Adventures in unwise Facebook use

Clerking for a state legislator is a great first job in politics, but here’s a warning to the young and politically involved: sharing your personal views on Facebook can get you fired. Tyler Kingkade has the story at the Iowa State Daily:

Jessica Bruning didn’t think her personal stance on political issues would jeopardize her position as a clerk with Rep. Renee Schulte, R-Linn, in the Iowa legislature. However, after a Facebook post bucked the Republican party’s stance on the impeachment of the state Supreme Court justices, she quickly found herself out of a job.

She had been told to “tone it down” after the State of the Judiciary speech by Chief Justice Mark Cady, where she took part in standing ovations along with Democrats.

During the 2010 election season, Bruning worked for the Branstad-Reynolds campaign but often shared information on Facebook about Justice Not Politics – a bipartisan group formed to advocate retention of the justices. […]

Bruning continued to share articles and information in support of the justices after the elections as House Republicans began talk of impeaching the remaining judges.

But after a Facebook post in January, the next thing Bruning knew she was let go from her position as a clerk. She said she currently cannot go into further details on the event.

Technically, the Iowa House Republican caucus isn’t committed to impeaching the four remaining justices who concurred in the Varnum v Brien ruling on marriage. In fact, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rich “we want to drive procreation” Anderson has said he doubts articles of impeachment would clear his committee. Nevertheless, I’m not surprised that Bruning got fired by criticizing the impeachment drive, especially after she stood up to applaud Chief Justice Cady. His speech wasn’t warmly received by the House Republican caucus.

To me, the most surprising thing about this story is that Bruning was hired as a clerk for Schulte despite having criticized the anti-retention drive during the campaign. To my knowledge, not a single Iowa GOP lawmaker or legislative candidate advocated voting to retain the three Supreme Court justices on the ballot. Speaking to Kingkade,

Bruning said young people are often told throughout their years in school to get involved and voice their opinion, “Then when I post a simple Facebook status, I get fired. They’re conflicting messages.”

That’s the way the cookie crumbles if your Facebook status goes against your political party’s dominant view. If Bruning had been lambasting the justices on social media, or bashing impeachment while clerking for a Democratic state representative, she’d still have a job today.

UPDATE: Schulte disputes Bruning’s account but declined to specify why the clerk was sacked:

Two weeks ago, Schulte gave The Des Moines Register a brief statement about Bruning’s assertion, deferring additional questions to House Republican leadership.

“The short answer is no,” she was not fired for supporting same-sex marriage rights, Schulte told the Register. “Basically she’s an at-will employee. It could be for any reason. It makes me sad that she thinks that that’s why.”

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Point missed.

    I think you missed the point. In this case, it seems to be a violation of her First Amendment rights as well an ethical violation. Does Bruning need to believe in everything that the current Iowa Republican Party believes in? No. I think that the overarching point of Kingkade’s article was that the current regime in the Iowa House is going to desperate, extreme lengths to make sure that everyone stays in ideological rank. Try again.  

    • Not so fast

      I’d want my Demo-side employees to be “believers”, or at least “believers-above-reproach” in public. I’d categorize my employees’ tootings or twinkings or facebackings (or whatever the heck all those communucations formats are named)as being part of that expected “public” image.

      I see another issue, and that is one of trust. I don’t know what clerks do nor how much they hear or see, but I’d expect utter loyalty and confidentiality from my Demo-side employees. If one of them were tweeting things for the world to read, I’d logically worry about my information security.

      It’s possible I opened myself there to an argument from someone about the people’s business being “open” etc. Please don’t anyone pull that on me because the reality is that legislating does require wheedling and dealing and I have no problem with it taking place.

      So I darn well want to trust my employees and that means I’d hire only vetted people I could trust. That young lady must’ve slipped thru somehow. I don’t blame any legislator for firing her (of either Party, what’s proper is proper and she wasn’t)

    • Nonsense.

      This violates her First Amendment Rights?  Bull.  Bruning has the right to post whatever she wants on Facebook.  She does not have the right to remain a clerk for Schulte.

    • the Iowa GOP is not a big tent

      That has been clear for a long time. Not a single moderate in either chamber was willing to speak out for retaining the judges, or against the constitutional amendment on marriage. This clerk knew that going into the job.

      My first amendment right to expression doesn’t mean my employer can’t fire me for what I post on Facebook.

    • She's wrong about school

      At least in the Education department, they drilled it into all of our heads: watch what you say on Facebook, don’t talk about work on Facebook, keep a professional image on Facebook, etc.

      Maybe they’re not doing this in other departments, but it’s a point they really drove home for us–especially if you’re interning or job hunting.

    • moderates?

      is there a moderate left in the Legislature?  

  • Jessica Bruning

    Maybe Jessica could find a place working or interning with the Libertarian Party in some way or with an independent.    

  • Schulte

    Schulte had a right to fire to fire here, but unless Bruning was refusing to print off materials for Schulte or trying to personally influence Schulte, the firing makes no sense.

    This is why we need to get rid of litmus tests in politics to be honest.  

    We’re going towards a dangerous zone in politics.  It’s like the TARP vote.  Are most people who disagreed with the TARP vote going to admit that the government has made money on the program? No.

    Are people who are opposed to the marriage ruling of the Iowa Supreme Court going to admit that the fact that a loving couple who gets married has no negative impact on their lives?  Of course not.  This is because people on both sides of the aisle are not letting facts get in the way of their opinions.  

    • Purity Tests

      I agree, and I think it is good to not homogenize views based on political parties.  

      Renee Schulte could have let Jessica be a good example of cooperating in a professional setting with someone that doesn’t have the same view on a popular issue.

Comments