Latham ducking debates with Greenwald

Last week Becky Greenwald challenged Representative Tom Latham to five debates, including four this month when he is in Iowa for the summer recess.

The Iowa Farmers Union invited both candidates to debate at its annual conference in Marshalltown. Although Latham has already agreed to attend that event on August 23, he is refusing to debate Greenwald there. A statement from the Greenwald campaign calling on Latham to reconsider is after the jump.

I’m with former Congressman Berkley Bedell, who represented Iowa’s sixth district from 1975 to 1987. He wrote recently in the Sioux City Journal, “I never gave it a second thought as to whether or not I would debate in elections. As leader of the team, of course I debated any opponent.”

Bedell was commenting on Steve King’s refusal to debate his challenger, Rob Hubler, but his point applies to Latham as well.

This month would be a good time for an activist to rent a chicken suit and show up at Latham’s public events around the fourth district.

For Immediate Release                                                                  

August 11, 2008                                                                                              

Contact: Erin Seidler

515-537-4465

Latham Refuses to Debate Greenwald on August Recess

Greenwald Campaign Calls on Latham to Debate Before Returning to Washington

Waukee, IA – Tom Latham refused this week to debate Becky Greenwald while he is home on the August recess. The Greenwald campaign accepted a debate with Latham at the Iowa Farmer’s Union Convention, an event that Latham is attending. Latham refused to debate.

“We are disappointed that Tom Latham refused to debate Becky Greenwald at the Iowa Farmer’s Union Convention. We tried to work with his schedule and find a venue for a debate at an event Latham would already be attending,” said Campaign Manager Robert Brennan. “Iowans deserve to hear from Tom Latham why after 14 years in Congress, he has done nothing to address the energy crisis, lack of care for our veterans and the high cost of healthcare.”

Last week, the Greenwald campaign sent a letter to the Latham campaign asking to hold four debates over the August recess. The Latham campaign refused the debates saying their schedule was full. The Iowa Farmers Union tried to accommodate with his schedule and arrange for a debate at their convention in Marshalltown, IA on Saturday August 23rd, an event that Latham will be attending. The Latham campaign refused to debate.

“There are serious issues facing Iowans and Americans, and we need to hear from both candidates sooner rather than later,” Brennan continued. “We call on Latham to reconsider and debate Becky Greenwald.”

##

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Some Historical Perspective Needed Here

    As you know, I’m not a huge fan of Tom Latham but I feel the need to stick up for him here – every time he has run for Congress – he has debated his opponent.  Everytime.

    Also, DesMoinesDem – you have complete disregard for my man – Independent candidate William Meyers.  Don’t you think any debate in the 4th district should include Mr. Meyers?  Where is your outrage over this?  Did the Greenwald campaign invite Mr. Meyers when they also invited Mr. Latham?

    In addition, wasn’t this debate challenge just issued a few days ago?  I’m no spring chicken myself (no pun intended) but I know that you have to give ample time notice that you want to have events or debates because I am sure people like Latham and Greenwald aren’t just sitting around waiting for an event to pop up – they are out there campaigning and probably have busy schedules. I know William does.

    Also, four debates in August?  DesMoinesDem – we all know people don’t pay attention to the campaigns much until after Labor Day.  That’s why William is just waiting to spring into action and take this thing.    

    Chicken suit?  Really? I would assume you’ll be advocating that Braley debate Hartsuch and that Loebsack will debate Miller Meeks and that Boswell will debate Schmett.  

    We cannot be so blinded by our partisanship – thats why I support William Meyers – that we fail to recognize our own hypocrisy.

    DesMoinesDem – I think you run a respectable blog but please use some historical perspective next time.  

    I am sure Latham will debate eventually.  I know that I cannot wait for the Latham/Meyers/Greenwald debate – I am sure we can all write about it on this blog after it happens.

    • Latham already agreed to go to the IFU conference

      so debating Greenwald there would not interfere with his schedule.

      And no, I don’t think third-party candidates should be included in the debates. Otherwise you would quickly get a circus with lots of parties nominating candidates for Congress to get up on the stage for the debates.

      Actually, I do think that Braley, Loebsack and Boswell should debate their Republican opponents.

  • I'm all for letting the third parties in...

    On one condition…third parties must show that they’re serious. All they would have to do is show they could net 5% of the vote, either by showing last election’s results or a reputable poll. 5%! That’s not so much, and it separates reputable third party candidates (like Ralph Nader, Ross Perot or, on the local level–Mr. Meyers) from the not so reputable (whoever the Socialist Workers and Dichead parties are running this year).

    5% is too much? Fine, 2.5% then. That still keeps the looney tunes out of the debates.  

  • I also see you targeting the Vilsacks and the Appels

    Who are not in a competitive election. And also targeting the DLC. Kinda leaves me scratching my head as to why a Republican would target these people on a site called “Bleeding Heartland”… but than I remembered William Meyers last post on this site, which was (stupidly enough) under his own name

    [hidden comment] The Liar Cost Me the Nomination (0.00 / 5)

    Greenwald will get he ass kick by Latham and you can thank the idiot Vilsaks for that.

    Check it out for yourself in the hidden comments section, along with many other unbecoming comments.

Comments