Moderate Rees left out of IA-03 Republican debate

It’s early in the campaign season, but Benton County Advocates (whoever they are) are on track to be the worst debate organizers of the year. They are hosting a debate on April 27 in Vinton for three Republican candidates in Iowa’s third Congressional district. Seven candidates qualified for the ballot, but Benton County Advocates invited only Dave Funk, Jim Gibbons and Brad Zaun to take part in the debate, Iowa Independent reported today.

Speaking on behalf of the Benton County Advocates, Bill Keller explained the reasoning in the comments section of Iowa Independent:

The rules, as displayed in the group event linked in your article, were quite clear. We were going to look at the individual contributions and take the top three earners. Mr. Gibbons was first place with $344,598, Mr. Zaun was second with $83,380 and Mr. Funk was third with $69,141. Mr. Reese raised $12,050, less that 1/5th his nearest competitor. While Mr. Reese rightly states he has more cash on hand than all but Mr. Gibbons, the part he leaves out is that of the $64,000 reported to the FEC, $54,000 of that money was contributed by Mr. Reese himself. While that is certainly a firm statement of his belief in his political path, we believe individual contributions are a broader yardstick to measure his viability within the 3rd district.

Our group chose individual contributions as the marker because we felt it was a solid indicator of support within the 3rd district. If a candidate presents his views and has the electorate listen to them, we believe their direct financial support is a solid indicator of a candidate’s viability. Since Mr. Reese did not meet the minimum requirement of our selection criteria, he was not invited.

Here’s some free advice, Mr. Keller: you would sound more credible if you spelled the candidate’s name correctly at least once.

The substance of Keller’s argument wasn’t convincing either. Granted, a debate with seven candidates could get unwieldy, and some of the men on the ballot for the IA-03 primary aren’t running real campaigns. In contrast, Rees has hired paid campaign staff and has been actively campaigning around the district for the last few months. He has yard signs out around the Des Moines suburbs and a strong online presence too.

What was the rationale for including only three candidates, rather than the four who are most actively seeking Leonard Boswell’s job (Rees, Funk, Zaun and Gibbons)? Why judge who is credible based only on individual contributions rather than overall financial strength? Rees has more cash on hand than Funk or Zaun and has said he is prepared to commit $200,000 of his own money to the campaign. Plenty of successful candidates have largely self-funded their first campaigns.

The April 27 debate in Vinton would have been more interesting with Rees in the mix, because he is trying to fill a more moderate niche in the GOP. Without him, the debate is likely to be a boring display of right-wing sloganeering. Who wants to watch Zaun, Gibbons and Funk try to one-up each other as the true conservative? The Benton County Advocates blew it.

Any comments about the IA-03 campaign are welcome in this thread. Whose yard signs, barn signs and bumper stickers are you seeing in your corner of the district? Here in Windsor Heights I’ve only seen yard signs for Zaun and Rees. Apparently Gibbons has some signs up on commercial properties in the Des Moines area, especially those owned by Denny Elwell in Ankeny.

About the Author(s)

desmoinesdem

  • Is this the first debate since the filing deadline?

    If so, this is the first look that many people are having of the candidates.  These glimpses can be important to raising money.  Jim Gibbons is all over the internet with his ads as well.  I think he might want to hire policy consultants to help him out though.  

  • there are LOTS of measures as to why Rees was left out....

    1. you don’t say that you are “ready to commit” a large amount of funds, and then don’t really do it…every candidate could say or do that.

    2. Rees polling numbers are negligible…and not moving.

    3. Rees isn’t getting ANYONE to donate to him..virtually all of his contributions are from him or his family

    4. maybe most importantly, Rees has been dull and off-putting on the stump in previous debates (basically reading pre-written material) as well as completely embarrassing in this week’s Deace interview, where Steve completely undressed the woefully unprepared candidate and frankly made Reese look foolish with seemingly zero moral values.

    this feighned “indignation” about the invite is much ado about nothing, and certainly Rees involvement at this point would not be a race changer.

  • There are always limits

    A few thought heres about Mr. Rees (tnx for the spelling update).  What are the bounds then?  At one end, if you collect enough signatures to be on the ballot, should that be the lone qualifier?  Are 7 too many, 3 too few?  How do you have a real discussion in 60 minutes with 7 people and have anything truly said?  Even with 3 it will be a very compressed evening.  As I stated in my response to the article, the fact that Mr. Rees has the second most amount of money on hand says little about his political viability.  However, the fact he has less than 1/5 of the contributions from individuals as his next closest competitor says a bit more.

    And, finally, on a side note, it would be nice if Mr. Rees shared that BCA were the first to offer him a debate platform back in October that he shared with Dave Funk and Pat Bertroche.  We offered this before he had even offically filed with the state.  It was a full 90 minute opportunity to present his positions to the folks of Benton County.

    • 7 is probably too many

      But I think four is a reasonable number, and four candidates are clearly running active campaigns in IA-03. You could define “active” in many ways, but I would say anyone who has yard signs out, has been holding events around the district, has paid staff and has made a major financial commitment to the campaign qualifies.

      Many self-funding candidates have proved viable. The NRCC just endorsed Rob Gettemy in IA-02, even though he’s raised a lot less in individual contributions than Rathje or Miller-Meeks. Almost all of Gettemy’s cash on hand is from his own personal loan.

Comments