[Bleeding Heartland Logo]

About
Bleeding Heartland is a community blog about Iowa politics: campaigns and elections, state government, social and environmental issues. Bleeding Heartland also weighs in on presidential policies and campaigns, federal legislation and what the Iowans in Congress are up to. Join our community, post your thoughts as comments or diaries, help keep our leaders honest and hold them accountable.
Author
- desmoinesdem
Highlights
- Iowa 2012 election coverage
- Who's who in the Iowa House for 2013
- Who's who in the Iowa Senate for 2013
- Iowa wildflowers
2014 Election Coverage
- Absentee ballot numbers
- IA-Sen
- IA-Gov
- IA-01
- IA-02
- IA-03
- IA-04
- Secretary of Agriculture
- Secretary of State
- State Auditor
- Iowa Senate overview
- Iowa House overview
- Senate district 5
- Senate district 7
- Senate district 9
- Senate district 13
- Senate district 15
- Senate district 17
- Senate district 27
- Senate district 29
- Senate district 39
- Senate district 41
- Senate district 47
- Senate district 49
- House district 8
- House district 15
- House district 25
- House district 26
- House district 28
- House district 30
- House district 33 (2013)
- House district 40
- House district 51
- House district 60
- House district 63
- House district 65
- House district 68
- House district 73
- House district 82
- House district 91
- House district 92
- House district 95
- House district 99
Search




Advanced Search


Paid Advertising


Bleeding Heartland
It's what plants crave.

Who is the most clueless Iowa legislator?

by: desmoinesdem

Fri Feb 12, 2010 at 11:18:40 AM CST


A couple of years ago, I would have said State Representative Dwayne Alons (House district 4). Longtime Bleeding Heartland readers may remember Alons as the guy who asserted during a committee hearing on greenhouse gas emissions that global warming would be good for Iowa because warmer temperatures helped ancient Mayans grow taller and stronger than today's men and women. The following year, Alons remarked, "We shouldn't be as concerned, actually, about warming, especially now that we have modern refrigeration and air conditioning."

Alons sets the bar high in terms of cluelessness, but after reading this piece by Jason Hancock today, I think State Representative Jason Schultz (House district 55) could give him a run for his money. Schultz has introduced House File 2313, which stipulates,

 1  1    Section 1.  NEW SECTION.  602.1100  Judicial authority.
 1  2    1.  A judicial officer shall not use judicial precedent,
 1  3 case law, penumbras, or international law as a basis for
 1  4 rulings.  A judicial officer shall only use the Constitution
 1  5 of the United States, the Constitution of the State of Iowa,
 1  6 and the Code of Iowa as the basis for any ruling issued by such
 1  7 judicial officer.    The only source material that may be used
 1  8 for interpreting the Constitution of the United States by a
 1  9 judicial officer in this state shall be the Federalist papers
 1 10 and other writings of the founding fathers to describe the
 1 11 intent of the founding fathers, and if such source material is
 1 12 used, the full context of the source material must be used by
 1 13 the judicial officer.
 1 14    2.  This section is not reviewable by the court.
 1 15    3.  A violation of this section by a judicial officer shall
 1 16 be considered malfeasance in office and subjects the judicial
 1 17 officer to impeachment under chapter 68.

Bad ideas are not in short supply at the Iowa Capitol, but Schultz has taken things to a new level of stupidity here. No precedent and no case law, really? I have never heard of a so-called "strict constructionist" who would prohibit judges from citing previous court rulings in forming their opinions. In effect, Schultz is saying judges have to reinvent the wheel in almost every case. Yet conservative jurists usually lean toward respecting precedent.

Schultz would not allow any judge to consult historians' work on the Constitution or the Federalist Papers either, as if there can be no ambiguity about what 18th-century language was meant to convey.

Mr. desmoinesdem reminds me that even U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a critic of citing foreign law in U.S. courts, has cited international law before when interpreting a treaty. In a recent case Scalia even cited the Babylonian Talmud, which is more than 1,000 years old.

If you're wondering why Schultz wants to ban "penumbras," that term alludes to the idea that there is a right to privacy, even though the Bill of Rights does not contain the word "privacy."

Schultz's bill isn't going anywhere, and Drake University law professor Mark Kende notes that it would be unconstitutional in any event.

Like many Iowa Republicans, Schultz appears not to have a solid grasp of the judicial review concept. His support for a bill that would restore elections for Iowa Supreme Court justices indicates that he's not sold on judicial independence. But even in the context of bad Republican ideas, House File 2313 stands out. Schultz is angry that the Iowa Supreme Court cited Iowa case law in its Varnum v Brien ruling last year, so the solution must be to ban judges from considering case law.

Not only is Schultz ignorant, he also demonstrated an impressive mean streak by introducing a bill this session "that would remove protections for gay, lesbian and transgender students from an anti-bullying law passed in 2007." (More on that here.)

Iowa politics-watchers, who do you think is the most embarrassingly ill-informed member of the Iowa legislature? Make your case in this thread or e-mail me confidentially: desmoinesdem AT yahoo.com.  

desmoinesdem :: Who is the most clueless Iowa legislator?
Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tweet This!

for those of you REALLY in the know.... (0.00 / 0)
there is no contest...ask ANY legislator in private....

Staci Appel is the mose embarrassingly ill-informed member..and wins this title going away.

That question was easy.


sorry, no (0.00 / 0)
Name one bill Staci Appel has introduced or voted for that is anywhere near this level of ignorance (judges shouldn't use case law).

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
sorry........ (0.00 / 0)
your question didn't have limitations as to "legislation introduced".

Rep. Ralph Watts (4.00 / 1)
at least deserves a special mention.  The guy is an electrical engineer by training and has worked for a utility.  But when there were hearings on energy efficiency legislation a couple of years ago, the man did not even appear to understand the very basics of how energy savings are calculated over the life of an energy improvement.  If the man really is that clueless, he should be barred from practicing any kind of engineering in Iowa.  Of course, I suspect his cluelessness was a pure ideology-driven distraction tactic that can be expected from a person who was distributing kooky climate change denial books to his fellow legislators.

he would certainly be in the running (0.00 / 0)
As it happens, Watts offered an amendment in the Iowa House today to eliminate incentives for wind energy in Iowa. It failed 97-1.

He also showed up at a private home in his district where the owners had installed solar panels and advocated for clean coal.  

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Must be something in the air (0.00 / 0)
Schultz is from Schleswig which is only about 10 miles from Kiron.  Steve King is the Kook from Kiron.  This should help confirm Schultz as the most clueless.

they sure know how to pick them! (0.00 / 0)
Wow.

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Kent Sorenson (0.00 / 0)
Perhaps too obvious of a choice, but true nonetheless.  I spoke with him Wednesday (as well as Sen. Appel, who was gracious and welcoming and seemed intelligent) for One Iowa's lobby day.  I will grant that he was courteous and willing to speak to us.  However, he kept saying that he was "more of a Libertarian" and that's why he opposes marriage equality.  Does he know what Libertarian means?  Marriage equality is at its core a libertarian issue more than a Democratic one.  More than this example, I just got an overwhelming feeling of "this guy is a moron".  His logic is circular and he is flat wrong in his claim of how the Judicial branch works.  Needless to say, I will be working for and contributing to Sen. Appel.

yes, he is a contender too (0.00 / 0)
It's fitting that Sorenson, Schultz and Alons all introduced the bill on electing Supreme Court justices.  

Invite other Iowa political junkies to join us at Bleeding Heartland.

[ Parent ]
Lenny Boswell.. (0.00 / 0)
Since he thought he could take me outside and kick my ass what with him being 70 years of age or so.  

No wait, you said STATE legislators.  

Sorry, none of them have offered to "take it oustide" with me so they could attempt to kick my ass.  

Thus far.

Well, except for that one time I tossed some rotten stinky potatoes over the fence into Ed Fallon's compost heap.  

hee-hee Now that was funny!


Leonard threatened you? (0.00 / 0)
Please do share and I'm not trying to drub up an old story or start a food fight about Boswell.  

[ Parent ]
At a meeting with anti-war activists (0.00 / 0)
and others in his DM office several years ago...  Leonard was waxing poetic about his place on an intelligence subcommittee.  I suggested that it takes a great deal of moral courage to stand up to the powers that be. At that point he got red in the face and basically went off on a rant about how dare I challenge his courage, etc...

After the meeting ended, he suggested in a personal aside that maybe we should "step out back" to settle the issue of whether or not he has any courage.

That's the bare facts.  


[ Parent ]
LOL (0.00 / 0)
I think Leonard's a good dude, he shouldn't stress himself out like that.  

I THOUGHT he was... (0.00 / 0)
but geesh. Get a freakin' grip, dude.  

Ok, so a bit of a correction and addendum. To make sure I recalled the events clearly, spoke to a friend who was there that day.  There was an apology made by his staff to another person who tangled with him at the time.  For the record, I personally never got an apology for his behavior.

 


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Iowa Liberal Blogs
- Ames Progressive
- Blog For Iowa
- Essential Estrogen
- Iowa .Gif-t Shop
- Iowa Independent (archive)
- Iowa Policy Points
- Iowans for a Future That Doesn't Suck
- John Deeth
Iowa Conservative Blogs
- Hawkeye GOP
- The Bean Walker
- Caffeinated Thoughts
- The Conservative Reader: Iowa
- The Iowa Republican
Journalists' blogs and research
- 24-Hour Dorman
- Cedar Rapids Gazette government page
- Iowa Fiscal Partnership
- Iowa Policy Project
- Iowa Politics Insider
- Iowa Watchdog.org
- On Brief: Iowa's Appellate Blog
- On the Campaign Trail with Ed Tibbetts
- Newton Independent (Peter Hussmann)
- Politically Speaking
- Price of Politics, etc.
- O.Kay Henderson at Radio Iowa
Iowa Democrats
- Tom Harkin (U.S. Senator)
- Bruce Braley (IA-01)
- Dave Loebsack (IA-02)
- Iowa Democratic Party
- Iowa House Democrats
- Iowa Senate Democrats
Statistics


 
Powered by: SoapBlox