cross-posted at La Vida Locavore
Sometimes one small step against confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) leads to another.
Over at Iowa Independent, Jason Hancock reports that
A member of the state's Environmental Protection Commission who has been labeled by critics as "pro-factory farms" has stepped down.
Ralph Klemme, a former Republican state representative from LeMars, resigned from the nine-person oversight panel, which is part of the Iowa Department of Natural Resources, late last week. He told the Coalition to Support Iowa's Farmers that the commission's "increasing tilt against agriculture" was his main reason to step down.
The commission's recent vote to reject permits for two hog confinements in Dallas County appears to have been a major factor in Klemme's decision.
I was against Klemme's appointment to this commission in 2007 because of his involvement with corporate agriculture groups.
My suspicions were warranted. In a statement welcoming Klemme's resignation, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement recounted his record of looking out for agribusiness instead of the environment:
Klemme voted in May to approve a large hog factory in Greene County that was overwhelmingly opposed by local residents, county officials and local business leaders. He also voted against a common-sense rule that would have limited the amount of manure that factory farm owners could be spread on soybean crops.
Governor Chet Culver should replace Klemme with someone committed to protecting the environment. Otherwise why call it an Environmental Protection Commission?
On the other hand, I wouldn't underestimate the clout of corporate agriculture groups that will lobby the governor to replace Klemme with a person who is equally sympathetic to their interests. We saw this summer that agriculture trumped the environment on the task forces associated with the Rebuild Iowa Commission.
Whoever takes Klemme's place on the Environmental Protection Commission, I view his resignation as a healthy sign. The majority of commission members are not willing to look the other way regarding the environmental impacts of CAFOs.