The ACLU of Iowa filed suit on December 16 on behalf of three reporters and three media organizations over Governor Kim Reynolds' long-standing failure to comply with Iowa's open records law. The lawsuit cites five unfulfilled requests submitted by me, two submitted by Clark Kauffman of Iowa Capital Dispatch, and one submitted by Randy Evans of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council.
I've been seeking some of those records for more than a year. My oldest outstanding request, for video messages the governor may have recorded for meatpacking plant employees during the early weeks of the pandemic, dates to April 2020. Although Reynolds told members of the Iowa Capitol Press Association in January 2021 that she would commit to having her staff respond to open records requests "in a timely manner," her office continues to stonewall.
I enclose below the full statement released by the ACLU of Iowa, with comments from the ACLU's legal director Rita Bettis Austen, Iowa Capital Dispatch editor-in-chief Kathie Obradovich, Evans, and me. I will add the petition filed in Polk County District Court when that document is available. UPDATE: Here is the petition.
Iowa Code Chapter 22 guarantees the "right to examine and copy a public record and to publish or otherwise disseminate a public record or the information contained in a public record." The lawsuit states, "There are no exemptions under Chapter 22 that would apply to the open records requested, and Defendants have never alleged in response to the open records requests that any exemptions apply."
As Bettis Austen noted, "Our clients showed remarkable patience and understanding with the Governor’s Office in light of the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the Governor’s Office continued to unreasonably flout the law, which requires that records be provided in a reasonable period of time. But we’re long past the point when a delay might be considered reasonable."
Evans commented that for four decades, "a long string of governors regularly responded to the requests for public information made by journalists and ordinary citizens." But Reynolds "has not responded with the same transparency. She has acted as if the public records law does not apply to her. She has acted as if there is an asterisk in this law that says the Governor is excused from having to comply with its requirements if it is inconvenient or might prove to be embarrassing."
The named defendants are Reynolds, her senior legal counsel Michael Boal, her former communications director Pat Garrett, her current communications director Alex Murphy, and the Office of the Governor of the State of Iowa.
Utah-based attorney Suzette Rasmussen filed two lawsuits against Reynolds and Boal in August over their failure to provide records Rasmussen had requested five months earlier, related to Iowa's COVID-19 testing program.
The state has sought to dismiss those lawsuits, arguing that the cases are moot, since the governor's office sent documents to Rasmussen after she sued. The plaintiff is still pursuing the matter, on the grounds that the lengthy delay amounts to noncompliance with Chapter 22.
In turn, attorneys for the state have asserted that the governor cannot be sued for failing to provide records in a timely manner, because that's "a nonjusticiable political question," and the details needed to defend against a timeliness claim "would infringe on the Governor's executive privilege."
The ACLU of Iowa does not charge clients for attorney's fees. So readers who want to support this legal effort don't need to donate to Bleeding Heartland. Instead, they can give to either the ACLU Foundation of Iowa or to the Iowa Freedom of Information Council. Since both organizations are 501(c)3 nonprofits, donations will be tax deductible.
UPDATE: Ryan Foley reported for the Associated Press on December 17,
Reynolds’ spokesman Alex Murphy sent an email to reporters Friday saying the coronavirus pandemic created increased records requests and they are still being processed.
“Due to this enhanced volume, we have revisited our open records process and have made changes to help efficiently complete requests,” he said.
Foley tweeted on December 16, "AP is not a party to the lawsuit but its requests have also been ignored in violation of the law, some for more than a year. They include a request for pending and fulfilled open records requests to see the size of the office’s backlog and who else was being stonewalled."
LATER UPDATE: The ACLU filed a number of exhibits supporting the petition.
Exhibit A is the chain of (mostly unanswered) emails relating to the request I submitted on April 27, 2020.
Exhibit B is the chain of emails relating to my request of July 3, 2020.
Exhibit C is the chain of emails relating to my request of July 17, 2020.
Exhibit D is the chain of emails relating to my request of June 1, 2021.
Exhibit E is the chain of emails relating to my request of June 16, 2021.
Exhibit F is the chain of emails relating to Clark Kauffman's request of April 8, 2021.
Exhibit G is the chain of emails relating to Clark Kauffman's request of May 10, 2021.
Exhibit H is a series of text messages between Clark Kauffman and Alex Murphy.
Exhibit I is the records request Randy Evans submitted on August 10, 2021.
Exhibit J is an email Randy Evans received on August 20, 2021.
Exhibit K is an email Randy Evans sent on August 27, 2021.
Kathie Obradovich made another important point in her latest column for Iowa Capital Dispatch: "The lawsuit doesn’t ask for any damages, just legal fees that would cover the costs for ACLU of Iowa to represent us and other plaintiffs in the case." None of the plaintiffs are doing this for money.
Full text of December 16 news release:
Journalists File Lawsuit to Obtain COVID-19-Related and Other Public Records from Iowa Governor's Office
Des Moines, Iowa - Today the ACLU of Iowa filed a lawsuit on behalf of three reporters and three media and open government organizations to compel the Iowa Governor's Office to release public records regarding COVID-19 and other public records. The media organizations have been trying to get the records for the last year and a half.
The lawsuit details multiple instances in which the Governor's office has violated Iowa law. It seeks an order finding that the Governor’s Office violated Iowa open records law, compelling the Governor's office to turn over the requested records to the news organizations, and an order for the Governor's office to comply with future requests in a timely manner.
All three have filed repeated requests for information, but received either no response or the Governor’s office acknowledged the request but then failed to provide the records—even after numerous renewed requests and inquiries into the status of the Governor’s response to the records.
ACLU of Iowa Legal Director Rita Bettis Austen said, "The ability of journalists like our clients to access public records is one of the essential safeguards of our democracy. The open record law ensures the public’s access to open records in order to assure transparency and the public accountability of our elected officials to the people they represent."
"However, unfortunately, the Governor’s office’s handling of public records requests since the beginning of the pandemic has demonstrated a persistent pattern of just ignoring them. The Governor is not exempt from the law," Bettis Austen said.
"The public’s need for robust reporting about our government is greater than ever. We count on reporters every day to shine a light on public officials. We are proud to represent our clients in their efforts to enforce their right to public records, so that in turn, they can do their job of informing the public," Bettis Austen said.
The lawsuit has six official plaintiffs, three individuals and the three media organizations they are associated with.
1) Laura Belin and Bleeding Heartland, an independent news organization that covers state government
2) Randy Evans and the Iowa Freedom of Information Council, a media membership organization
3) Clark Kauffman, a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize for Investigative Reporting, and the Iowa Capital Dispatch, an independent, not-for-profit statewide news organization, which he currently works for.
All have filed repeated requests for public records with the Governor's Office starting as early as April 2020 and the delays have stretched into months in some cases, and well over a year in others.
Laura Belin and Bleeding Heartland
Repeated requests for information from Bleeding Heartland to the Governor's office, which have been ignored, include:
- Video messages the governor may have recorded for meatpacking plant employees during the early weeks of the pandemic
- Communications asking the governor to sign or veto certain legislation
- Records of donations of the use of Terrace Hill for events for private organizations
Laura Belin, Bleeding Heartland's publisher and primary reporter, said, "I purposely kept my requests very specific so that they would not take a lot of time to compile."
But Bleeding Heartland still has not received any of the materials requested.
"By stonewalling my records requests for over a year, the Governor's office has concealed information about matters of clear public interest," said Belin.
"Iowans have a right to know the information included in these requests. They deserve to know the content of any videos featuring our Governor that were played in meatpacking plants, where the worst outbreaks occurred during the early weeks of the pandemic. They have a right to know who urged the Governor to sign or veto important legislation. And they have a right to know which organizations were given favorable treatment and allowed to auction off time with the governor at her official residence, and if taxpayers footed the costs associated with those Terrace Hill events."
"Iowa's open records law was written expressly so that politicians and others couldn't do exactly this kind of stonewalling. Gov. Reynolds is not above the law," Belin said.
Randy Evans and Iowa Freedom of Information Council (FOIC)
The FOIC is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization of newspapers, radio and television stations, media associations, educators, publishers, broadcasters, and others interested in open government and First Amendment rights. In August 2021, it requested specific records regarding Iowa State Patrol employees being deployed, using Iowa taxpayers' money, to assist Texas with border security in Summer 2021.
The Governor's office has never supplied these records.
Randy Evans, executive director of the Iowa FOIC and long-time award-winning Iowa journalist, said that Gov. Reynold's refusal to produce requested public documents is a new development among Iowa governor's offices.
"Iowa’s public records law has been on the books for 40 years. In that time, a long string of governors regularly responded to the requests for public information made by journalists and ordinary citizens," Evans said.
"Unlike her predecessors, however, Governor Reynolds has not responded with the same transparency. She has acted as if the public records law does not apply to her. She has acted as if there is an asterisk in this law that says the Governor is excused from having to comply with its requirements if it is inconvenient or might prove to be embarrassing," Evans said.
"The Governor’s refusal for the past year and a half to act on requests from numerous people is very troubling. She and her staff have deprived the citizens of Iowa of records and information they are entitled to evaluate her work as Iowa's chief executive," he said.
"The Office of the Governor must comply with the public records law — whether she likes that or not, and regardless of whether she would prefer to avoid the public scrutiny that releasing these records might bring about," Evans said.
Clark Kauffman and The Iowa Capital Dispatch
Iowa Capital Dispatch is a not-for-profit news organization dedicated to nonpartisan, unbiased coverage of state government. It also has had difficulty getting requested information from the Governor's office:
- Information regarding the Governor auctioning off of a dinner with her at Terrace Hill to benefit the Des Moines Christian school.
- Communications regarding the former director of the Iowa Veterans Home, who was terminated after allegedly receiving salary overpayments. The facts regarding the basis for his termination are disputed. In that case, a few but not all of the records requested were provided.
Kathie Obradovich, Iowa Capital Dispatch editor-in-chief, says, "We have joined this petition because we believe Iowans are entitled to accurate, in-depth information about the actions and functions of their state government. By failing to comply with the Iowa Open Meetings and Records Act, the governor’s office has deprived Iowans of information in the public interest related to how the governor is managing state government and using the resources of the state. The governor’s office sets the example for other state agencies, several of which have also failed to comply with the state open records law. We need to change this culture of state government that prefers to hide rather than share public documents and operate in secrecy rather than with transparency."
Systemic Lack of Response from Governor's Office
All of the journalists and media organization plaintiffs said they recognize that especially in the early stages of the pandemic, the Governor's office faced many challenges, and that as a result, they were patient about the original delays, giving the Governor’s Office multiple opportunities to provide the records over the last 18 months.
But as the months stretched on, it became clear that the Governor's office was simply ignoring multiple open records requests by multiple news organizations.
According to Bettis Austen, "Our clients showed remarkable patience and understanding with the Governor’s Office in light of the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Unfortunately, the Governor’s Office continued to unreasonably flout the law, which requires that records be provided in a reasonable period of time. But we’re long past the point when a delay might be considered reasonable. At this point, the delays are beyond the pale. Our clients would have much preferred the Governor’s Office follow the law than have to take this legal action just to be able to get the information they need to do their job to cover matters of high public interest in these demanding times."
The Governor has been questioned by other journalists about her and her office's noncompliance with open records laws and ignoring or not responding to reporters' requests for information.
During a January 7 online forum, Iowa Capital Press Association president Erin Murphy asked Gov. Reynolds about her office's ongoing noncompliance with open record laws and if she would instruct her staff to respond to open record requests as soon as possible. Gov. Reynolds responded by saying "...I have no issue with making that commitment."
Iowa Open Records Law
Iowa's Open Records Law is designed to guarantee that the public has access to the public records of government bodies at all levels–with no exception for the Governor’s Office. Records should be disclosed under the law unless they fit specific exceptions for confidential records. The law does not allow public officials to delay access to records for an unreasonable amount of time.
If not now, when?
Just read about the suit at sfgate.com. I forsee a resounding victory for you, journalism and (finally) some governmental accountability.
Thinking that you should be granted journalist credentials and "working space" at the state capital is another of life's absurdities. As your meddling law suits. That being said; we would love to see your email.
That was fast!
This evening the Governors mouthpiece made a very vague non-announcement about processing reporters requests for information. It's clear they're sensitive to the public perception of this situation. What's also clear that KR will continue to 'hide the ball' until the refs make her give it up. Good luck and good lawyering.
spurred me to see if Kim had ever spawned a failson. Nope. So that's a bit of personal learnin' that will do for this otherwise unambitious day.
Plus, before I go, now Laura gets read one more thank you:
Thank you, Laura.
This is important
This is pretty straightforward and simple stuff. All you have to do is ask yourself why is this public information being withheld? Then remember this is why the First Amendment exists. King George would also have withheld these records.
It needed to be done...
...so thank you for doing it.