Des Moines City Council: Skip Moore's and Chris Diebel's case to voters

I can’t remember a local race that’s been more divisive for central Iowa Democrats than the Des Moines at-large City Council contest between Skip Moore and Chris Diebel. (That includes Ed Fallon’s challenge to Leonard Boswell in the 2008 Democratic primary to represent IA-03. In that race, the whole local establishment was on Boswell’s side.) I’ve been meaning to post an update on the city council race for the past week, but frankly, I wanted to avoid sparking a flamewar like some of the Facebook threads I’ve seen.

The early returns tonight indicate a big victory for Moore.

After the jump I’ve posted examples of positive and negative messages from the Diebel and Moore campaigns, along with one of the direct-mail pieces the National Association of Realtors Fund sent to Des Moines residents. The realtors’ group appears to be polling voters to gauge whether their mailing and radio ads have helped Diebel. During the last couple of days, several of my acquaintances in Des Moines have received telephone polls that asked them why they were supporting the candidate of their choice, and whether Diebel’s mail or the realtors’ mail affected their vote.  

Let’s start with Diebel’s central argument against Moore, the talking point that has become pivotal in the campaign. Multiple direct-mail pieces contained similar language.

Diebel negative 2 photo Diebelnegative2_zpseb979fc4.jpg

Diebel negative 1 photo diebelneg1_zps71a6c2dd.jpg

Typically, a challenger needs to do at least some negative campaigning to make a case for replacing the incumbent. However, I don’t buy this argument against Skip Moore. He was not on the city council when the illegal franchise fee was levied. He joined the council well into the appeal process, which happened to be during the worst recession in 60 years. The city of Des Moines was already cutting staff and services in 2010 and 2011. I do not share Diebel’s view that it would have been more prudent to make millions of dollars in additional cuts at that time, just in case the city lost its appeals.

I suspect that very few Diebel voters have made up their minds based on the franchise fee issue. All over the west side of Des Moines I see yards with signs for both Diebel and Chris Hensley, who has served on the council for two decades. Why not throw her out too if this franchise fee business is proof of poor leadership?

The Des Moines Register’s editorial board endorsed Diebel about a week ago but chastised him for his mail against Moore. Diebel responded with this letter to the editor (excerpt):

My opponent does not have a track record of leadership, and the franchise fee offers one example.

Nowhere in our mail pieces did we ever say Skip Moore created this problem. We simply point out he’s had four years to do something about it. Despite multiple losing court battles, our city did not put any money away to pay the judgment. At the first sign of trouble, I would have suggested that we set aside funds until we confirmed whether the revenue in question was legally obtained.

Instead, we now have to decide how we will pay back $40+ million – approximately $7 million of which will go to attorney fees. This is not only unfortunate, but it was avoidable.

Skip Moore has had the opportunity to speak up on this issue every year he has been in office and he did not. Every time he voted to approve a city budget, he could have suggested we put money in a rainy-day fund just in case the city lost its court case. He failed to act or even raise the question about paying the $40 million.

Voters are smart enough to know that we should have been saving for the very realistic chance that we’d have to return these fees.

Reasonable minds can differ, but the Des Moines Register’s editorial board wasn’t buying this explanation. On Saturday morning, November 2, they withdrew their endorsement of Diebel, an unprecedented move. The editors explained,

We endorsed Chris Diebel for council at-large over incumbent Skip Moore and challenger Margaret Trowe. Earlier that week, however, voters had begun receiving mailers from the Diebel campaign attacking Moore for his failure to advocate that the city set aside money to pay for a court-ordered refund of gas and electric utility franchise fees. The mailer also said Moore “ignored orders to pay back illegal fees.”

These attacks are unfair and inaccurate. […]

In an editorial Tuesday, we urged Diebel to withdraw his attacks on Moore. Instead, he has doubled down.

In a letter to the editor published Thursday, Diebel asserted, “Nowhere in our mail pieces did we ever say Skip Moore created this problem.” That was the clear implication of the first two mailers, however, and a third mailer flatly says, “Tell Skip Moore you don’t want more fees to pay for his $40 million mistake.”

The city’s illegal collection of utility franchise fees for five years was a mistake, but it was not Skip Moore’s mistake. […]

Diebel’s third mailer seriously undermines voter support for the city’s best option for rectifying the franchise fee mistake.[…]

For these reasons, we can no longer support Chris Diebel for the Des Moines City Council. Withdrawing an endorsement after the fact is unusual for the Register, but given Diebel’s reckless and inaccurate campaign ads, we have no choice.

Adding to the awkwardness, a direct-mail piece hit voters’ mailboxes on Monday touting the Register’s endorsement of Diebel. (No doubt that piece was produced and sent to the printer before the newspaper changed its mind.) Several of my friends who support Diebel believe his campaign messaging about the franchise fee will cost him the election.

In my opinion, Diebel’s positive mail was more effective. Here’s one example:

Diebel neighborhoods 1 photo Diebelneighborhoods1_zps93e3fecd.jpg

Diebel neighborhoods 2 photo Diebelneighborhoods2_zps1a348ecc.jpg

Speaking of neighborhoods, I agree 100 percent with Diebel that Rice Field in Beaverdale should be preserved as green space while the city explores options for putting badly-needed new senior housing along nearby Franklin Avenue, close to the public library and the Northwest Community Center.

Bleeding Heartland already covered the National Association of Realtors Fund’s pro-Diebel radio ads, which made false claims about “red tape” in local home sales. In addition, the realtors paid for direct mail on Diebel’s behalf. This piece made a positive (and in my view more effective) case for electing him:

Diebel realtors photo diebelrealtor1_zpsb3b95aa3.jpg

Diebel realtors 2 photo diebelrealtor2_zps8f13df4b.jpg

Many prominent Des Moines residents who have endorsed Diebel (including former Attorney General Bonnie Campbell and State Senator Matt McCoy) have cited his community involvement and business acumen.

Here’s an example of Skip Moore’s positive campaign communications. One of my friends was swayed partly by his record promoting gender equity on city boards and commissions.

Skip Moore 1 photo Moore2_zps806c9eec.jpg

Skip Moore 2 photo Moore3_zpsbe5db56b.jpg

This fundraising letter from Moore’s campaign hints at the incumbent’s main dig against Diebel: he’s less experienced and is the candidate of big money.

Skip Moore fundraising photo Moore1_zps46814432.jpg

  • At-Large Race

    After the franchise fee issue became front and center, Skip Moore got to sit back and seemingly take the high road and let his supporters and trolls (two of his primary commenters had a combined total of 21 Facebook friends) attack Diebel personally and say what Skip was rumored to be saying privately to his friends and close supporters. People were suggesting that Chris was hiding things personally and Diebel’s sexuality was also brought into various comments. First off, that’s inappropriate and sickening. Second, as a former National LGBT co-chair for Obama’s campaign, there’s nothing that he was hiding.

    Of course people were asking “why not go after Hensley as well?” Well, it was rumored that Diebel and Hensley were friends, but why should Diebel have to mention her? He wasn’t running against her. Suggesting that Diebel should go after all the council members wouldn’t really make him too welcomed on the council should he have been elected.

    I don’t have any negative things to say about the job Skip Moore has done because he hasn’t done anything and he basically admitted that to me when I asked him what projects he had led in the past 4 years to help us receive some of our accolades. I appreciate that he calls people back promptly and is easy to get a hold of. That really sits well with people and I heard that quite a bit.

    It is unfortunate that two good Dems had to go at it because I think some lines were drawn there and I hate seeing that from a broader view.

    • there were whispering campaigns on both sides

      I was told and many of my friends were told privately that Skip was too hotheaded, would scream at people, in other words lacked the temperament to be a good city council member.

      Many people said the same to me, Diebel’s not running against Hensley, why should he say anything about Hensley? Which I understand, but on the other hand when you see hundreds of yards on the west side with Diebel and Hensley signs, it’s clear that “franchise fee” was just a smokescreen rather than a genuine reason for people not to re-elect Moore. Anyway, I disagreed with the point of the message: that it would have been more responsible for Moore to have the city of Des Moines to make further cuts during the recession to set aside $8-10 million a year.

      Where you say, “It is unfortunate that two good Dems had to go at it,” I would say, “It is unfortunate a good Dem like Chris Diebel picked the wrong race to run.” I agree with you that it was a highly divisive race and will leave hard feelings on both sides.

You need to signin or signup to post a comment.