Threats to clean water affect all Iowans

Julie Stauch is a Democratic candidate for governor. She lives in West Des Moines. This column first appeared in the Cedar Rapids Gazette.

In June, after declaring my campaign for the Democratic nomination for governor, I started traveling the state to hold Interview sessions in fifteen Community College districts. The goal is to understand ground level concerns of Iowans through free-flowing conversations. I want to determine what problems most Iowans are concerned about. Iowa’s next governor will need to address those problems.

While most of the participants have been Democrats, there have also been Republicans and no-party voters in the mix. These have been substantive conversations where individual Iowans share what they see as the biggest challenges facing their area and the state and what a successful Iowa would look like. I also answer their questions about my point of view on a variety of issues.

My core reason for running for governor is to solve problems Iowans need solved.

Problem solving requires defining the problem. Then we dig into what is the root cause, or sometimes causes. From there we can define solutions that will hold up over time.

The need for clean water has come up in every location. That’s hardly surprising given the pollution in so many of Iowa lakes and rivers, as well as beaches across the state closed due to E. coli in the water and toxic algae blooms.

When it comes to the problem of turning polluted water into clean water, the answer is very different in different places. For example, when my family lived in Ohio, it was excess pollution from Pittsburgh Plate Glass in Barberton, very near to where my dad worked for Yoder Brothers. The smell was vile and burned the nostrils. All animal and plant life along the river was dead.

In Iowa our water is polluted with excess manure and commercial fertilizer spread on fields is washed through and over the soil to nearby rivers and streams. Nutrient pollution is the result, with nitrate in our drinking water accompanied by phosphorus in our lakes, degrading our quality of life. Our streams are largely unprotected by conservation efforts. Tile drainage systems that underlie many of our farm fields help nitrate pollute our streams.

Water treatment facilities are required to clean the water before it is usable for human consumption. In an oversimplified description, clean water is used to dilute polluted water to a point that it is usable, or the nitrate requires removal using treatment processes. Currently there is a shortage of clean water to use, which has required restrictions on usage and, in some places, outright bans of use for the safety of the people living in those areas. Also, as of August 1, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources did not recommend swimming at fifteen beaches across the state due to E. coli bacteria in the water.

How did we get here? In 2010, Iowans passed a constitutional amendment creating the Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Trust Fund. It was supposed to fund water quality improvements for a variety of uses, ranging from recreation to drinking water supply. The fund would be filled by an increase in the state sales tax.

But Governor Terry Branstad and later Governor Kim Reynolds each chose to ignore the will of the people by not filling the fund. Instead, they focused on sustaining weak regulations and opposed any effort to create measurable standards. Deregulation is a thread that ties together all of Reynolds’ environmental efforts.

It is important to note not all who farm contribute to these excesses. But for all the conservationists who practice good land and water stewardship, there are some bad actors. Notably, large animal confinement operations.

At one northwest Iowa Interview session, an Iowan said, “I don’t have a lot of sympathy for Des Moines because we’ve been dealing with worse and for a long time and no one cared.” To which I say, “Fair enough!”

As someone who has been hired to solve problems for clients, I have to provide a list of actions and eventually a plan for how to achieve results. In this case there are several key actions which need to be included in a solution strategy, especially for a problem of this size and scale. This list is a starting list, not a full list, as I’m still learning about the scope of the problem.

  • Fill the 2010 Natural Resources and Outdoor Recreation Trust Fund as supported by 63 percent of Iowans.
  • Revert control of livestock zoning in each county to local leadership.
  • Enforce a moratorium on any new animal confinement construction until environmental protections are approved.
  • Rewrite existing manure management plan requirements to align application amounts with crop needs.
  • Set a state cap on the number of animal confinement operations.
  • Create policies that align fertilizer inputs with recommendations from Iowa State University.
  • Penalize farmers who are ignoring conservation recommendations with creative tax laws and other policies that reward environmentally-friendly decision making.
  • We need to address the problem of the multinational corporations that don’t care about Iowa’s quality of life.

The goal of clean water should not be a partisan problem or an urban vs. rural problem; the status quo is a threat to all Iowans. It is time to do the work that needs to be done to achieve a positive result for everyone. If elected as your next governor, I will put my problem solving skills to work to find a resolution on this critical problem.

Top photo of spring in Waterloo, Iowa, is by Amdizdarevic, available via Shutterstock.

About the Author(s)

Julie Stauch

  • To present a more complete picture...

    …the Iowa rowcrop farmers and landowners who are doing really good conservation (and three giant cheers for them) are far, far outnumbered by the Iowa rowcrop farmers and landowners who are not. CAFOs are a major problem but not the only problem. Iowa wouldn’t have such widespread awful water if it weren’t for a large majority of farmers and landowners who are applying more fertilizer than recommended and/or not doing adequate conservation on their land. In many cases, the amount of farm conservation being done could be accurately described as “barely the inadequate minimum that is required to get Farm Bill subsidies.”

    I point that out here and now only because BH provides an (appreciated) opportunity for water education. Water has not been an election-winning issue in this red state in past years, and voting and acting against water protection remains a politically-safe thing to do. If there are serious signs that that is changing, I’d welcome seeing the evidence. That Brenna Bird felt so free this week to wrist-tap the company that caused one of the biggest and most destructive fertilizer spills in the history of Iowa seems to indicate that change is not happening.

  • The Unseen Dinosaur in the Room

    Ok, multinational corporations are mentioned as not caring. But missing is the penalization of farmers by this anti-farmer corporate lobby, including CAFOs, where farmers are forced to subsidize them via below cost farm prices, (i.e. corn, 1981-2006 except 1996, 2014-2020). Because the Republican ideology of ‘free’ markets, (or the markets we actually have,) fails on both supply and demand, leading to cheap, below cost farm prices most of the time. This subsidization of CAFOs by farmers led to the loss of livestock from most farms, & then to the massive loss of pastures, hay fields and nurse crops for these like oats. This is almost wholly unknown in media and social movements for clean water and related issues. It’s a federal issue, yes, though the Iowa legislature passed minimum price legislation during the 1980s, (led by Iowa CCI, vetoed by Branstad).

  • A Good Message from Julie.

    I consider myself fairly well attuned to current and political events.

    Yet, I acknowledge the Bleeding Heartland community has opened my eyes and educated me regarding farming process issues that lead to water and other environmental problems.

    While I believe the economy and government overreach will be the Dems best issues in 2026, my gut tells me water quality could also resonate in Iowa . . . especially when linked with increased cancer rates.

    The phrase “climate change” should be tossed in the ash bin. Water and air quality, however, are not divisive political terms to mainstream voters.

    I’d have to think most voters want clean water and air for their children and grandchildren.

    There’s an opportunity to pick up a couple of House seats and make a hard run at the governorship. I assume a few state legislature seats could be picked up as well.

    Dems need to be smart in their messaging and keep it simple. Don’t get pulled into culture debates.

    The economy . . . government overreach . . . clean air and water.

  • Pollution at National Seniors Game

    Pollution of waterways in Iowa is so bad but state government ignores it at our peril.
    A relative came to town to participate in the triathlon of the National Seniors Games, but the water leg of the race had to be cancelled because the pollution at the Raccoon River Park in WDM was about 10 times worse than the desired limit. So a 5K run became the third leg. It was the only event that had to be cancelled because of the pollution. But the athletes at the finish line were a joyful group. Great camaraderie.
    And they got to go back to homes across the nation while we’re stuck with polluted waterways and state officials who refuse to do anything about it.
    Herb Strentz

  • Thank you, Brad, Bill, and Herb

    Thank you, Brad and Herb, for information that is new to me. And Bill, I hope very much that you will turn out to be right about water.

Comments