Political journalists, don't feed into Steve King's games

Come on, Dave Price and Bret Hayworth, you know Steve King isn’t running for president in 2012. When journalists ask him whether he might seek the presidency, King is happy to play the game of not saying no directly, because not ruling out a presidential bid generates buzz and boosts his national profile. But he won’t give up a safe seat in Congress, which happens to provide his son with a full-time job as well, in pursuit of the Republican presidential nomination.

Hayworth observed today,

Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo, who King has noted is essentially his twin, ran for president in 2008. Why shouldn’t Steve King?

Tancredo’s presidential bid didn’t even last until the Iowa caucuses. He saw the writing on the wall and dropped out in December 2007. He then endorsed one of the leading candidates, Mitt Romney, while King went with the laughable Fred Thompson (after flirting with Romney).

A short-lived presidential campaign by King wouldn’t merely be a waste of time like Tancredo’s was. It would give other contenders another reason to skip Iowa, the way Democratic candidates bypassed the 1992 caucuses because Tom Harkin ran for president.

King’s not going to deprive Iowa Republicans of a major role in selecting the 2012 nominee. Presidential campaigns bring lots of money to Iowa cities, and so do media organizations in the runup to the caucuses. Presidential candidates also give money to the Republican Party of Iowa and its statehouse candidates. King will enjoy having several candidates compete for his endorsement.

There are plenty of other good questions journalists could ask King. For instance, why does he keep claiming the House health care reform bill would fund abortions? The fact is, the House bill already contains language similar to the Hyde amendment (banning public funds for abortions) and will probably reduce private insurance coverage for abortions as well.

  • Sorry, I disagree

    With your premise that journalists shouldn’t ask, let alone encourage, Steve King to run for prez.

    If we can just keep planting this thought in his pointed little head, maybe, just maybe…

    I would love nothing better than to see a Palin/King 2012 ticket.

  • Hey desmoines dem

    I’ve read about many others who dislike (if not despise) Iowa’s status as the first primary/caucus state, many of them on such sites as Kos.

    Do you agree with them, or do you think it’s best to keep Iowa first?

    • I have problems with the caucus system

      as it currently operates in Iowa and other states. I feel that the barriers to participation are too great, and primaries are a better way to select presidential candidates.

      However, I do think the nominating process should start in smaller states with cheaper media.

      Obviously, I enjoy having all the presidential candidates visit here.

      A lot of the Kossacks are hypocrites. They hated the Iowa caucuses after Kerry lost to Bush, but then they discovered religion about caucuses because they loved Obama and hated Hillary.

    • here are a couple of links

      to my previous posts about the caucus system:

      Reform the caucus system

      Caucus system still needs serious reform

      Obviously, this is not a popular view among Iowa Democrats.

Login or Join to comment and post.