[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
- desmoinesdem
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2015
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2015
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 12
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99

Advanced Search

Paid Advertising

Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Harkin and Loebsack support public option in health care reform

by: desmoinesdem

Sat May 02, 2009 at 18:00:00 PM CDT

Congress will begin making important decisions on health care policy very soon. The Senate Finance Committee began drafting a health care bill a few days ago.

I was glad to see two Iowans among the representatives and senators who urged colleagues this week to include a strong public option in any health care reform plan.

After the jump I have more on where Congressman Dave Loebsack and Senator Tom Harkin stand on health care, as well as the benefits of creating a public health insurance option.

UPDATE: Thanks to Populista for reminding me that all Iowa Democrats in Congress (Bruce Braley, Dave Loebsack, Leonard Boswell and Tom Harkin) have signed on to support Health Care for America Now's core principles for health care reform.

desmoinesdem :: Harkin and Loebsack support public option in health care reform
On April 28, four House caucuses sent a joint letter to President Obama and Congressional leaders to make clear that "our support for enacting legislation this year to guarantee affordable health care for all firmly hinges on the inclusion of a robust public health insurance plan like Medicare." Click here to read the press release issued by the Progressive Caucus, the Black Caucus, the Hispanic Caucus, and the Asian Pacific American Caucus. Excerpt:

"The American people are united in declaring that our health care system is broken, and that we need to fix it," said Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, Co-Chair of the CPC.  "With this letter, more than a 100 Members of Congress are sending a message that we share the public's outrage, and that we are committed to confronting this problem and developing a health care system that doesn't leave anyone out.  That's why we need to make certain that any final healthcare reform legislation includes the option of a public health insurance plan to ensure that everyone has access to high quality, affordable care."

"For too long, insurance companies have dictated the quality, quantity, and accessibility of healthcare to the American people," said Congressman Mike Honda, Chair of Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC). "A robust public health insurance plan will ensure true competition with those companies that reap egregious profits, and will present the opportunity to make deep, lasting changes in our healthcare system. A public plan will also provide a framework to eliminate racial and ethnic health disparities in some of the most underserved communities."

Representative Loebsack is the only Iowan in the Progressive Caucus, whose leaders went on record a few weeks ago saying most members of the caucus will not vote for any health care bill that does not contain a public option. Loebsack was less categorical in a statement his office sent me on April 22:

"When it comes to health care, there are many options and solutions on the table. I support a strong public option so that we can increase access to quality, affordable health care," said Congressman Loebsack. "There are too many people drawing arbitrary lines in the sand, and we all need to work together to move the conversation forward. That's why I think forums and talking to my constituents is so vital to crafting a comprehensive healthcare plan."

Loebsack's position is sensible, but I am glad to see the leaders of four caucuses signal that their members will not settle for health care reform like the program that has failed in Massachusetts.

I hope that Congressman Bruce Braley's Populist Caucus will take a similar stand. "Providing affordable, accessible, quality health care to all Americans" is one of the six main goals Braley has set for the caucus. Another Populist Caucus goal is "protecting consumers," and a public health insurance plan would give consumers more protection from the whims of private insurers. Moreover, quite a few founding Populist Caucus members also belong to the Progressive Caucus.

On the other hand, some Populist Caucus members also belong to the New Democrats caucus, which leans toward the pro-corporate position on some issues. That may make it hard for the Populist Caucus to reach consensus on health care. I am seeking comment on this from Braley's office. I would hate to see the Populist Caucus stay on the sidelines during this year's critical health care debate.

A coalition supporting a public option is taking shape in the Senate as well. On Wednesday 16 senators who caucus with Democrats, including Tom Harkin, signed a letter to Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Edward Kennedy and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus:

"As members of key committees and leaders on health care issues, we write to support a public plan option as a core component of this reform," the letter said. "There is no reason to believe that private insurers alone will meet the public purpose of ensuring coverage for all Americans at affordable prices for taxpayers."

A public plan option "would provide competition to the sometimes dysfunctional private insurance market," Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who originated the letter, said on a conference call with reporters Wednesday. [...]

Brown said that even with strong insurance market reforms designed to prevent health plans from denying coverage or charging sky-high premiums to people with preexisting conditions, a public plan remains necessary. "Insurance companies have a reputation of staying one step ahead of the sheriff," he said.

Republicans, along with healthcare and business interests, oppose the public plan option. The contend that the plan will muscle out private insurers by cutting payment rates to medical providers in order to charge lower premiums, and will lead to the federal government dominating the insurance market.

One Democratic senator, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, came out this week against any public option as part of health care reform. Jason Rosenbaum of Health Care for America Now has more on Nelson's talking points and ties to the insurance industry. Fortunately, we don't need Nelson's vote, because President Obama is committed to making health care reform part of the budget reconciliation process (so it cannot be filibustered).

I am glad to see Harkin standing with the Democrats pushing health care reform in the right direction.

Please share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

UPDATE: Moveon.org is holding an "emergency online briefing" about health care reform, featuring Howard Dean:

Emergency Online Briefing with Dr. Dean
Monday, May 4, 9pm Eastern

Hosted on MoveOn.org's web site at:

Last time Democrats tried to pass comprehensive healthcare reform, it failed. And it failed in part because the opposition was better organized and spread a bunch of lies that progressives weren't prepared to rebut.

It's up to us to make sure that doesn't happen again. We need all hands on deck, well-armed with the critical information, and motivated to keep the right from blocking real change. Dr. Dean will give us an update and inside look at the battle for real healthcare reform -- and the key actions we'll take to achieve a historic victory.

With an important Senate committee meeting on Tuesday to start shaping legislation, plus the right wing's escalating attacks, this couldn't be more urgent.

I'll be part of the emergency briefing, and I really hope you can join me at this crucial moment. Join us online Monday night at 9pm Eastern -- that's 8pm Central, 7pm Mountain, and 6pm Pacific -- this way everyone in the country can join us at the same time.


SECOND UPDATE: As I noted upthread, all Iowa Democrats in Congress (Braley, Loebsack, Boswell and Harkin) have signed on to support Health Care for America Now's core principles for health care reform. I am glad to see some Democrats reminding leadership that a public option is a high priority.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

the four House caucuses (0.00 / 0)
are signaling that they will not be easily rolled. If they don't support a health care reform bill, it won't have enough votes to pass the House (we already know the GOP will be against anything that highly regulates private insurers). They appear to be serious about a public option being a deal-breaker, and Obama appears to be serious about using the budget reconciliation process to get this through the Senate with no opportunity for a filibuster.

I am watching and waiting. I wouldn't say I am overly optimistic, but I am more optimistic than I was two months ago. Obama appears to have learned something from his poor strategy during the stimulus negotiations.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
there are drawbacks (0.00 / 0)
to using the budget reconciliation process. I do not understand all the details, but I believe that we would have to revisit the issue within four or five years if we did it through reconciliation. It would be much preferable to do it the normal way, but with 60 votes as the threshold for passing any bill in the Senate these days, I can't see any health care bill worth passing having a shot.

I agree with Durbin, but he was talking about a bill that needed 60 votes. If we can do health care reform with 51 votes, we have a better chance at a good bill.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]

Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Blog For Iowa
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowa Starting Line
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats

Powered by: SoapBlox