Bruce Lear lives in Sioux City and has been connected to Iowa’s public schools for 38 years. He taught for eleven years and represented educators as an Iowa State Education Association regional director for 27 years until retiring. He can be reached at BruceLear2419@gmail.com
We’ve all probably been trapped in a no-win situation. There’s no way out. There’s no good choice.
That’s often called Hobson’s choice. It was supposedly named after a 17th century stable owner named Hobson who had a corner on the market and forced customers to choose the horse closest to the door or take no horse at all.
Customers had no real choice. They could walk or pay good money for a bad horse which Hobson always located closest to the door.
Hobson’s choice is depicted by the cartoon bully scowling, doubling his first, and shouting, “Do you want to get punched in the stomach or face?”
No choice, just an ultimatum.
The majority party in the Iowa legislature has trapped public schools in a no-win situation. It’s Hobson’s choice at its worst because it isn’t about a broken-down horse, it’s about the futures of public school students.
Iowa Senate Republicans passed a bill increasing State Supplemental Aid (state funding per pupil in public schools) by 1.75 percent. Governor Kim Reynolds had proposed a 2 percent increase. Republicans on the Iowa House Appropriations subcommittee voted for an increase of 2.25 percent. After backroom negotiations, the full House amended the Senate’s 1.75 percent increase to 2 percent, and it passed both chambers with votes only from the majority party.
It was “Kabuki theater.” The outcome seemed predetermined to be a 2 percent increase in school funding.
One chamber’s proposal was a punch in the face. The other was a punch in the stomach. Every education group said schools needed at least a 5 percent increase to survive chronic underfunding and inflation.
The final bill included an additional $7 million to increase pay for paraeducators and support staff, but that was only half of the $14 million House Republicans had wanted. Although that funding is needed, it is really a band aid solution to a tourniquet problem.
A 2 percent increase in state funding means per pupil spending will be $8,148, or $160 more per student than the state gave for this academic year. My guess is that most families will spend more than $160 on each of their students just getting them outfitted for the new school year.
Public schools will need to make no-win choices, impacting students and the communities where they live. Cutting programs, teacher layoffs, increasing class sizes, closing buildings, and/or four-day school weeks will be on many school board agendas. Taxpayers could see property tax increases.
Rural schools may not have long enough buses to hold all the letters in the reorganized school district names. If a town loses all or part of its public school, the town is on a death watch.
So, what caused this Hobson’s choice?
A few factors are most important. Under the 2023 law creating Iowa’s school voucher program, every student enrolled in private school next year (regardless of their family’s income) will be eligible for $8,148 in an Education Savings Account—the same amount as state funding per pupil in public schools. There’s no ceiling on how much the state may spend on Education Savings Accounts. Although the exact numbers are sketchy, approximately 27,866 students received private school vouchers in 2023.
By 2024 that number grew by 11,109 students. If the private school voucher plan continues to grow unchecked, 2 percent might well become the meager maximum increase for all future years. Quite simply, Iowa can’t afford two publicly funded school systems, separate and unequal.
Second, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Service Agency, Iowa’s revenue has decreased by 8.1 percent since fiscal year 2024. This year the state will tap into the Taxpayer Relief Fund and the ending balance (past budget surplus) to fill a hole of nearly $1.3 billion.
Third, the majority party appears to favor private over public schools. A new private school voucher plan combined with steep income tax cuts blew a hole in the budget.
Voters hold the key to unlocking Hobson’s choice. If there had been a rival stable, Hobson’s broken-down horses would have stayed by the door, and buyers would have had a real choice.
The same is true in politics. The majority party has been in control for a decade, and Iowa schools have received insufficient state funding. It’s time for voters to shift the balance of power, so politicians can offer public schools more than Hobson’s choices.
Top image is by Bankrx, available via Shutterstock.
8 Comments
interesting
Bruce makes some interesting points. But have to wonder how much “is enough” for public schools? If 2% is too small, is 10% “too much”? How much money does it take to turn around a failing public school? Should proficiency improvements be tied to future funding? What about those property owners who don’t have children in public schools? Should they get some property tax relief if they have no kids or homeschool? As for vouchers I do feel that a means test is needed. If your children are attending a public school with high dropout and illiteracy rates most would do anything to escape the future felons and bullies who inhabit their schools.
ModerateDem Tue 10 Mar 3:58 PM
When is the last time
you have been in a public school? Or a private school? Every time schools are brought up in a story here, you come out with doom and gloom about how badly public schools are doing. I will admit there are problems with our schools but it is not all bad. Look at the great things schools are doing. Look at the children who are succeeding and thriving in our schools and there are a lot of them. Talk to school administrators and teachers. Do you think they agree with you that they are doing a terrible job of educating children who walk in every morning carrying a myriad of personal problems? As for private schools, why don’t they have the same problems? Well, we don’t know because they don’t have to report on their problems and the only problems we do see are their desires for more funding and unfortunately, many of our legislators have a vested interest in seeing that private schools succeed and public schools don’t. Did you attend a public school?
bodacious Tue 10 Mar 5:15 PM
Public Schools are Outstanding
I think public schools are doing an outstanding job in spite of Legislative meddling and underfunding. Teachers work with what they have, but they should have more. Iowa can do better.
Bruce Lear Tue 10 Mar 6:17 PM
Hi bodacious
In addition to not being subject to public accountability, private schools can also pick their students. There’s no requirement to serve special needs students or those coming from difficult home environments.
It’s also interesting how tuition rates somehow increased once private schools started receiving public funding. Seems they sure know how to count their money.
I have no issue with private schools to include those with religious affiliations. But when they accept tax dollars, the rules must be the same.
The overarching problem is that Iowa Republicans have no fiscal discipline. Taxes for the affluent are cut while they fund their pet ideological projects. Our state is overextended . . . using its savings account for daily living expenses.
Iowa government services will eventually become the a hellscape, just as ModerateDem seems to view public education.
As bodacious notes, we have no clue about the outcomes achieved by private schools. So it seems any comparative judgement about public schools is not fully informed and blind acceptance of Republican clickbait.
Bill Bumgarner Tue 10 Mar 6:34 PM
sadly we will have to choose
between a candidate for Gov who supports the current privatization plan 100% and one who wants a mote limited version.
Not sure what posts bodacious is actually replying to but clearly not any of the ones that Bruce has written.
The problem isn’t that Repugs “have no fiscal discipline” it’s that their plans are deeply illiberal and largely divorced from realty….
dirkiniowacity Tue 10 Mar 6:43 PM
Sorry if I was not clear
but I directed my response at ModerateDem. I always enjoy Bruce’s posts and I agree with Bill on his take of our legislature. As a former teacher, I have always tried to cheerlead for our schools and oppose any attempt to undermine them.
bodacious Tue 10 Mar 6:58 PM
Blackhawk County
As a union member, I’m sympathetic toward the teacher’s union and feel that someone(ModerateDem) asking “how much funding is enough” is indeed a valid question. Blackhawk County has some outstanding public schools and some real slackers. Does increased funding really solve all problems? I have union sisters and brothers who send their children to Columbus via vouchers and hold no resentment toward them.
https://www.publicschoolreview.com/iowa/black-hawk-county
union50702 Wed 11 Mar 11:55 AM
thanks for the clarification bodacious
that was puzzling but now I understand, better not to feed the trolls if one can help it.
dirkiniowacity Wed 11 Mar 4:34 PM