Thank heaven for paper ballots

The recount to determine the winner of Minnesota's Senate race has been going on for six weeks, with a court challenge likely if Al Franken, who leads narrowly, is declared the winner. (WineRev's diaries tell you everything you need to know about what's going on in that race.)

Imagine how much more contentious this process would be if Minnesota did not use paper ballots in every county. Less than one one-hundredth of a percent of the vote separates Franken from Republican incumbent Norm Coleman. If touchscreen voting machines had been involved in any way, large numbers of people would surely believe the election had been rigged in favor of whoever came out ahead.

Mark Halvorson of Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota published this piece on what has worked well during the Minnesota recount, and how the system could still be improved.

Iowa had more state legislative races decided by less than 1 percent of the vote this year than in any other election I can remember. Fortunately, the state legislature heeded Secretary of State Mike Mauro's call to require optical scanner machines with paper ballots in every county, and Governor Chet Culver signed that bill into law this spring. Otherwise the legitimacy of these extremely close races could have been questioned.

If you run into Mauro, thank him for his efforts to improve Iowa's voting system, and encourage him to ask the legislature to take the next step toward "verified voting" (mandatory manual audits of voter-verified paper records). That would allay fears about malfunctions or tampering with the optical scanners as they count the votes.

As this map at VerifiedVoting.org shows, Minnesota is one of 18 states that has mandatory manual audits of voter-verified paper records. Iowa is one of 13 states that require paper ballots, but without mandatory audits to make sure the scanners are producing accurate counts.

Keep your eye on the Iowa Voters blog for updates on election integrity news and activism in Iowa.

  • just a few comments on close votes

    Here are some final votes (according to Iowa SOS website) that I tabulated, some are a little different than your previous entry and there are a few that were close that were not mentioned.

    District 1 Whithead (D) / Taylor (R) 55 votes (0.43%)

    District 59 Sullivan (D) / Hagenow (R) 93 votes (0.54%)

    District 21 Burt (D) / Wiencek (R) 219 votes (1.6%)

    District 8 Mertz (D) / Richards (R)  43 votes (0.29%)

    None of these were mentioned but I felt were worth noting (even though two did not result in Democrats' victories, my apologies!)

    District 37 Staed (D) / Schulte (R)  13 votes (0.07%)

    District 74 Davitt (D) / Sorenson (R) 163 votes (0.93%)

    District 89 Marek (D) / Klein (R) 157 votes (1.01%)

Login or Join to comment and post.