Iowa can do better than "Right to Work"

Jen Pellant is president and field coordinator of the Western Iowa Labor Federation. This essay is slightly adapted from a speech she gave at a February 26 rally at the state capitol. Photo of Jen Pellant speaking at that event is by Al Womble, political director of the Iowa Federation of Labor.

This year’s Iowa legislative session has brought us yet another attack on Chapter 20 of the Public Employee Relations Act of 1974. Once again, extreme Republican lawmakers are attempting to roll back labor protections for public employees by making it easier for employers to de-certify their unions. These protections were originally forged by a bipartisan coalition of Iowa’s elected officials and led to more than 40 years of middle-class prosperity and good state/state employee relations in this state.

Yet here we are after the draconian cuts to Chapter 20 that occurred in 2017, and apparently it wasn’t enough to kill off public sector unions. Iowa’s public employees are tired of losing ground and attempting to defend what’s left. It’s time to go back to the beginning and look at the bigger picture. That’s why I stood in the capitol rotunda last week and talked about the grandaddy of all union-busting laws: so-called “Right to Work” legislation, and why it’s time for Iowa to repeal it.  

“Right to Work” has been in Iowa Code since 1947. And like many bad legislative ideas, it did not originate in Iowa. It was the brainchild of folks in the segregated South, who didn’t like that unions were bringing together people of every race, color, and creed to fight for the dignity of workers and the chance at a middle-class life.

So they came up with this cleverly-named law, which has an insidious purpose: to keep workers divided, struggling, and in poverty. Some of our most revered and famous civil rights activists immediately saw it for what it was. In fact, Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said of Right-to-Work legislation: “It’s purpose is to destroy labor unions. In our glorious fight for civil rights, we must guard against being fooled by false slogans, such as ‘right to work.’ It is a law to rob us of our civil rights and job rights.”

It is a law to rob us of our civil rights and job rights—and it’s been robbing Iowans for 76 years. This law does nothing for Iowans’ “right to work.” On the contrary, it’s about a corporation’s right to work their employees for lower wages, fewer benefits, and with no regard for their health or safety.

How do we know it’s a right to work for less? Because wages in “Right to Work” states are about 3.1 percent lower than in free-bargaining states.

How do we know it is a right to work unhealthy? Because the data shows that the rates of insured workers are about 6 percent higher in free-bargaining states.

How do we know it’s a right to work dangerously? Because the Bureau of Labor Statistics has shown that workers in “Right to Work” states like Iowa have a 54 percent higher rate of workplace fatalities than workers in free-bargaining states.

The data is clear about where this nonsense takes a state. Rates of poverty, infant mortality, unemployment, uninsured folks, and workplace deaths are all higher in “Right to Work” states. Public education funding, wages, and median household incomes are all lower.

Now is the time to finally break free of this 76-year-old relic of the past. More than 70 percent of Americans approve of unions and the work we’re doing, but only 6 percent of Iowans have the opportunity to work a good union job here. Why? Because of union-busting legislation like our so-called “Right to Work” law.

It doesn’t have to be like this. We can do better.

Michigan enacted “Right to Work” in 2012. And after only ten years of it, they lost 40,000 union members. Wages throughout the state stagnated. So in 2022, Michigan workers decided they had seen enough. They flipped their legislature and repealed Right to Work for the working families in their state.

On February 22, the Republican-controlled New Hampshire legislature decisively voted down a new “Right to Work” law in their state. Why? Because they see it for what it is. A bridge to nowhere, a race to the bottom, a war on workers.

If another state with a Republican trifecta can see that, then this is not partisan issue. It’s an economic one. It’s a systemic one. The lives of workers are simply better in states where they are free to bargain for good wages and benefits. Economies and families are stronger. Everyone benefits.

If Michigan and New Hampshire can turn the page on “Right to Work,” so can we. Despite the clever name, it’s not a “right” for workers at all. It’s a sham. It’s a relic. It’s wrong for Iowa workers, and it’s time for it to go. Real freedom for working Iowans would mean having the freedom to choose unions without government interference on the side of corporations. Repeal “Right to Work.”

About the Author(s)

Jen Pellant

  • Beyond the buzzwords and talking points, here is the definition of right-to-work laws

    In the context of labor law in the United States, the term “right-to-work laws” refers to state laws that prohibit union security agreements between employers and labor unions which require employees who are not union members to contribute to the costs of union representation. (Wikipedia)

    The principles that unions need to convince employees to become union members, and that unions cannot tax employees who are not members, make sense. Unions can be the best or the worst thing, and they need to make their case to the employees, not force their hand. We recently saw how nefarious unions can be, when the Federal Teacher Union of Weingarten sabotaged US K-12 education during COViD.

  • freedom of choice

    If you want to join a union, great! More power to ya! However one should have that choice. No one should be forced to join a union. Have to wonder why some unions are so afraid of choice and freewill?

  • proud union member 20 years

    I would never want to force someone to join my union who doesn’t want to. That’s not the American way. Our union should attract workers without mandatory membership. If that makes me “right to work” then so be it.

  • bizarre to deny that the Republican Party

    is deeply invested in the war on workers, to the degree that this isn’t a partisan issue it’s only because corporate Dems also support capital over labor…

  • Union Members Can Lead the Change

    Right to Work would be a heavy lift in Iowa . . . yet Jen is pitch-perfect, on-point that the Iowa GOP has contempt for unions.

    This should be offensive not only to union members, but skilled workers, public employees and all professionals that Reynolds, Trump and others claim to protect.

    The GOP is not pro-worker. They can show no significant accomplishments that has improved the lives of the middle class.

    The Trump-infused fear narrative and lies around gun policy, immigration, LBGT rights and crime divert attention from the serious economic and human rights issues that actually impact people’s lives.

    This cynical strategy will continue to work for them in states like Iowa until Republicans start losing elections.

    With all respect intended, this conversation needs to advance and take hold in union halls, teacher association meetings and grass-roots public employee gatherings from Dubuque to Sioux City.

    Unions and their workers can demonstrate tremendous organization skill and strength. They can message all workers throughout the state that the GOP takes them for granted and that it’s time for real change.

    One final note. Only one U.S. President has ever walked a union picket line . . . Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

  • It is called freeloading...

    The problem is not that people are forced to join a union – you don’t want to join, don’t join. The problem is that even without joining, all workers get the same benefits the union members pay for. The workers not paying dues get to be freeloaders. It is not fair.
    Union representatives cover grievances for workers who never helped cover the cost of that service. It ain’t right.

Comments