Iowa lawmakers wag their legal fingers

Randy Evans is executive director of the Iowa Freedom of Information Council, a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that promotes openness and transparency in Iowa’s state and local governments. He can be reached at DMRevans2810@gmail.com. This essay first appeared on his Substack newsletter, Stray Thoughts

Come July, Iowa employers may want to add an ominous warning on their job application forms: tell a lie and you could go to jail.

That’s right — no more puffing the resume with false degrees from the University of Okoboji or Faber College. 

And do not claim to have chauffeur’s license when you lack the permit needed to drive a truck.

That’s because Governor Kim Reynolds recently signed House File 2337 into law, making it a crime to knowingly provide false academic degrees or credentials for the purpose of obtaining employment or other personal gain.

The legislation does not use these words, but the bill could have been named the Ian Roberts Resume Fraud Act. 

Legislators saw an urgent need to act following the arrest last September of the Des Moines Public Schools superintendent. The conduct described in the new law closely tracks the misrepresentations by Roberts — fabricated academic degrees and honors that came to light only after he was jailed on immigration and gun charges.

The language in the bill the governor approved on April 16 applies to a job candidate’s academic degrees or academic credentials. The legislation also extends to when a person “knowingly and with intent” falsely represents oneself as having a license in a regulated professional or occupation.

Those positions subject to criminal penalties for misrepresentation span a wide swath of licensed work — from physicians, nurses and pharmacists, to plumbers, real estate appraisers, barbers and nursing home administrators, with many others in there, too.

The new law is punishable as a simple misdemeanor. Violators are subject to jail terms of up to 30 days and fines ranging from $105 to $855.

In fairness, though, the new law does have a loophole grounded in what an Iowa Supreme Court justice once described as the rough and tumble, Wild West world of politics. 

So, lying in politics remains largely protected, largely unpunished and largely accepted as a way of life, even though deception used to get a regular job can now land you in jail.

Indeed, the politicians who write our criminal laws are as comfortable wagging a legal finger at others who falsify their credentials and as they are in preserving a system that embraces candidates who pad their resumes or misstate their qualifications.

Who does not remember the state senator from Ottumwa and his official biography listing that he had a business degree. Turns out, he passed a training course offered through the Sizzler restaurant chain.

In politics, however, candidates and officeholders operate in a space where even demonstrably false statements are often shielded as protected speech, leaving voters — not prosecutors — to sort truth from fiction.

The problem for the voters remains that often they learn of the politician’s lie only after the votes are counted and the election is called.

Plus, when political candidates present an embellished version of their own record — polished, selective or outright false — or when they use manipulative or deceptive campaign practices, the consequences are far less certain. That’s because it is not front-page news to find out that a politician lied.

This means that when it comes to political candidates, the burden falls on voters to separate fact from fiction.

The new law offers little recourse for campaign deception, even when it is deliberate. And the ballot box recourse may have to wait until the next two-year or four-year election cycle.

So, there is another lesson the politicians buried in the new Ian Roberts Resume Fraud law: “Do as I say. Don’t do as I do.”


Top image is by Nisa Rizal, available via Shutterstock.

About the Author(s)

Randy Evans

  • What about the press?

    Randy is right that politicians lie, and it seems to be getting worse. How are voters supposed to know if the politician is lying? Why can’t the press be the voters’ agents in determining if a politician is lying? The news media seems to just be repeating what the politicians are saying and engaging in what is termed horse race journalism. Ii realize that the news media are being gutted and neutered. I wish I had a solution for that. Any ideas?

  • University of Okoboji

    Please!

    The University of Okoboji does give out a few “honorary doctorate” to real people. There is even a ceremony. My son and I are one of the few father son duos to receive this illustrious degree. Of course, it is fake, and I only put it on my resume as a talking point. I never asked my teaching salary to be based on my doctorate level of education. 🙂

    Thanks for the article. It is really interesting what catches our attention. I remember hiring an assistant debate coach. One of the reasons was his time at Oxford. He went as an exchange from ILCC, but he went for a week. That’s on me for not checking it.

  • Glad to see something good come out of the Roberts grift

    Keep up the great work Randy! This is good news. A silver lining of sorts after the “doctor” Roberts fiasco. There was a “rush to judgment”, so many blindly running to his defense before the truth came out.

  • Why should this be criminalized?

    An employer should be doing its due diligence to check academic or professional credentials. There are long-established means to do so. Professional credentials are often available to the general public online in seconds. Academic credentials are more private in most cases, but an applicant can easily be required to execute the forms to give a prospective employer access to the necessary information. Putting a criminal onus on the applicant seems to give employers something to hang over the heads of employees but also costs the taxpayer for due diligence the employer failed to perform. Are our criminal courts so empty we need to be doing this?

  • Personal Responsibility?

    You lie about degrees and designations, then you should face penalties. No excuses for those who openly falsify qualifications to steal a job from those who are truly qualified.

Comments