Secretary Pate, Stop Using African-Americans as Tokens for Your Voter ID Proposal

ACLU of Iowa Policy Counsel Daniel Zeno explains why the secretary of state's voter ID plan would disproportionately affect African-Americans. -promoted by desmoinesdem

Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate is pushing hard for a bill that would implement voter ID in Iowa. It’s bad enough that Secretary Pate’s proposal is discriminatory against African-American Iowans (more about that in a moment). But we also object to the manner in which he promotes his proposal by tokenizing a few prominent African-Americans, in a highly misleading way.

Voter ID laws like the one Pate proposes are part of an ongoing strategy to roll back decades of progress on voting rights. These laws deprive many voters, including many African-Americans, of their right to vote, reduce participation, and stand in direct opposition to our country’s trend of including more Americans in the democratic process. These laws create more hoops for people to jump through simply to exercise their constitutionally protected right to vote. Voter ID laws are especially tragic since the type of voter fraud they are purported to prevent – identity fraud – is all but nonexistent. And they cost states millions of dollars to implement.

Pate’s proposal would be one of the strictest in the country. It allows a voter to show only an Iowa driver’s license, passport or military ID to vote. Pate has said that voters would who don’t have one of the three IDs above will get a “free” voter ID card. But those cards would go only to those Iowans who are already registered—not all eligible Iowans.

We strongly oppose Pate’s proposal because it would deprive thousands of Iowans, including and perhaps especially, African-American Iowans, of their legal right to vote.

Voter ID laws are problematic and discriminatory because they require voters to show a certain type of photo ID. That is a problem because:

• 11 percent of Iowa’s voting-age population doesn’t have an Iowa driver’s license or non-operator ID, according to the U.S. Census Bureau and Iowa Department of Transportation. That’s more than 260,000 Iowans.

• According the Brennan Center, nationally up to 25 percent of African-Americans don’t have a state issued photo ID.

• In five Iowa counties, where almost 70 percent of African-American Iowans live, the rates of African Americans without a photo ID tracks that national number and is disproportionately high to the rates of white Iowans with a photo ID. Comparing data from the Iowa State Data Center and Commission on the Status of African-Americans with the Iowa DOT and U.S. Census, we know that in Black Hawk County, while African-Americans make up only 10 percent of voting age residents, they comprise 27 percent of voting age residents who lack an Iowa driver’s license or non-operator ID. In Scott County, they make up only 9 percent of voting age residents, but comprise 24 percent of those without the ID; in Polk County, they make up only 8 percent of voting age residents, but 21 percent of those without an ID; and in Linn and Johnson Counties, where African-Americans make up only 6 percent of all eligible voters, they make up 16 percent of those without the ID. Thus, Pate’s proposal would most certainly have a disproportionate impact on African-Americans in those counties.

Compounding the problem, studies have found that voter ID laws are enforced in a discriminatory way, with African-Americans being questioned about their IDs far more than white voters. If Pate is successful in convincing Iowa legislators to pass his or any other voter ID bill, it’s with the full knowledge that they are disproportionately targeting racial minorities’ access to the ballot box.

African-Americans have been deliberately and systematically disenfranchised in this country for centuries. Although some laws have changed, African-Americans’ right to vote continues to be under attack. For example, right here in Iowa, we know that as many as 1 in 4 voting-age African-American Iowans can be expected to face lifetime disenfranchisement because of Iowa’s regressive and harmful felony voting policies.

Secretary Pate’s proposal is flat-out discriminatory against African-American Iowans and his citing African-Americans who he wants to believe would support it doesn’t change that.

An especially offensive part of Pate’s misinformation campaign is to cite only African-Americans, with wording that vaguely suggests they might endorse voter ID. They include, specifically, Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first African-American U.S. Supreme Court justice; Martin Luther King, III, son of Martin Luther King, Jr.; and Andrew Young, first African-American Ambassador to the U.N. and the second African-American mayor of Atlanta.

This is as misleading as it is ugly. First, there is no evidence that any of these men support Pate’s proposal. And even if they did, the suggestion that because a few prominent African-Americans support a proposal, then it can’t be bad for African-Americans is laughable, repulsive and blatant tokenism.

Iowa is well known for having one of the best voting systems in the country. Secretary Pate said so in October 2016 and he has repeatedly said so since. We agree.

The right to vote is fundamental and it is the job of all our elected officials, especially the Secretary of State, to protect that right. We urge Secretary Pate, to do just that and stop using African-Americans as tokens to push his voter ID proposal.

Top image: Daniel Zeno, policy counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa. Cross-posted from the ACLU of Iowa site.

  • thank you

    for sharing this perspective.

    Although Secretary Pate's bill does not require photo ID, it still would create new barriers for Iowans who do not have a passport or Iowa driver's license.

    I suspect that Iowa House and Senate Republicans will include a photo ID requirement in the eventual bill anyway.

  • A community organizing goal?

    I find this proposed bill by Pate to be odious. As an African American whose family has been living and paying taxes in Iowa since then late 1800's, I have to say that Iowa Nice as certainly been made invalid by these tactics.
    With that said, the goal of getting those potential voters the proper ID would seem to be a worthy challenge for community based groups. (CCI, or churches sponsoring "souls to the polls" or more appropriately "souls to the DMV")
    In the 60's we didn't cry 'cause the Man wouldn't let us vote...we lawyered up and sat down until they came to their senses.
    Nowadays, all you have to do is spend some time and (I hope) a nominal amount of cash to the the thing.
    ...of course, if Dems don't give (black, white red, or yellow) voters anything to get excited about, all of the above is moot. =-)
    Again thanks for being the blog All Iowa Depends On...

  • This is where we really need to fight

    While I continue to be disgusted with republicans gutting the education budget, healthcare, worker's rights, ect. Pate's campaign to restrict voting rights is what really scares me. The Iowa GOP is clearly looking to the successes the GOP has managed in Wisconsin and North Carolina in combining voter suppression and gerrymandering into the beginnings of a permanent majority.

    Everything else they have done so far can be undone or fixed to some extent if dems can actually organize and win elections. This marks the beginning of an effort to legislate the democrats out of being able to remain competitive via targeting core constituencies.

Login or Join to comment and post.