Proposed CAFO expansion threatens Scott County water, air quality

The Scott County Board of Supervisors will vote August 19 on a proposed major expansion of a Grandview Farms Inc., a confined animal feeding operation owned by Thomas Dittmer. The supervisors' public hearing on the matter drew large numbers of supporters and opponents earlier this month. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources has authority to issue permits, but the county's recommendation may influence the DNR's decision on the expansion. If approved, the CAFO could nearly double its annual production of hogs from 80,000 to 150,000.  

Scott County officials who reported to the supervisors gave the CAFO expansion proposal 480 on the "master matrix" evaluation system, where 880 is the maximum number of points and 440 is needed to pass. However, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement disputes that score on several grounds:  

Factory farm operator Tom Dittmer discharged manure into a tile line that runs into a tributary of Hickory Creek, a state waterway, according to preliminary test results obtained by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (DNR) during a site survey conducted last Friday [August 6].  

Iowa Legislative Code 459.311(1); 567 and Iowa Administrative Code 65.2(3) both state, "A confinement feeding operation shall not discharge manure directly into water of the state or into a tile line that discharges into a water of the state."  

"We have a documented discharge from the confinement to a tile line," Dennis Ostwinkle, Supervisor of the Iowa DNR's Field Office in Washington, said in an email correspondence with Iowa CCI Tuesday.  

The DNR field investigation was prompted in part by complaints filed by the Quad City Waterkeepers, Illinois Citizens for Clean Air and Water, and Iowa CCI.  According to Ostwinkle, the field tests were submitted to the University of Iowa Hygenics Lab for further testing. If the preliminary field tests are confirmed, the violation could force a deduction of an additional 25 points from Dittmer's Master Matrix score. Scott County Iowa CCI members have already identified 160 points that should be deducted from the Master Matrix score.

 

While water pollution is a primary concern of those who oppose CAFO expansions, large hog lots can also compromise air quality. As Paul Deaton discussed at Blog for Iowa, CAFOs near industrial areas pose a particular risk:  

According to the 2010 State of the Environment report from the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, "In Iowa, most fine particle pollution forms in the atmosphere when ammonia (from animal feeding operations, fertilizer application and other natural sources) combines with sulfuric or nitric acid (from power plants, automobiles and other combustion sources) to create tiny particles."  

Expanding the amount of ammonia emitted in Scott County, which the additional capacity of Dittmer's hog lot would do, combined with the heavy industry already there would create additional fine particulate matter. It is a formula for trouble as it pertains to human health.  

It works like this: ammonia from livestock operations is emitted into the atmosphere where it combines with sulfuric or nitric acid emitted from burning coal and creates fine particulate matter which gets into the lungs of people and causes significant health problems in the form of increased incidence of asthma, cardio-respiratory problems and increase morbidity and mortality.

Let's not talk about the fact that Davenport and neighboring Muscatine and Rock Island Counties were identified by the United States Environmental Agency as being in non-attainment for fine particulate matter. During the phase in of testing for fine particulate matter, Scott and Muscatine Counties were identified as being in non-attainment according to newly promulgated standards.

 

Congressman Bruce Braley, who represents Scott County, is a friend of Dittmer and "submitted a letter in support of the expansion,&quot. State Senator Joe Seng of Davenport has not taken a position for or against the proposal.  

Seng said he was “sort of sitting on the fence” about the project. But as chairman of the Agriculture and Natural Resources Budget subcommittee, he believes funding needs to be restored for odor quality research.

 

Wrong answer, Senator Seng. The “odor-study bill” approved by Iowa legislators in 2008 was a waste of time and money, because Iowa taxpayers already paid to study this issue, and research conducted in other states has identified “cost effective ways to mitigate odor” from hog lots.

If you live in Scott County and are concerned about the potential increase in air and water pollution, please consider contacting the five members of the Board of Supervisors before Thursday, August 19. Phone calls or old-fashioned letters are harder to ignore than e-mails.

LATE UPDATE: The Scott County board of supervisors approved the planned CAFO. Molly Regan, a former former Soil and Water Commissioner for the county, has more on this story at Blog for Iowa.

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Seng

    Not having really studied the Scott matter, are there any alternative buyers of the land that the Commission could use as an excuse not to give Dittmer the land?  I know that it will be said that the environmental degradation is reason enough, but you have to have alternative plans.

    Joe Seng seems to be aggravating people on both sides of many environmental issues so to me that’s evidence he’s doing something right.  

    • it's not a land purchase issue

      it’s whether he will be granted a permit to nearly double hog production when he can’t adequately deal with all the manure his hogs produce now. I think 1,000 hogs produce as much waste as approximately 30,000 people.

      Factory owners need permits if they want to massively increase the pollution they create. The farm owner would benefit from the expansion, but how many others would suffer adverse consequences from air and water pollution?

      • I respectfully disagree

        I don’t think Dittmer will end up harming a high amount of people with his factory farm.  As usual, the environmental movement comes forward to complain, but offers little to no alternative on economic development.  

        • Francis Thicke

          has written a whole book on how sustainable farming practices would actually be better for farmers and rural areas economically.

          Why do you think Iowa has some of the worst water quality in the nation? Why does the Des Moines Water Works have to use more powerful equipment than cities 10 times the size of Des Moines use in their water treatment plants?

          • Farming

            Farming is going to do some bad things to your water quality, its the nature of the beast.  This is a farm state to paraphrase Patty Judge.

            I’m voting for Northey anyway to be honest.  I voted for O’Brien in 2006 and regretted it because I wanted Dusky Teery to win, he seemed more pro-business.  Thicke is too much of an unrealistic environmentalist.

            I’m also going to vote for Jamison, not because he’s worth much, but Fitzgerald takes the job for granted.

            I’ll be voting Democratic in the other races including my State Rep. Jerry Kearns.  

  • Amendment

    I am still undecided about the Loebsack race, his voting record has been closer to the center as of late which scores points with me.  

Comments