Jacobs Has Poor Case Against Same Day Registration

Des Moines Representative Libby Jacobs argued against same day voter registration today on Iowa public radio, but threw in the towel when asked for evidence to support her view point.

The only legitimate argument Jacobs made was that voters could cast multiple ballots at multiple polls if the bill passes.  When asked if this actually happens in the several states that have practised same day registration for many years, Jacobs said she hasn’t kept up with the results in other states. 

Ha!  You can bet she’d know about it if there actually were any evidence of busybody voters.  So she is just using this argument without bothering to see if it’s true?

Jacobs and a couple callers made other, even weaker points against the bill.  Jacobs wanted to make sure voters were “eductated” and implied that educated voters would have been registered under the old system.  A caller said if voters couldn’t get registered under the old system they wouldn’t be likely to use the new more lenient system anyway.  Another caller worried that last minute campaign surprises (i.e., dirty tricks) might prompt new voters to pour into the polls based on erroneous information. 

These three arguments all indicate lack of faith in law-abiding voters. 

So opponents don’t trust voters to have good judgement, to be educated or to behave honestly.  All these worries can be directed against voters who register well in advance of elections.  There is apparently no bureaucratic reason for requiring advance registration.  At least no one  mentioned one today.

Jacobs also said this is not a partisan issue in that there is no Republican party caucus position on it.  It’s just a coincidence that the bill passed the House state government committee on a party line vote!

About the Author(s)

IowaVoter

  • Response voice

    Just out of curiosity, did Iowa Public Radio have anyone speak against Rep. Jacobs?  It might be a nice effort of the liberal activists here in the state to start holding media entities accountable, similar to the way Media Matters does nationally (and with specific statewide focuses like Media Matters Colorado).

    • Beth Wessel-Kroeschell

      Yes, Beth Wessel-Kroeschell of Ames was on the show advocating the bill.  At least two callers endorsed the bill, one claiming to be a constituent of Jacobs.

      I focussed on Jacobs because I’ve met her.  I once heard her described as a rising star.  She shepherded the original HAVA bill through the legislature in 2003.  She stalled paper trail legislation last year by tying it to a photo id requirement for all voters, using the same argument about fraudulent voters who will vote as someone else if they can.

      I think she’s smart enough to know better.  That’s why (I think) she quickly denied knowing whether other same day registration states have any problems with it. 

      If they had problems, we’d hear about them.  They do have higher turnout.

Comments