Both major parties are on the air in Iowa House district 82, where voters will choose a new state lawmaker three weeks from today. Whereas the last two special House elections happened in heavily Republican or Democratic districts, the late Curt Hanson represented a politically balanced area. The outcome on August 8 could shape the media narrative about political trends in Iowa and affect candidate recruitment for other competitive statehouse races.
Republicans were first to run negative advertising in most of the 2016 Iowa House and Senate campaigns, but Democrats defending House district 82 have already launched a brutal spot about the Republican candidate's "tax problem."
Last week, Bleeding Heartland covered background on the candidates and the political landscape in this southeast Iowa district. That post also includes the first positive ad for Democrat Phil Miller, a veterinarian and school board member in Fairfield, the district's largest town.
Since then, Republicans have introduced their nominee Travis Harris to television viewers with this spot:
Travis Harris: I loved raising our kids right here on our farm in Moulton, Iowa. [Harris speaks to the camera with a rural landscape in the background; words on screen TRAVIS HARRIS State Representative campaign logo, HARRIS FOR IOWA]
Teaching them about value of family and hard work on the farm. [As Harris speaks, viewer sees footage of him walking with his relatives on the farm; words on screen TRAVIS HARRIS STATE REPRESENTATIVE, FAMILY VALUES HARD WORK]
I'm Travis Harris and I believe our local farmers are our backbone. [Harris speaks to camera; his campaign logo and LOCAL FARMER appear next to him]
That's why I'm running, to fight for our local farmers, protect our way of life, and to give us a voice in Des Moines. [viewer sees footage of Harris on his farm, logo and HARRIS FOR IOWA, then OUR VOICE IN DES MOINES appear on screen]
I'm Travis Harris, and I'd like your vote. [Harris speaks to camera, logo and HARRIS FOR IOWA, VOTE TUESDAY AUGUST 8th on screen]
Female voice-over: Tuesday, August 8th, vote Travis Harris. Harris for Iowa. [footage of Harris walking beans on the farm, then smiling into camera to close out spot]
A little cookie-cutter for my tastes, but this ad should appeal to many Republican voters in a largely rural district. To my ear, "protect our way of life" foreshadows GOP attacks soon to come against Miller. A telephone poll testing messages about the Democrat featured some deceptive language about the alleged danger of permitting transgender students to use the bathroom of their choice in Fairfield schools.
As far as I know, the GOP hasn't put up any negative tv ads yet in House district 82. The Iowa Democratic Party's new spot highlights the Republican candidate's "tax problem."
Female voice-over: Travis Harris has tax problems. Lots of 'em. [viewer sees picture of the GOP candidate, next to words POLITICIAN TRAVIS HARRIS, and surrounded by TAX PROBLEMS]
See, tax problem Travis missed paying property taxes dozens and dozens and dozens of times. [different photo of Harris, holding a sign that reads TAX PROBLEM TRAVIS HARRIS; what appears to be a list of property tax payments stamped "LATE" is on the right side of the screen]
104 times total on sixteen different properties. [same photo of Harris holding sign, next to words 104 LATE PROPERTY TAX PAYMENTS Davis County tax records]
Sadly for you, politician Travis Harris was on time for work, where he repeatedly raised taxes and fees on the school board, and your electric bill on a utility board. [back to first photo of "TAX PROBLEM TRAVIS HARRIS" next to words RAISED TAXES FEES UTILITY BILLS; sources provided are Moulton-Udell School Board Minutes 2007-2014 and Southern Iowa Electric Cooperative press release, 2/29/16]
Taxin' Travis Harris: won't pay his bills, happy to raise yours. [back to photo of Harris holding sign; words on screen TAXIN' TRAVIS HARRIS WON'T PAY HIS BILLS HAPPY TO RAISE YOURS]
Some may complain that this ad doesn't give voters a reason to support Phil Miller. But Democrats are are also running a positive spot about their candidate on local television. In a low-turnout special election, giving anti-tax voters a reason not to make the effort to cast a ballot can be helpful. Also worth noting: candidates representing the Libertarian Party and Constitution Party have qualified for the ballot in House district 82, giving conservatives who would never vote for a Democrat other options besides Harris.
Total spending on this race may top half a million dollars. Hanson prevailed in a closely-watched 2009 special election by only about 100 votes out of more than 8,000 cast.
Any relevant thoughts are welcome in this thread, especially from people who have been on the ground lately in Davis, Van Buren, or Jefferson counties.
Map of House district 82:
I grew up in a state that wasn't politically dominated by agriculture. Maybe that's one reason I am tired of Iowa political ads that imply that only farmers truly work hard, and that other Iowans should admire that as unquestionable truth.
And when I hear about a Republican candidate intending to "fight for our local farmers," I figure a big part of the real meaning is "fight to protect our local farmers from those awful Iowans who want farmers to be required to do something about massive farm pollution besides wait around for years until they can get extremely generous public funding for whatever they might choose to voluntarily do."
Bromides, hand waving and continuing corporate control...
More meaningless noise from both sides. Choice a.) Republican. Choice b.) Pretending not to be republican. Vapid empty "promises" about fuzzy topics. Actual topics discussed of consequence to Iowa voters and how to achieve them? Zero. CAFO's, Nope. Ag chemicals? Zip. Issues within the Dem party? Nada.
Seems an odd expectation
Why would someone running in a general election raise issues within the Dem party? That hardly seems a winning strategy -- the 2/3rds of the voters who are R and NP really don't care much about the family fight in the Dem party, and some non-trivial percentage of the Dems won't be happy about your position on it, either. Seems like political suicide.