I was asked by desmoinesdem at swing-state-project.com to crosspost here. I normally post there and at dailykos.com. PBI or Party Brand Index is a concept I have developed as a replacement for PVI.  PVI (Partisan Voting Index), which is measured by averaging the percentage of the vote from the last two presidential elections in each house district, and comparing it to the nation as a whole, is a useful shorthand for understanding the liberal v. conservative dynamics of a district. But PVI in my opinion it falls short in a number of areas. First it doesn't explain states like Arkansas or West Virginia. These states have districts who's PVIs indicates a Democrat shouldn't win, yet Democrats (outside of the presidency) win quite handily. Secondly why is this the case in Arkansas but not Oklahoma with similar PVI rated districts?

Lastly PVI can miss trends as it takes 4 years to readjust. The purpose of Party Brand Index is to give a better idea of how a candidate does not relative to how the presidential candidate did, but compared to how their generic PARTY should be expected to perform. I've tackled IN, NC, CO, VA, MO, OK, AR, now I will look at the swing states of Nevada and Iowa.

The Trust for America’s Health has released a comprehensive analysis of public health indicators in all 50 states.

You can view all the statistics for Iowa here. As you might expect, it’s a mixed bag. We do pretty well in terms of proportion of people having health insurance (40th in percentage of uninsured adults, 45th in percentage of uninsured children). We also rank 43rd in infant mortality.

On the other hand, we rank 19th in obesity, 15th in terms of shortage of dental care, and 15th in terms of the percentage of high school students who currently smoke.

Click over to find many more facts and figures.