes he is the only lawmaker who opposed the restrictions.
“There was a fear that if we don’t support this bill we’ll be viewed as weak on crime.”
Call Ed at 515.277.0424
Tell Ed our kids are more important than his politics. As him to oppose letting convicted sex offenders live near our schools.
The hypocrisy of this mailing is breathtaking. As I mentioned in the post about the previous mailer on this subject, residency restrictions for sex offenders do nothing to reduce crimes against children–prosecutors and children’s advocates agree on this point. The proponents of these laws are the ones who would rather “make a political statement” than protect our kids.
The Des Moines Register’s editorial board described the earlier mailer from Independent Voices as “the cheapest of cheap shots.”
This letter to the editor, published today, made several great points as well:
The 2,000-foot law was passed as a knee-jerk reaction to high-profile abuse cases. The result has been a drop in the number of sex offenders registering their address and the creation of rural communities comprising mainly sex offenders. What the law fails to take into account is the fact that only a small minority of sex offenders are playground pedophiles.
About 80 percent of abuse victims knew the offender and 43 percent are relatives. I ask both Fallon and U.S. Rep. Leonard Boswell, along with all other lawmakers, to take the time to develop sensible laws that promote rehabilitation and judge offenses on a case-by-case basis. Sexually active high schoolers shouldn’t be categorized with rapists and punished just as harshly.
– Jade Howser Nagel, Urbandale
The political posturing of the majority of Iowa legislators has drained law enforcement resources and led to fewer sex offenders registering their addresses. That doesn’t keep my two young kids or anyone else’s kids safer, and Red Brannan’s group should know this very well.
Will this mailing scare third district Democrats away from Fallon, or will it backfire? Your guess is as good as mine.
Continue Reading...which has received the 2008 State Leadership Award from the American Wind Energy Association. This is from a press release that circulated on the Iowa Renewable Energy Association’s e-mail loop:
“Governor Culver and his team in Iowa have been extraordinarily effective in drawing wind power companies to their state – in the heart of America’s ‘wind belt,'” said AWEA Executive Director Randall Swisher. “They have helped launch a new wave of clean-energy-based economic activity in the Midwest, attracting at least five major manufacturers to Iowa through innovative policy and aggressive, pro-business strategies. We’re glad to recognize their leadership with this award.”
[…]Iowa is number one in the nation in wind generation as percentage of total generation, with 5.5% (1,271 MW) of its total electricity generated by wind power facilities. The state’s strong manufacturing base, excellent transportation infrastructure and skilled workforce have made it attractive to manufacturers. In addition, the Iowa Power Fund promotes the state’s burgeoning wind industry and provides a $100 million grant resource to companies and researchers in Iowa who are fostering renewable energy within the state.
This industry would grow further if we could get the Democratic leaders in our state legislature to pass an ambitious renewable portfolio standard (for instance, requiring that 20 percent of Iowa’s energy be generated from renewable sources by 2020).
The Iowa Department of Economic Development has been doing a lot of good things the past couple of years. It’s always nice when good work is acknowledged.
The full text of the AWEA’s press release is after the jump.
Continue Reading...Al Gore has already sent out e-mails and letters raising money for Congressman Leonard Boswell, and now he has a starring role in the direct-mail piece I received today from the Boswell campaign.
I don’t have any problem with Gore campaigning for Boswell.
I do wish Boswell had absorbed the message of Gore’s September 2002 speech on “Iraq and the War on Terrorism.”
I also wish Boswell had talked with Gore before voting for George Bush’s energy bill in 2005.
Finally, I wish Boswell would have signed on as a co-sponsor of the Safe Climate Act last summer, when many House Democrats did, instead of waiting until December, after he had learned Ed Fallon was planning to run against him.
A description and full transcript of Boswell’s direct-mail piece is after the jump.
Continue Reading...Leonard Boswell is airing TV ads in the Des Moines market where he highlights his opposition to Bush on funding cuts to the college loan program and says he is a loyal Democrat.
That is commendable, but where was Boswell on the issues that matter most to Iowans?
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats and supported Bush's failed Iraq policy.
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats to approve torture in the Military Commissions Act.
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats to repeal the estate tax.
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats to make it harder for people (and easier for corporations) to declare bankruptcy.
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats and supported No Child Left Behind.
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats and pushed to give Telecom companies immunity for illegal wiretapping Americans.
Boswell continues to support NAFTA-like free trade agreements.
Boswell voted against the majority of Democrats to give oil and gas companies $14 billion in tax breaks.
Sorry Rep. Boswell, but voting against the majority of Democrats in Congress on the issues that matter most to Iowans does not make you a loyal Democrat.
I have not seen this ad yet, and I can’t find anything on You Tube or Leonard Boswell’s campaign website, but the Des Moines Register on Wednesday summarized a 30-second television commercial Boswell has started running:
OPPOSITION TO BUSH: Boswell, who is seeking his seventh term, highlights in the ad his opposition to proposed Bush administration spending cuts in college loan programs this year. Boswell, facing a challenge from former state Rep. Ed Fallon of Des Moines, has been criticized by some liberals for supporting some Bush administration proposals.
A LOYAL DEMOCRAT: The ad closes with a narrator saying, “Leonard Boswell, a trusted Democrat, always standing up for you.”
I’ll update this post with the video if someone can send me the link.
Good for Boswell for opposing spending cuts in college loan programs. (If he had been consistently willing to stand up to the Bush administration and the Republican policy agenda, this primary wouldn’t even be happening, but that’s another story.)
Also on Wednesday, I received a direct-mail piece from the Boswell campaign about Ed Fallon’s support for Ralph Nader in 2000. This is the third such mailing the campaign has sent out. The first two hit mailboxes in April, and I transcribed them here and here.
This mailing is similar in design, but it uses a normal font instead of that “scary font” that looks like it came from a ransom note, which appeared in the earlier two Nader mailings.
On one side, there’s a photo of the bottom half of Fallon’s smiling face, and this text (partly in white, partly in Hawkeye gold against a black background):
Ed Fallon opposed Al Gore in 2000
“If I had three hands maybe I could hold my nose, my gut and my mouth and vote for Al Gore. But in good conscience, I can’t, I won’t, and you shouldn’t either.”
(New York Times, 10/29/2000)
Fallon supported Ralph Nader instead…
The other side has large photos of Fallon’s and Nader’s faces next to each other. The text reads:
Ed Fallon Let Iowa Democrats Down by Endorsing Ralph Nader
Ed Fallon claims to be a real Democrat, but in 2000 he helped elect George Bush by endorsing and actively campaigning for Ralph Nader.1 The Bush presidency has been a disaster. We are mired in a War with no exit strategy and have an economy in recession with rising costs that are hurting Iowans. Ed Fallon now says it was a mistake, but his judgment let Iowa Democrats and our nation down–how can we trust him to represent our values in Congress?
1 Des Moines Register, 1/25/01, 11/18/00, 10/31/00
Enough Phony Politics. Say NO to Ed Fallon.
For several weeks a photo of Gore along with a quote supporting Boswell have been prominently featured on the front page of Boswell’s campaign website.
I’ve been saying all year that Nader is a strong card for Boswell to play, because it’s the only way for this incumbent who has repeatedly voted with Republicans and corporate interests to cast himself as a more loyal Democrat than Fallon.
I know people who are voting for Boswell solely because of Nader.
That said, many Gore voters like myself have decided that this isn’t a deal-breaker, in light of Boswell’s voting record.
I have no idea whether a third Nader mailing will push additional voters into Boswell’s camp. By now everyone politically active knows about this issue.
Final, unrelated point: Marc Hansen’s latest column on Boswell’s refusal to debate is funny.
Continue Reading...The day after I received a misleading hit piece on Ed Fallon, a second mailer from the 527 group Independent Voices arrived in the mail.
This one shows a cornfield on one side, with these words in large print:
Why Doesn’t Ed Fallon
Support Iowa’s
Ethanol Industry?
At the bottom of that side, it says, “Paid for By Independent Voices, Red Brannan Chair”
The other side has corn kernels in the background, as well as a photo of Fallon and a graphic of a container for gasoline with corn flowing out of the spout. The text on this page says,
CORN
Helping Us Become Independent of Foreign Oil
Iowa’s ability to produce corn efficiently has helped us become the national leader for ethanol production.
Alternative fuels are one way to end our dependence on Middle East oil. Ending that oil dependence could also revitalize Iowa’s economy if we are able to continue our national leadership in alternative fuel production.
So why did Ed Fallon say he wouldn’t support subsidies for ethanol production right here in Iowa?
Call Ed at 515.277.0420
Tell Ed Fallon he should quit supporting policies that cost us money at the pump.
Of course, this direct-mail piece doesn’t tell the whole story. Many people think subsidies to support corn-based ethanol production are no longer needed. Fallon advocates moving toward producing ethanol from cellulosic sources other than corn, and there are strong arguments in favor of doing so.
I mentioned in my earlier post that Fallon’s position on other issues (besides the ones mentioned in these mailers) run counter to the interests of Brannan, a developer.
If anyone has information about other donors who are funding the Independent Voices group, please either put up a comment in this thread or e-mail me confidentially at desmoinesdem AT yahoo.com.
UPDATE: The fliers sent by Independent Voices are discussed in this article from Thursday’s Des Moines Register:
Fallon supports ethanol subsidies, although he has said corn-based ethanol is not a permanent solution to weaning the United States off imported petroleum. “Corn-based ethanol is a step in the right direction, but it’s not the end of that journey,” Fallon said.The mailers list the group’s chairman as Red Brannan, an Ankeny Democrat and former member of the Polk County Board of Supervisors. Aides to Boswell said Brannan has not made financial contributions to the campaign. Attempts to reach Brannan Wednesday evening were unsuccessful.
I believe that Brannan has not donated directly to Boswell’s campaign, because I couldn’t find his name when I searched for it at Open Secrets.
Remember, a person can make unlimited donations to a group like Independent Voices, whereas contributions to a Congressional campaign are capped at $2,300 for the primary and $2,300 for the general election.
The Des Moines Register’s editorial board slammed the first mailing from Independent Voices as “the cheapest of cheap shots” and has called on Boswell to reject the tactics used by Brannan’s group.
Continue Reading...Last week I told you about Senator Tom Harkin’s contest to determine which Iowa House and Senate candidates will receive campaign donations from him.
Anyone can sign up at his website and vote for their favored candidates (though as
John Deeth noted, Harkin has excluded a few candidates who are challenging Democratic incumbents).
Today Harkin sent out this mass e-mail announcing the first-round winners:
After over a week of voting and thousands of votes cast on TomHarkin.com for Iowa’s best and brightest progressive leaders, I am proud to announce the top 20 House candidates and the top 10 Senate candidates.
For the Iowa State House you nominated: Tom Avenarius (D-32), McKinley Bailey (D-9), Cayle Baresel (D-17), Frank Best (D-87), Ron Fedler (D-91), Gene Ficken (D-23), Elesha Gayman (D-84), Tim Hoy (D-44), Kurt Hubler (D-99), Gretchen Lawyer (D-36), Larry Marek (D-89), Chris Nelson (D-58), Eric Palmer (D-75), Matthew Pfaltzgraf (D-70), Mark Smith (D-43), TJ Templeton (D-3), James Van Bruggen (D-4), Pat Van Zante (D-71), Andrew Wenthe (D-18), Nate Willems (D-29).
For the Iowa State Senate you nominated: Randy Braden (D-20), Swati Dandekar (D-18), Jeff Danielson (D-10), Mike Gronstal (D-50), Mary Jo Wilhelm (D-8), Pam Jochum (D-14), Tom Rielly (D-38), Sharon Savage (D-40), Steve Sodders (D-22), Frank Wood (D-42).
The level of enthusiasm you displayed in the nominating round of our “Building Blue” competition shows that Iowa Democrats are fired up and have the energy we need to win in November.
Now the fun part of our competition really gets under way.
Starting today and ending Tuesday, June 3rd, you and your friends and family can click here to vote for your favorite candidate.
The top 5 vote getters from the House and Senate will each receive a $2,000 donation for their campaigns.
These 10 finalists will then advance to the final round, starting June 4, where you will then pick the winner of a $5,000 contribution.
Thank you for supporting these legislative candidates and congratulations to all of these leaders for their service to the people of Iowa.
Be sure to visit www.TomHarkin.com today to vote for your favorite candidate in the second round. And let’s continue building Iowa blue for November.
Sincerely,
Senator Tom Harkin
If you plan to vote for any candidates for the second round, I urge you not to select Democrats in safe seats. For instance, Mike Gronstal does not need any extra money from Harkin to get re-elected.
Please choose either candidates trying to win Republican seats, incumbents who are being targeted by the GOP, or candidates trying to hold seats vacated by retiring Democrats.
You can use this comment thread to make the case for the candidates you’re supporting.
Continue Reading...No time for a long post now, but you can read the Des Moines Register’s endorsement of Becky Greenwald here.
I had a feeling they would go that way.
Let’s try to keep it civil, people. The editorial board had nice things to say about all the candidates.
If anyone attends tonight’s candidate forum in Ames, please put up a diary afterwards.
When the Des Moines Register headlined its endorsement of Ed Fallon “Unleash Fallon’s Energy in Congress,” it reminded me that I have not yet transcribed the Fallon campaign’s main piece of literature.
Chase Martyn suggested today that Fallon’s campaign has “spent more on printing its glossy, full-color brochures than it probably should have, considering it has not yet sent out districtwide direct mail.” That may be true, but Fallon volunteers and staffers have been handing out this 11 by 16-inch tri-fold while canvassing or tabling at public events for months. Thousands of Democrats in the district would have received it by now.
After the jump I’ve transcribed the brochure that lays out the central arguments of the Fallon campaign.
Continue Reading...An 8 1/2 by 11 direct-mail piece arrived in the mail today from a 527 group called Independent Voices. On one side there’s a big photo of a man in an orange jump suit labeled “PRISONER,” who is looking through a chain-link fence at a group of children. The text reads
Why Does Ed Fallon Think It’s O.K. For Sex Offenders to Live Near Schools?
Ed Fallon voted to allow sex offenders to live within 2,000 feet of our schools and day care centers
At the bottom in small print it says, “Paid for by Independent Voices, Red Brannan Chair”
The other side has the same photo of the prisoner, with a large photo of Ed Fallon and the following text superimposed:
Fallon Cast the Only Vote To Allow Sex Offenders to Live Near our Schools
Associated Press October 14, 2005
Fallon concedes he is the only lawmaker who opposed the restrictions.
“There was a fear that if we don’t support this bill we’ll be viewed as weak on crime.”
Parents know how many challenges kids face after they leave the house for school. Ed Fallon thought it was more important to cast his vote to make a political statement than to cast a vote that protects our kids from these dangerous predators. That’s not the help our kids need.
Call Ed at 515.277.0424
Tell Ed that sex offenders shouldn’t be living next to our schools.
First, it’s important to note that Red Brannan is a developer who disagrees with Fallon’s stands on reducing urban sprawl and curbing abuses of eminent domain. Brannan and many other developers would like to see a four-lane beltway constructed through a rural area in northeast Polk County. Boswell is committed to seeking federal funding for this project, which would require hundreds of millions of dollars in public spending. Fallon opposes the northeast Polk County beltway for various reasons; it’s a bad use of federal transportation dollars and would be bad for the environment as well.
But let’s take this mailer at face value and assume that Red Brannan and the rest of the financial backers of this 527 group really are bent out of shape over Fallon’s vote on the sex offender residency restriction law.
There are two kinds of laws: those that address a problem, and those that give a politically convenient appearance of addressing a problem.
At least 22 states have barred sex offenders from living within a certain distance of schools, but it’s misleading to suggest that those laws do anything to protect children from predators:
But residency restrictions for sex offenders not only don’t seem to be working as promised, there’s some indication that by hindering smarter practices they help increase the danger of molestation. And despite their popularity with lawmakers and the public, they have not been universally embraced, even by those in the law enforcement community. A January 2007 resolution passed by the American Correctional Association declares, “There is no evidence to support the efficacy of broadly applied residential restrictions on sex offenders.” A 2006 statement issued by the Iowa County Attorneys Association on that state’s residency restriction requirements takes a similar view, asserting, “There is no demonstrated protective effect of the residency requirement that justifies the huge draining of scarce law enforcement resources in the effort to enforce the restriction.”
Got that? They do nothing to reduce crimes against children and drain resources away from law enforcement.
Not only that, prosecutors and advocates for missing and exploited children agree on the uselessness of such laws:
In Iowa, which in 2002 became one of the first states to impose residency restrictions, police and prosecutors have united in opposition to the law, saying that it drives offenders underground and that there is “no demonstrated protective effect,” according to a statement by the Iowa County Attorneys Association, which represents prosecutors.
“The law was well-intentioned, but we don’t see any evidence of a connection between where a person lives and where they might offend,” said Corwin R. Ritchie, executive director of the group.
Enforcing the law consumes lots of law enforcement time, he said, and leads some offenders to list interstate rest stops or Wal-Mart parking lots as their addresses.
“Our concern is that these laws may give a false sense of security,” said Carolyn Atwell-Davis, director of legislative affairs for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. “We’re not aware of any evidence that residency restrictions have prevented a child from being victimized.”
So while the mailer accuses Fallon of casting his vote “to make a political statement,” the opposite is true: all of the other legislators who voted for this bill were making a political statement rather than doing something real to help protect children and support law enforcement efforts.
One reason Fallon is so unpopular with the legislative leadership is that he refused to go along with this kind of phony “solution” when he was in the Iowa House.
The irony is that in its endorsement of Fallon, the Des Moines Register mentioned this very vote as an example of how he was “frequently on the right side of issues.” The editorial board noted that the residency restriction has driven up costs for law enforcement while making it more difficult for them to track sex offenders.
But I’m not surprised that a group of Boswell backers resorted to this misleading line of attack. Anything that diverts voters’ attention from Boswell’s voting record, which is out of step with the Democrats he represents, can’t be bad for the incumbent.
I have no idea whether this mailer will significantly increase support for Boswell or whether it will primarily make Fallon’s supporters that much more determined to get out the vote.
Continue Reading...Please let me know in the comments if I’ve missed other noteworthy events this week.
Send me an e-mail at desmoinesdem AT yahoo.com to tell me about events I should put on the calendar for future weeks.
Tuesday, May 27:
The Iowa Global Warming Campaign, Sierra Club and I-Renew are hosting a free “Everyday is Earth Day” event from 6:30 – 8:30 p.m at the Bettendorf Public Library, 2950 Learning Campus Dr @ 18th St in Bettendorf. There will be refreshments and a film screening of “Global Warming: the Signs and the Science,” a film that uses expert dialogues on global warming to talk about how we can reverse its course. After the film, attendees will have the opportunity to ask questions and participate in a discussion.
The Iowa ONE Vote 08 Summer Kick-Off Event will be at the 4th Street Theatre at Java Joe’s, 214 Fourth Street, Downtown Des Moines. Open gallery reception featuring photo exhibition from ONE Vote 08 starts at 6:30 pm. Free concert featuring Jason Walsmith & Mike Butterworth of The Nadas starts at 7:30 pm. for more information contact Libby Crimmings at 515-280-4861 or libby.crimmings AT one.org
One Iowa is hosting a volunteer workshop at 6 pm in preparation for pride month in June. More information is here: http://eqfed.org/oneiowa/event…
Wednesday, May 28:
Working Families Win is sponsoring a fourth District Candidate Forum to discuss issues of health care, jobs and wages, the economy, and trade issues. The forum will take place from 7 pm to 8:30 pm in the Ames City Auditorium, 515 Clark Avenue in Ames. Tom Latham and all four of his Democratic opponents have been invited. I don’t know how many will attend. William Meyers indicated in a diary here that he will boycott the forum because of differences with one of the organizers:
http://www.bleedingheartland.c…
One Iowa, in partnership with the Iowa Civil Rights Commission and the Greater Des Moines Partnership, is pleased to host a breakfast presentation on LGBT employees and consumers with Joe Solmonese, President of Human Rights Campaign. “Putting Policy into Practice: Gay and Lesbian Employees and Customers,” will take place from 7:30 – 9:00 AM at the Greater Des Moines Partnership Building, 700 Locust St. Downtown, Arthur Davis Conference Room (Street Level). RSVP here: http://eqfed.org/oneiowa/event…
Candidate forum for the Democratic primary in Iowa’s third Congressional district, 7 pm at the State Historical Society of Iowa Building, 600 E Locust in Des Moines. Ed Fallon will be there, and Leonard Boswell will be represented by an empty podium, since he declined the invitation. Principal Sponsors are the Progressive Coalition of Central Iowa (PCCI) and Central Iowa Operation Democracy (CIOD). Co Sponsors are Women’s International League of Peace and Freedom (WILPF), Iowa Chapter of Methodist Federation for Social Action (MFSA), and Clarion Alliance.
Leonard Boswell will be a guest on the “Outdoors with Outdoor Dan” radio show on KRNT 1350 AM at 6 pm. (But remember, he’s too busy working in Washington to debate!)
Thursday, May 29:
Ed Fallon will appear on Jan Mickelson’s radio show at 9:00 am, WHO 1040 AM.
Leonard Boswell will take an aerial tour of Grimes with Grimes Mayor Tom Armstrong at 8 am.
Boswell will attend a Smile Squad program at 10 am highlighting the need for better dental care services for disadvantaged children. Garton Elementary School, 2820 East 24th St. in Des Moines.
Boswell and Secretary of State Michael Mauro will visit the South Side Senior Center, 100 Payton Avenue in Des Moines, from 11 am to 12 pm.
Friday, May 30:
Leonard Boswell will attend the dedication of the Workers Memorial, 9th & Grand Avenue in Des Moines at 11 am.
Boswell will speak at a “Lunch and Learn” event hosted by Young Professionals Connection and the Greater Des Moines Partnership, Arthur Davis Conference Room, 700 Locust St in Des Moines at 12 pm.
Actor (M*A*S*H), activist & author Mike Farrell takes his grassroots human rights advocacy to the streets. Please join Mike this Friday evening as he speaks and takes questions about his memoir, “Just Call Me Mike: A Journey to Actor and Activist.” The event will take place at 7 pm in the Prairie Lights book store, 15 S. Dubuque St. in Iowa City.
Saturday, May 31:
Ed Fallon will be at the farmer’s market in downtown Des Moines (2nd and Court Ave) in the morning.
One Iowa is hosting a volunteer workshop at 1 pm. More details here:
http://eqfed.org/oneiowa/event…
Sunday, June 1:
One Iowa is hosting a volunteer workshop at 2 pm. More details here:
http://eqfed.org/oneiowa/event…
Continue Reading...No time for a long post now, but you can read the Register’s endorsement of Fallon here.
The same editorial board that picked Hillary Clinton because of her experience and knowledge of the issues wasn’t impressed by Leonard Boswell.
Time for new energy in Congress.
The Register will endorse a candidate in the fourth district primary tomorrow.